🧵The Law that made Social Justice and killed the constitution 🧵 1/
America now has two Constitutions
The one you all know comes out of the revolution of 1776 and was adopted in 1789
The other, which has now supplanted all the rights of the old constitution... is from the 60s
2/
America is a country that guarantees free speech... yet everywhere every institution seeks to censor you.
America guarantees private property...yet everywhere regulators tell you what you can do in your own home or business.
This is not a coincidence.
3/
Communists Advocate: "From each according to their ability, to each according to their need"
Sounds nice, like how things work amongst very trusting family or friends
But the wise or knowledgeable will ask the obvious question: What about the third group?
4/
When you make the communist principle a governing principle, the most important group is not those with ability, or those with need... It is those who DECIDE who has ability and who has need.
And the communist Commissariat claim that total power for themselves.
5/
And every aspect of why communism is horrifying is immediately understandable as soon as you understand this.
The Commissariat can decide what is ability, what need, and thus can take everything.
When "property is theft", all things are the property of the bureaucrats.
6/
In 1964 America adopted and equivalent governing principle:
"Anti-Discrimination"
Sounds nice... No one likes discriminatory behaviour amongst their friends or family...
But the most important group isn't who's discriminating for or against, its who decides and enforces.
7/
The '64 civil rights act and follow on anti-discrimination law, via logical necessity, created a class of bureaucrats, lawyers, advocates, and administrators who get paid to debate and decide whether your speech and personal conduct constitutes discrimination.
8/
If you are at school, work, volunteering, in church, or in anyway interacting with any of the institutions of modern life, administrators get to decide if your basic speech and associations are discriminations, and punish those institutions if they do not punish you for it
9/
Your basic constitutional freedoms of speech, association, property, privacy, and conscience are completely surrendered in every institution or association you might interact in if they at all touch the vague possibility of "Discrimination"
10/
Is it at all surprising that this group, with the power to completely control or punish anyone and everything to do with "Discrimination", has chosen to define absolutely everything as discrimination?
11/
Social justice is NOT an ideology, it is NOT a bizarre madness of college graduates.
Social Justice is the logical consequence of 60 years of suspending basic US constitutional freedoms and elevating a system of social control in its place.
It is Commissars seeking power
12/
You will never have freedom of speech or association as long as the '64 civil rights act or "Anti-Descrimination" law stands.
You will never be free of social justice as long as the laws which allow social justice to rule are in place.
13/
And instead of attacking the root of the problem. The Source of every HR department and university administrator's power...
Instead of fighting to restore the constitution...
"Conservative" politicians focus on bullshit fist shaking and do nothing symbolic statements.
14/
Republican governors could defund every single university Queer studies department in Florida and instruct their departments of justice to enforce the existing Indecent Exposure to a Child laws... but instead they makes empty threats.
15/
But boomer conservatives will not oppose the 64 civil rights act, nor oppose university funded activism, nor enforce even existing indecent exposure laws...
Because they believe in the authority of Antidiscrimination law.
16/
Boomer Conservatives believe in the moral authority of people who hate them to judge their thoughts and associations more than they believe in the constitution or what the founding generations would have considered basic human freedom and property rights.
17/
Just as one cannot begin to talk about the decline of the American family without addressing the horrific predatory nature of the family court system.
One cannot address social justice, censorship, and the diversity commissariat without attacking the law that made them
P.S. I also write long takes
Aristotle theorized "Aristocracy" the impossible dream of "The Rule of the best" and most societies have sought (and failed) to achieve it.
1982's Conan the Barbarian has one of the best scripts ever put to page, up there with Citizen Kane or Lawrence of Arabia.
Director/writer John Milius wrote the scripts for Apocalypse Now and HBOs Rome
And this is easily his most coherent, most complete work
2/
Robert Eggers celebrated arthouse director of The Witch and The Lighthouse, beloved for the depth of his scripts, researched the hell out of norse culture and ancient revenge cycles...
And his Northman just wound up being beat for best the exact same movie, only worse.
3/
Conan's base dialogue is so overwhelmingly poetically gorgeous.
"The mounds have been here since the time of the titans. Kings are buried in them, great kings. Their domains once glittered like the lights on a windy sea"
Americans don't understand class. American socialists especially
Every week i hear: "How can Trump be considered anti-elite? He's a billionaire!?"
This fundamentally misunderstands class. its not how much you have, its how you make it.
And Trump definitely ain't elite
2/
Classic Marxist economics divides class via the individual's means of securing resources.
The proletariat trade their labour to employers for wages.
The bourgeoise use their ownership of the means of production to extract surplus value from the proletarian laborer
etc.
3/
Sure this ussually resulted in the bourgeoise being wealthier than the proles.. but not always. Some decayed bourgeoise barely made more than proles, while many successful skilled proles earned as much as lower tier bourgeoise.
🧵Fedposting is your Civic Duty🧵
(Not legal advise) 1/
Probably no secret police force in world history has achieved a greater psychological victory than the US letter Agencies in the 21st century.
The tabooing of "FedPosting" is now almost total on the internet.
2/
On dissident forums across the web no sooner has someone advocated revolution or invoked the image of a guillotine before the accusation of "Fed" starts flying.
Statements are said to "Glow" and participants called "Glowies" if they advocate anything but ineffective activism
3/
In this the letter agencies and particularly the FBI have achieved a psychological victory over dissenters to the regime greater than almost any security force in the history of the modern world...
And they have won this without any legal grounding whatsoever.
I don't think people understand the significance of Jan 6th...
Indeed I don't even think Democrats screaming about "Threats to our democracy" Understand the significance
2/
The 1789 Women's March on Versailles was a revolt of the Parisian lower classes against the monarchy...
Once they had arrived and captured the royal family, the royals would remain hostages of the revolution until the revolution chose to execute them 4 year later.
3/
Versailles had been built 20km outside of Paris to prevent this kind of thing. The distance was to provide an insurmountable buffer to mobs from the city and allow cavalry a chance to muster
Thus these poor Parisians were not considered a threat nor granted patronage
Alot of people have dismissed the possibility of civil war in the US.
But there are a shocking number of factors that make the US the most likely candidate for civil strife in the western world
2/
The raw size of the US is really unnatural.
Most wealthy countries have 1 maybe 2 major cities Paris is 12 million people then Lyon is 1.5. London is 9 mil... then next largest Dublin (1.4) broke away in the 1920s.
The US has 56 cities with a metro area over 1 Mil
3/
By contrast Canada has a similar settlement pattern to the US, but has only six 1mil+ cities
And Canada's history is one of all its founding peoples constantly rebelling, forming terrorist groups, separatist movements, etc.