🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
Want to know how the Pfizer Vaccine fraud worked?
Yes, we can actually call it fraud now!
Read this thread 🧵 ⬇️⬇️⬇️
Pfizer told us their vaccine is 95% effective (🤡).
What that really means is it's effective against testing positive - they never published the actual rate of illness.
Corona-like-illnes (CLI) is the actual relevant endpoint, that should have been measured in the RCT's.
Now we have more data:
"The vaccine only reduced the incidence of COVID-like illness by a relative 9.4% from an absolute 18% to an absolute 16.3%, [..]"
--> That's a reduction 1.7%, or 9.4% in relative terms - but what a minute, what about the vaccine side effects?
That's right, vaccinated people suffered many more side effects, for example severe systemic events, like fever > 38C.
So according to Pfizer
“3,410 total cases of suspected, but unconfirmed COVID-19 in the overall study population, 1594 occurred in the vaccine group vs. 1816 in the placebo group.”
The 9.4% are from 1816-1594=222 more cases of CLI in the unvaccinated group.
As you can see in the previous screenshot,
331+85-20-10 = 386 vaccinated people alone got a fever over 38C. Since fever is a symptom of CLI, that alone pushes Vaccine Efficacy (VE) into negative territory.
So in summary, we have strong evidence that the vaccine - at best - modulates the body response to the PCR test, but does not lead to fewer days of illness (net).
Not even talking about deaths!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Diamond Princess 2020 - only 17% of passengers were PCR positive, less than 9% symptomatic.
83% were not infected and already immune, hence PFR = IFR = 7/3700 = 0.19%!
0.19% is exactly in line with a regular flu. 83% not infected is also in line with a regular flu season. There was basically no flu in 2020..
Here's a detailed age break down.
Eric Feigl-Ding, and others, spreads vaccine propaganda with supposedly scientific models.
I explain why this is clear unscientific misinformation here in the thread!
🧵 1/n
Ein Molekularbiologe verbreitet mit angeblich wissenschaftlichen Modellen Impfpropaganda.
Warum es sich hier um klare unwissenschaftliche Missinformationen handelt, erkläre ich hier im Thread!
🧵 1/n
In weniger als einer Stunde und mit ein paar Zeilen R Code habe ich ein ähnliches Modell - welches auf Fehlannahmen beruht - nachgebaut: github.com/USMortality/ch…
Also, wie funktioniert es?
Ganz einfach, es beruht auf der - nie wissenschaftlich belegten Annahme, dass die Impfung zu ~90% vor dem Tod schützt.
So können wir ein Modell erstellen, das die Case Fatality Rate (CFR) ohne angeblichen Impfeffekt berechnet.
Since more than 6 months, is the central leader of the anti-lockdown movement in Germany, Michael Ballweg, imprisoned by the @die_regierung of Germany.
They have thus far not brought any charges forward against him, and have just extended his imprisonment for 3 months. 1/n 🧵
The government has not brought forward any charges, but continues to investigate against Michael for alleged fraud and money laundry.
Who here believes that a government cannot prove fraud/money laundry in 6+ months?
To me, it is becoming more and more clear that it is clearly the goal of the German Government to 'punish' Michael for his opposition against the unscientific, and proven-to-be deadly COVID-19 lockdowns.