Ben Profile picture
Feb 10 8 tweets 2 min read
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
Want to know how the Pfizer Vaccine fraud worked?
Yes, we can actually call it fraud now!
Read this thread 🧵 ⬇️⬇️⬇️
Pfizer told us their vaccine is 95% effective (🤡).
What that really means is it's effective against testing positive - they never published the actual rate of illness.
Corona-like-illnes (CLI) is the actual relevant endpoint, that should have been measured in the RCT's.
Now we have more data:
"The vaccine only reduced the incidence of COVID-like illness by a relative 9.4% from an absolute 18% to an absolute 16.3%, [..]"
--> That's a reduction 1.7%, or 9.4% in relative terms - but what a minute, what about the vaccine side effects?
That's right, vaccinated people suffered many more side effects, for example severe systemic events, like fever > 38C.
So according to Pfizer
“3,410 total cases of suspected, but unconfirmed COVID-19 in the overall study population, 1594 occurred in the vaccine group vs. 1816 in the placebo group.”
The 9.4% are from 1816-1594=222 more cases of CLI in the unvaccinated group.
As you can see in the previous screenshot,
331+85-20-10 = 386 vaccinated people alone got a fever over 38C. Since fever is a symptom of CLI, that alone pushes Vaccine Efficacy (VE) into negative territory.

Fraud. Case closed.
So in summary, we have strong evidence that the vaccine - at best - modulates the body response to the PCR test, but does not lead to fewer days of illness (net).
Not even talking about deaths!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ben

Ben Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @USMortality

Feb 6
South Korea, saw +63% excess mortality in March 2022. At that point, 86% of their population was vaccinated.
Read 4 tweets
Feb 1
Diamond Princess 2020 - only 17% of passengers were PCR positive, less than 9% symptomatic.
83% were not infected and already immune, hence PFR = IFR = 7/3700 = 0.19%!
0.19% is exactly in line with a regular flu. 83% not infected is also in line with a regular flu season. There was basically no flu in 2020..
Here's a detailed age break down.
Read 5 tweets
Jan 22
Eric Feigl-Ding, and others, spreads vaccine propaganda with supposedly scientific models.
I explain why this is clear unscientific misinformation here in the thread!
🧵 1/n
In less than an hour and with a few lines of R code, I recreated a similar model - which is based on false assumptions:
github.com/USMortality/ch…
So how does it work?
Quite simple, it is based on the - never scientifically proven - assumption that vaccination protects ~90% from death.

This allows us to create a model that calculates the case fatality rate (CFR) with no assumed vaccine effect.
Read 7 tweets
Jan 22
Ein Molekularbiologe verbreitet mit angeblich wissenschaftlichen Modellen Impfpropaganda.
Warum es sich hier um klare unwissenschaftliche Missinformationen handelt, erkläre ich hier im Thread!
🧵 1/n
In weniger als einer Stunde und mit ein paar Zeilen R Code habe ich ein ähnliches Modell - welches auf Fehlannahmen beruht - nachgebaut:
github.com/USMortality/ch…
Also, wie funktioniert es?
Ganz einfach, es beruht auf der - nie wissenschaftlich belegten Annahme, dass die Impfung zu ~90% vor dem Tod schützt.

So können wir ein Modell erstellen, das die Case Fatality Rate (CFR) ohne angeblichen Impfeffekt berechnet.
Read 11 tweets
Jan 12
VAERS COVID-19 Death reports to-date - absolute numbers!
VAERS COVID-19 Death reports to-date - Incidence per dose.
Read 4 tweets
Jan 7
Since more than 6 months, is the central leader of the anti-lockdown movement in Germany, Michael Ballweg, imprisoned by the @die_regierung of Germany.
They have thus far not brought any charges forward against him, and have just extended his imprisonment for 3 months.
1/n 🧵
The government has not brought forward any charges, but continues to investigate against Michael for alleged fraud and money laundry.

Who here believes that a government cannot prove fraud/money laundry in 6+ months?
To me, it is becoming more and more clear that it is clearly the goal of the German Government to 'punish' Michael for his opposition against the unscientific, and proven-to-be deadly COVID-19 lockdowns.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(