Big revelations this week about balloons spying on US. These aren't really revelations. Two years ago I laid out exactly this was happening, why it was happening, its historical precedent, that it was directly conflated with UAP, and that was a big problem thedrive.com/the-war-zone/4…
And no, this does not explain all UAP, not at all, as the piece states clearly in its opening. I believe there are unexplained instances that deserve all the scrutiny we can hope the US gov is finally giving them...
But as the piece laid out, our adversaries have used our stigmas toward UFOs against us and yes the government was way behind the curve in realizing any of this or at least willing to confront it. Even the basic structure of the DoD's now real UAP office is laid out in the post..
What I can say, is that the balloon thing is more widespread, not UAP, clear balloons with payloads where they should not be. The drone thing is another layer that is perhaps more troubling. But this is not new, now it's catch-up time, but this recent series of events are...
a good thing. Nobody was harmed and now this reality will have to be dealt with, as will the fact that UAP are being conflated with what is actually a very real and pressing security threat. The damage already done is likely very severe. But now we can close the gap, finally...
And work to better separate truly unexplainable events from those that are actually very low-end technology that is so simple it is somewhat alien based on our established defensive posture. And above all else, getting rid of this totally fucked stigma about reporting...
things in the sky, in space, on or below the oceans, that are unusual, especially by our military personnel. The next major capability leap by an adversary could look very alien or even be disguised as such. Choosing to be blind to what's coming over the horizon due to...
crazy pop-culture stigmas is maybe the most absurd military strategy of all time. But that has been the case and we have paid the price. And no, the powers that be don't want to advertise that they don't control the airspace they are tasked with controlling, but here we are...
we can change that and considering what we spend on national security a year, and that this is all defensive in nature, everyone should be onboard for doing so. Balloons are just one aspect of this of course, but they move so slow and have a small signature, they can be...
hard to spot, not just within a sensor's technological capabilities, but often times slow objects like that are filtered out deliberately. Finally, I think there is a lack of training on recognizing the presence of electronic warfare, or maybe there had been. That needs to change
It's hard to make people listen. There is so much noise out there, true signals are hard to recognize, especially in the media space. But the DoD needs to change how it looks at threats overall and how it acts on them. Huge programs reign supreme, these are often focused on...
fighting the last war, not what's coming and focus on traditional capabilities, not confronting asymmetric ones or even leveraging them to your advantage. We saw this same reality with drones, I screamed about it for years as many of you know, now, once again, it's catch-up time.
The enemy knows you have superior traditional capabilities, while they will work toward parity if possible, or numerical advantage, they will also work in parallel to exploit the holes in your strategy using far more attainable asymmetric capabilities...
We now live in an age where long-range precision-guided weaponry is democratized. Barrier to entry is very low. We are still not prepared to deal with it. So, call all this a big trial balloon. It may not be sexy, it may not give someone another star on their lapel or a...
a top-paying job at a huge defense contractor, but countering these low-end capabilities & having the creativity to recognize them before they become a problem, & the agency to do something about it, is key to our future national security. Let's learn these lessons while we can.
As always thank you for reading and excuse any typos (long week). I am going to share some critical supporting work that has been published since this piece on the use of balloons and the UAP conflation issue.
This is our most recent in a long series of pieces on these events that build on eachother. Make sure to click through the rabbit hole of links. thedrive.com/the-war-zone/m…
With NORAD and its various sensor systems and platforms having to deal with way more sensor data based on lifting velocity and possibly other filters due to the presence of these balloons, artificial intelligence will become key to managing this data and properly evaluating...
it before actions are taken. Otherwise, it will be very tough and expensive to retain this type of surveillance and alert/scramble posture, which is a very costly and specific mission set. The rate of false positives will go through the roof, what AI can do...
is work as a filter to assess the targets it is seeing to the point that it would alert an operator if it seems genuine, this could also including cueing other sensors onto it enhance its probability of a valid detection. These capabilities already exist to some degree...
Got hit with many questions after this thread as to what else would be best for taking these down. Well, directed energy (lasers) would be best! But they do no exist in a relevant application in an operational form just yet (hopefully soon), but laser-guided rockets in their...
in their anti-air configuration with a proximity fuse would be the best thing and that capability is sitting very close to an operational state. It would need to be tested and a concept of employment devised, but they are already being used in testing to...
shoot down cruise missiles and low-flying drones. What you get is laser proximity fuze like AIM-9X that would be able to detonate properly on a balloon target where a radar fuze cannot, & it's far cheaper, as APKWS run about $20k each, although the anti-air version may be more...
Washington Post reporting that this was indeed part of the case, they literally hadn't dropped the speed gate filters on the radars. If this is true, it tells you how in tune/asleep at the wheel with this threat the DoD has been, as well as the UAP thing in general.
And this is not to 'shit on' the military. Incredible people doing incredible things every day, way braver and smarter than I am, but it is a huge bureaucracy with many competing agendas, turf wars, and special interests with piles of money intertwined.
One thing the F-22 lacks is an advanced targeting pod (ATP), which have become critical tools in the air sovereignty/air policing and more general counter-air mission set. The F-15C/D and F-16C/D for instance carry these for these mission sets. Why this matters in these...
instances is that the pod, which is primarily used for long-range visual identification of aerial targets, can also collect high-fidelity visual intelligence on the target using both their IR and TV cameras that can be highly useful in analysis...
of what these things are and their capabilities. Handheld off-the-shelf-like cameras are carried instead by F-22 crews which are also very useful but in many ways far less capable than the pods, especially for stabilized video and nighttime intercepts...
On 'exchange' rate for these shootdowns, the USAF paid $472K for an AIM-9X in 2020. A lot of money but not by counter-air missile standards these days. People just don't realize what modern guided weapons cost (you can see those costs in the pieces linked below), but in the..,
case of these shootdowns, it really doesn't matter. There are thousands of AIM-9Xs in stock, a few missiles is no issue. Dozens get fired in tests and training each year. But, in the scenario i laid out before, where an adversary launches...
hundreds of balloons, any of which could carry a very problematic payload, during a time of crisis when our units are largely deployed, our capacity to deal with it is shot and yes it would be a horrible exchange rate and deplete our stockpile. These weapons take years to procure
I would make an educated guess that this is more of a change in policy/ROEs and especially an intelligence collection campaign at this point then a new invasion of unidentified craft. They will have to give an assessment now. The dam may have finally broke. This is a huge deal.
Then there is the possibility that we have been so blind to this & W/the stigma around it that our early warning radars' software was not updated to detect/alert to slow flying objects like this...