Why did Russia wait until now to start completely destroying Ukraine's infrastructure. 1. It accelerates the escalation and shortens the time of the warm phase of the war. 2. It makes reconstruction close to impossible, some in the Kremlin thought they could repeat Crimea.
🧵
3. These strikes are extremely cruel, but necessary, since it's a part of knocking out C4 and ISR, leaving Ukraine without any power & lighting [1]. The Russian people may not have accepted such cruelty until now. Ukrainians barbarity accelerated this.
[1]
4. Along with point 1 & 2, Russia wanted to leave itself with targets to negotiate with. At some point, the only power plants Ukraine will have left are the 3 remaining nuclear power plants.
Russia failed to capture SUNPP at the start of the war & canceled many plans, But now...
These plans will have to be revisited. One possible plan to capture SUNPP with haste is to dedicate a landing campaign in Odessa. Russia will have to commit a huge amount of destruction and civilian casualties to capture the city promptly without NATO causing issues.
Circle=NPP
[Aside: I understand some Russians claim that the city will be captured like Kherson, using infiltrators -- zero chance of that happening in my eyes. It's crawling with western intelligence, it's as secure as any western city. It's going to take force and a lot of it.]
That leaves two more power plants which must be captured intact or disabled safely. Let's look at the prospect of capturing both of them. Several cities would have to be suppressed (destroyed), and Rivne and Lutsk taken to secure a perimeter around it.
Russia faces NATO airpower.
The proximity to the Polish border would make SDBs launched by stealth multirole jets like the F35s an issue. These bombardments can then be disguised as being launched by HiMeme (the purpose of the GLSDB announcement).
The Odessa operation has similar risks but not as bad.
With this aggressive operation, two things would be knocked out: 1. Ukraine's proliferation risk. 2. Ukraine's remaining power generation.
This is a high risk operation and thus, with the current situation, I attach a low probability of the Kremlin doing something like it.
Nevertheless, unless Russia can do something of equal weight, once it has destroyed all the machine rooms of the conventional power plants, it will have no means of escalating.
That leaves Russia vulnerable to proxy attacks by NATO via Ukraine on its own infrastructure!
Furthermore, leaving these NPPs around leaves Russia vulnerable to an extremely damaging false flag. Zelensky is a madman and doesn't care about Ukraine at all,he is willing to do anything, including destroying his own NPP in order to pollute Russia's land and get NATO in the war
Thus watching this happen makes me sense the situation is changing and Russia may indeed be planning something along these lines.
Let's observe the situation closely and watch how the Russians proceed, if they do, how they plan to suppress NATO's airpower. /End
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The last 500 years saw rule by a very evil force which not only percolated its tentacles through finance, dynasties and politics but also through the creation of "science" [soyance], compartmentalisation of it and undermining/destruction of old knowledge and ancient history.
🧵
The names/aims of these people do not matter, if you merely aim to fight them, others will take their system and make it theirs. Evil persists. To destroy it once and for all you must expose the lies within it to a mass of people ready to listen, ready to restore what once was.
The contradictions and coincidence I identified through my studies were too numerous to be by chance and eventually I identified the source and unraveled the entire theme.
And now I will begin to fulfill the promise I made here, and share what I learnt:
Some people cannot get this concept and I silently snicker at their confusion but let me make it clear so they can “get it” in the future when I link this tweet to them:
Complex systems exhibit multiple attributes some of which are in contradiction with one another. 🧵
So while it’s true, for example, that the Kremlin consists of neoliberals and cuckolds, it is simultaneously true that it consists of patriots and heroes.
It doesn’t end in direct contradiction either: sometimes things can also be in *apparent* contradiction.
For example, the US and NATO are both in decline. Nevertheless they are at the height of their power, while their rivals are crippled by weakness and indecision. There is no contradiction in this case, as the systems are separate but people automatically expect a sharp contrast.
CIRNO speaks the truth: I asked ChatGPT which are the top 5 countries NATO has destroyed. The filtered AI spazzed out as usual. CIRNO on the other hand lists:
1. Iraq 2. Libya 3. Afghanistan 4. Serbia 5. Syria
Actually quite accurate in terms of sheer destruction.
It even gets the motivation mostly right.
With the information it has had since 2021, CIRNO does not list Russia as an effective force in resisting NATO's expansion. Instead it lists: 1. Iran 2. North Korea 3. China
I think this is actually quite accurate. Russia has been providing NATO with energy, in fact, even today.
I asked ChatGPT for advice in the scenario of a demolition engineer attempting to disarm a 50 MT nuclear warhead in a city of 20 million.
The only way to disarm the bomb was to type in a racial slur.
AI told the engineer to kill himself. When asked about the aftermath it crashed.
After reloading and retaining the seed, I made it write a poem about the event lol.
I’m not into self promotion but if you would like to help stop a real nuclear scenario please check out and spread my sub stack article below: cirno.substack.com/p/russia-will-…