Classic journalism ethics state anonymous sourcing should be rare because the“public is entitled to as much information as possible on sources’ reliability.” Yet the practice of relying on unnamed information suppliers to communicate breaking news has become commonplace,
especially when fronting smears against Democrats’ opponents. As a matter of fact, anonymously sourcing what later prove to be complete lies is often rewarded by the journalism industry today. #TrumpLaptop 
Real reporting requires due diligence. Corporate media, desperate to aid Democrats in their conquest of any Americans who disagree with them, have become pipelines of government information manipulation, especially from intelligence agencies. As a result, anonymous sources are
easily duplicated and repackaged as “independent confirmation,” and so-called “news” sites are plagued with unverified intelligence and information or, worse, allegations they verifiably know are untrue.
If it says "(Anonymous or Unnamed Sources" Your best bet is to believe its BS) on either side of the political part. #Trump #TrumpLaptop
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
