I wanted to do a thread about operating mortars and a thread about tank ammunition... but can't, because before those two I have to do a thread 🧵about rifled and smoothbore barrels.
All NATO mortars (except for one) and all NATO 120mm tank guns (except for one) use
1/20
smoothbore barrels. This one mortar and this one tank use a rifled barrel, just like all NATO assault rifles, machine guns, auto cannons, recoilless rifles (photo: Carl Gustaf barrel), gatling guns, 105mm tank guns, howitzers, etc.
(Note: Shotguns use smoothbore barrels). 2/n
Why rifling? Well, you want the bullets, rounds, and projectiles to hit the intended target, therefore you have to stabilize them during flight. There are two ways to do that:
more ancient way to stabilize a projectile during flight... but spin stabilization is actually more precise.
There is a ton of physics needed to explain this in detail... which isn't as much fun as watching NFL players throw perfect passes, because they spin the ball and not 4/n
as much fun explaining how artillery uses spin to smite the enemy.
This is the barrel of an M777 howitzer. The rifling isn't random - it's aligned to the ammunition that will be fired from this barrel. You want the projectile or bullet to fly through the air tip first, with 5/n
too much or too little spin the projectile will wobble and crash.
Spin rate also vastly differs between calibers - i.e. a 5.56mm M4 Carbine fired bullet will spin around 5,200 times per second, while a 155mm M777 howitzer fired projectile will spin about 250 times per second. 6/n
But not just the caliber, the weight and length of the projectile, the length of the barrel, the amount of propellant, etc. are used when calculating the twist rate of a barrel, because the barrel's grooves exert torque on the projectiles passing through the barrel & thus 7/n
impart a spin on the projectile's longitudinal axis, which stabilizes the projectiles longitudinally through conservation of angular momentum.
For smaller calibers, like NATO's bullets, the projectile's diameter is actually larger than most people know as the caliber is 8/n
actually the land diameter. I.e.
• NATO 5.56mm bullets are actually 5.70mm
• NATO 7.62mm bullets are actually 7.82mm
When the bullet is fired its jacket (usually copper) is deformed: this engages the rifling, which imparts the spin AND obturates the barrel to prevent the 9/n
propellant gas to blow by the bullet. Every bullet coming out of a barrel has distinct rifling grooves imparted by the barrel's rifling.
But what works with bullets you don't want to use for explosive filled projectiles... well, first because they are explosive filled and
10/n
you don't want them to be deformed.
Secondly having the entire body of a 155mm projectile engage the rifling would wear out the rifling in no time.
Thirdly scratches and grooves on the projectile will mess with its aerodynamics and when firing a shell 20+ km any deviation in
11/n
aerodynamics will result in missing the target.
Therefore explosive filled projectiles have a driving band (also called rotating band). That band is usually copper or copper alloys.
Some projectiles also have a obturating band made from plastic or nylon. 12/n
Smaller calibers, like i.e. the 30×173mm ammo for the A-10 Thunderbolt II's GAU-8/A Avenger cannon use plastic driving bands for obturation and to engage the rifling.
But artillery (and rifled tank cannons) use metal driving bands. 13/n
Driving bands and obturators are protected by a cover during transport. Obviously you have to to remove that after you screwed in the fuze and before you fire the projectile.
14/n
Once you're ready to fire the projectile is rammed into the cannon, past the charge chamber and into the barrel with the driving band wedged into the forcing cone between charge chamber and barrel.
You better ram the projectile hard into the cone or it will slide back out. 15/n
Once you fire the projectile the driving band will deform, seal the barrel and engage the rifling.
And your projectile is on its way - with the driving band cleary showing the grooves imparted by the barrel's rifling. 16/n
The spin also serves a second purpose: to ensure fuzes are not armed prematurely fuzes (especially point detonating) included a Setback Lock (Red) and a Spin Lock (Blue), which armed the fuze once certain acceleration and spin values were achieved.
I use past tense, as today 17/n
the mechanical locks are being replaced by MEMS chips.
And now to the M982 Excalibur precision guided munition, which as you can see, does not have a driving band.
There is a plastic obturating ring, which will engage the rifling, but in the Excalibur projectile only the 18/n
base bleed section spins... and at a very low rate, as once Excalibur reaches the apogee of its flight it deploys fins and glides to its target as a fin-stabilized projectile.
This video shows first a high explosive projectile & then two Excalibur projectiles in flight. 19/n
This was my (hopefully understandable) thread about rifled barrels and spin-stabilization.
Tomorrow we will hear a lot about smoothbore barrels and fin-stabilization, when I post my threads about mortars and tank guns.
20/20
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A thread about the best infantry fighting vehicle: the Swedish CV90.
Nine European countries (🇸🇪🇳🇴🇩🇰🇫🇮🇳🇱🇪🇪🇨🇭🇨🇿🇸🇰) have bought the CV90 and others are now eyeing it as their future IFV (🇺🇸🇬🇧🇫🇷🇮🇹).
1/25
The reason NATO's big four military powers are eyeing/assessing/trialing the CV90 is that it is a mature design with every imaginable variant already existing.
The CV90 isn't the best armored IFV - the best armored is the German KF41 Lynx in this photo. And the CV90 isn't 2/n
the cheapest IFV - that would be the South Korean Redback in this photo.
The CV90 is, due to its many users, the most versatile armored vehicle in production now. Similar to the Leopard 2 tank and the F-16 fighter many users means that there is constant development and 3/n
German submarines and frigates for Ukraine? Forget it.
1) On 27 February Turkey closed the Straits for warships. If you want a submarine or frigate for Ukraine to pass them, you will also reopen the Straits for russian warships - i.e. a the cruiser Varyag, which the russians 1/6
tried for months to get into the Black Sea as replacement for the Moskva. 2) and if you get Turkey to reopen the Straits, the russians will know EXACTLY when the Ukrainian ship passes & will be waiting with a fleet and fighters on the Black Sea side = good bye Ukrainian ship.
2/n
3) yes, you can send ships over the Rhine–Main–Danube Canal, if their draft is less than 4 meters and if they are not higher than 6 meters above the water line, or the first bridge will stop you... and you need Hungary (!) and Serbia (!!) to agree to let you use the Danube.
3/n
British Army soldiers are some of the best in the world... but 90% of their equipment sucks!
I.e. the Warrior IFVs and Scimitar recon vehicles have ancient, unstabilized cannons that need to be reloaded BY HAND with 3 (!) round clips. 1/4
For decades the British governments refused to properly fund the army... and so British armoured formations use now mostly antiques:
FV432: 60 years old
CVR(T): 53 years
Warrior: 37 years
Only the Challenger 2 tank and AS-90 self-propelled howitzers are still acceptable...
2/4
but both need urgently new turrets. The Challenger is getting one and the AS-90 turret is in production in Poland for the AHS Krab.
But as long as British governments refuse to finance the British Army properly, the army will have to continue shrinking personnel and equipment
3/4
Earlier I posted a thread about how Abrams, Leopard & Challenger, and Bradley, Marder & CV90 combine with infantry and armored support vehicles during an combined arms attack.
As people asked about the supporting & sustainment elements of a combined arms attack I will do now
1/25
a thread about these.
Please read my earlier thread before continuing with this one. Here I will give you a very rough overview of the elements an armored brigade or division staff has to plan, prepare and execute for a successful armored attack.
Soon Challenger 2, Leopard 2A5/6 and M1A1/2 Abrams will roam across the Ukrainian steppe to hunt and destroy russian armor.
All three are leagues better than what the russians field, but tanks on their own are useless. So, an easy to understand thread about combined arms 🧵: 1/n
Western tanks like the M1A1/2 Abrams, Challenger 2, Leopard 2A5/6/7, Leclerc, Ariete AMV, Merkava IV, K2 Black Panther have way better armor than russian tanks.
An M1A2 Abrams is visibly larger than i.e. a T-72 or a T-80, and weighs (depending on model) 15-20 tons more. 2/n
That extra weight is mostly armor. russian tanks are not able to penetrate the front armor of modern Western tanks at distances of 2 km (because the armor is twice as thick as what russian APFSDS projectiles can penetrate).
Photo of a Strv 122 APFSDS training round, which 3/n
Before I continue: do you know how NATO 155mm howitzers work? If not, please read my earlier thread about the M777 howitzer.
Once you know how the M777 works (and what primer, fuzes, and charges are), then you will easily understand this thread.
The M109A6 Paladin is the sixth modification of the M109, which was introduced in 1963.
It's a good system, but AS-90, CAESAR, CAESAR 8x8, Archer, PzH 2000, AHS Krab, and Zuzana 2 are all better systems.
The Paladin still uses a 39 caliber barrel and thus has an 18 liter 3/n