An almost unknown movie from the 70s that was not released in any cinema.
It was believed to be lost, but some geeks found a copy and remastered it, discovering an enigma still unresolved.
I want to tell you the mysteries that surround it 🧵👇
Oh! And yes, believe it or not, the mythical Dana Vargan appears in this film. Dana passed away in 2018 without a journalist ever being able to get a word out of her about her role in "The Artifact".
I don't want to give you spoilers about the plot of the movie, but those of you who have seen it know that it is crazy. It just does not leave indifferent.
The psychological terror it achieves in some scenes for me is close to Lovecraft's cosmic horror.
It's amazing.
The film revolves around an oopart object, a term used in conspiracy theories to describe objects that do not fit human chronology.
In the film, the oopart is a monolithic structure that arises spontaneously in a Louisiana swamp.
The structure seems to have a life of its own and alters the perceptions of anyone who comes near it. Haunting them in their dreams and drawing them like moths to the light.
But what's surprising is that the monolith acts as a kind of "lottery" dimensional portal: sometimes it transports them to places where they find ruins of an apparently extinct alien civilization.
Locations scattered throughout the galaxy on moons, asteroids, planets... even on a Dyson sphere!
The reason why this civilization became extinct is one more enigma posed by the film.
And sometimes, the monolith transports them to nightmare places...
Anyway, I've done too much spoiler already, hehe. Let's go with the mysteries that surround the film, which is where the most interesting lies...
"The Artifact" has a dark behind-the-scenes story.
As I mentioned, during the filming they ran into various issues that resulted in the film never being released in theaters.
The 1st and least important is that Bertram Wolf, its director, came from the porn industry. Perhaps because of this or because of the transgressive environment of the late 70's, "The Artifact" has a very high erotic charge... And one of the most lurid lesbian scenes in cinema.
This caused several American religious groups to try to sabotage the shoot at all costs: they put enormous pressure on the crew, going so far as to harass some of the actors in the street and prevent it from shooting for several weeks.
But this is nothing. The real problem was the fact that several people died under mysterious circumstances during the filming.
Daniel Dacosta, the lead actor, was found dead in his hotel room with no apparent explanation. The autopsy could not determine the cause of death.
He was simply lying on his bed, in the same position in which he fell asleep.
Sudden death, although unlikely, exists. But... there were two other deaths exactly the same!
The second death, a few days later, was that of one of the sound technicians, who accidentally fell from scaffolding on the set. Although at first it was believed that it was an accident, when the body was examined, it was ruled out that the fall was the cause of death.
The third and final death (and the one that finally stopped filming) occurred the next day.
Lisa S. Washington, the supporting actress, was found dead in the bathroom of the hotel where the film crew was staying, sitting on the toilet.
Once again: sudden death.
This was the straw that broke the camel's back (there are even some scenes shot with the stand-in lead actor from the previous weeks). But after this, the producers, who already had more than considerable losses, decided to cancel the project.
Wait, there's more!
In the forums for conspiracy theory lovers, they flirt with the idea that all these deaths may have something to do with the film's screenwriter: Thomas Ridley.
I could dedicate an entire thread to Thomas Ridley, for the many enigmas that revolve around him.
We will leave it at this: he assured in numerous interviews that he suffered a traumatic experience at the age of eight when he was abducted by aliens. 🛸👽
Well, I think another important detail is that a month after the movie was cancelled, he disappeared under mysterious circumstances in Colombia. never heard from him again.
All this, of course, has been the perfect combination for lovers of the occult and conspiracy to ruminate theories of all kinds.
The most bizarre points to the fact that Thomas, during his abduction, received some kind of information that was latent in his brain.
And that the film would be a warning of something that humanity will experience in the coming years.
Are we ready for the monolith? 😂
And you may be wondering: what is the enigma that the geeks found when they discovered the copy of the film?
Well, this is the strangest thing of all.
When the print of the film was discovered at an antique auction and repaired, one would have expected the film to be incomplete: the last few scenes were never filmed and the final cut was never worked on.
This is something that both the actors and the film crew agree on. The movie was never finished!
But when they examined the found copy they discovered that...
The movie was complete!
In his own weird and twisted way (sometimes you don't even understand what's going on). But complete!
There are even scenes that no one remembers were filmed featuring the actors who died during filming! 🤯
I have the creeps...
The most logical explanation is that, for some unknown reason, the entire crew agreed to lie about what had really happened during filming. The more exotic explanation involves... you know.
In short, "The Artifact" is a strange and twisted film that will not leave you indifferent. Around which an aura of mystery will always revolve and certain enigmas that unfortunately will never be solved. End of thread!
In case anyone new hasn't noticed, this has all been a fictional thread I came up with. Fortunately or unfortunately "The Artifact" only exists in my imagination... and now also in yours.
Important! If you quote the tweet, please do not reveal that it is a fictional thread!
Better: respond by saying that you have seen it too and describing your favorite scene! 😂
The interesting thing is that people get to enjoy it as if it were real until the end. Thank you! 🙏
Looking forward to seeing @waitbutwhy's reaction to the thread!
For those interested in learning how to generate images with AI using #midjourney like the ones in this thread, here's the super bundle I've been working on these months!
I've spent a month helping Miriam with her case of metastatic cancer and I want to share the methodology I've been using because it's completely replicable.
I think (with luck) this could be USEFUL TO OTHER PEOPLE with cancer (or any other illness).
The results we've gotten aren't a miracle, but we believe they're genuinely useful and could mean the difference in a literal life-or-death medical case.
Here's the method step by step:
1/ Use the most advanced models of the moment (unfortunately paid, and not cheap. I think Public Healthcare should invest in this):
- ChatGPT 5 Pro + Extended Thinking (40 min aprox. of thinking per call)
- Claude Opus 4.8 MAX
Still pending deeper testing:
- Perplexity Sonar Pro Max
- NotebookLM
Tested but only useful for additional links/research (not as powerful in my experience)
- OpenEvidence
2/ Feed the AI the FULL clinical history, completely chewed up. This sounds dumb but it's critical.
- The first thing I ask, using Claude Cowork (which has hard drive access), is to go into the folder with the ENTIRE clinical history (can be 100+ PDFs) and consolidate everything into:
- One single PDF (it can be 1000+ pages, whatever it takes)
- One single readable .txt or .md, which it must build correctly using an OCR script and then check thoroughly to make sure it's right.
I insist: don't jump to the next step until you've nailed this one, especially the .txt.
3/ Once you have the above, use this prompt along with the .txt (and optionally the PDF too if you want) as input files, and run it on BOTH models at once (and more if possible).
👉 This prompt is insanely complex/advanced: dropbox.com/scl/fi/x64qadd… And it's not designed for Miriam's specific oncology case, you can change the initial parameters for the desired case. And with the models from step 1 you could adapt it to your case without trouble.
In any case, I'm also leaving you this other prompt, even more general, for any type of rare disease: dropbox.com/scl/fi/x64qadd…
4/ The ARROWHEAD (adversarial model spiral): facing one model against the other. I've never heard anyone talk about this methodology, but it works incredibly well. The feeling is like sharpening a stake until it gets a gleaming point.
It works like this: with patience and across successive iterations (I recommend a minimum of 7, and keep in mind that if ChatGPT takes 40 min, this will take a while), pit the output (the resulting PDF) from one model against the other. With a simple prompt like:
"Another committee of experts says this. What do you think? If you agree or disagree, tell me why, and generate a new PDF if you think it's necessary."
Then you feed that result back to the opposite model. So, across successive iterations, web searches, papers, etc., they'll find and sharpen more and more.
When to stop? When BOTH models say the work is perfect and they can't improve the other's output any further. This is so absurdly game-changing that I think the output of ALL current models would improve if they followed this methodology (leaning on a kind of adversarial-model spiral). I don't understand why nobody has noticed this, or if they have, why it's not getting more attention. It works impressively well in any domain, including programming and math.
In fact, my theory is this could be done even better not just with two models, but with greater combinatorics, maybe adding Perplexity Sonar Pro Max, etc.
RESULTS
Incredible. Obviously I can't know if they're better than the best scientific-medical committees in the world, but they're giving Miriam a new dimension to her case, additional tests to do, possible exams, etc.
Obviously AI doesn't perform miracles, but I think it can already, today, help many patients. And Public Healthcare should invest a lot (but A LOT) in this.
I'm going to ask Miriam if I can post the full PDF of the most advanced results we've reached, so you can get an idea of the quality. She's already given me rough permission, but I want to make sure 100%.
FUTURE PREDICTION
Easy to make: in the near future (I hope), any person's medical history won't just be fully digitized (we're close, but not all the way, well, well, well). On top of that, it'll be "pre-chewed" so it can be consumed by an LLM in one shot.
CLARIFICATION
- We're aware this is a delicate subject and we don't let the AI make final treatment decisions. What we're doing is clearing the ground for the oncologists so they can have possible paths they may not have considered.
Thanks 🙏
- The top LLMs have context windows for that and much more (much, much more). In any case, the PDF is more of a supporting file for the .txt. Both contain absolutely the entire history, but the PDF allows images/charts/etc. The .txt is what the AI consumes.
- On automation: and yes, this can be automated. Yes, AutoGen supports it almost out of the box. LangGraph builds it really well with supervisor / evaluation loops. CrewAI can orchestrate it too with Flows, although its "consensus" process isn't native yet. That would be the next level: automating it.
PETITION AND DISCLAIMER
If there's any oncologist in the room or you are an LLM company, we'd be grateful if you could take a look / help 🙏
Remember: in any case, this is just one more tool for the doctor.
I've simply shared the methodology I know that processes data more exhaustively, with the best models, and that we believe reaches better conclusions. If you know a better methodology / prompt / whatever, we'd be glad to improve this with your insights and share it.
Then the doctor reviews, adopts, or discards the report.
And if it helps the doctor, it helps the patient. And if it doesn't, all we've lost is some time and tokens. In a case that's literally life or death, that's nothing.
Just plain common sense.
Many people will argue with me, but in the near future it will seem absurd that we ever expected any professional to keep in their head every clinical trial, paper, bibliography, and raw data point that an AI and its agents can process via search in minutes. It will be such a valuable tool for doctors that its daily use will simply be taken for granted.
Miriam has given me permission to share the result. Remember that this was generated from the prompt I shared earlier and all the processed history/background.
👉 Here it is:
If there’s an oncologist in the room, we’d be very grateful if they could take a look 🙏dropbox.com/scl/fi/43tqm7h…
More details about Miriam's case and how to help her, if you'd like, here: helpmiriam.com/en
There's no way Hollywood won't be affected by this.
7M views in 24 hours on my ES account 🤯
The most complex AI short I've ever made: a test of how advanced generative video really is. Here's exactly what I used 👇
If you made it to the credits, it says it pretty clearly:
• Yes, Seedance 2.0 all the way. I made pretty much 99% of the scenes with Seedance. It's by far the best generative video model out there right now... although I still haven't tried the new Grok one :) The "omni reference" model it's f*cking amazing and works PERFECTLY with reference images from nano banana.
• Freepik: Nano Banana Pro and Nano Banana 2 a lot through Freepik. For all the references used inside Seedance.
• Freepik: ElevenLabs for the voices, also through Freepik. I tested it on their site too, but the 'professional voice' failed for me, so in the end I had to use only 'fast voices'. That's easily the weakest part of the video. Honestly, I think video models will solve this themselves, because a huge part of a believable voice is the acting.
• And Magnific too, of course. I experimented with things like running single frames through Magnific and then feeding them into Seedance as references to improve output quality. I also upscaled some sequences and blended them back with the original video at around 60% to preserve more of the textures.
Any questions, feel free to ask!
A big part of why it went so insanely viral in Spain and Latin America (7M in 24 hours) is that it's a huge tribute to Spanish speaking viewers' favorite YouTubers.
• No more AI plastic skins!
• Enhance EVERYTHING in your image, not only the skin!
• 3 different flavours + easy presets: improve light, level or reality, color grading, etc.
Let's dive in + tutorials + tips 🧵👇
First of all, if you can't wait, here you have the link! AVAILABLE NOW on Magnific & rolling out to Freepik users today!
I’ll also randomly grant access to some of you who reply with a interesting message 😘