I've seen 'gender critical' people discuss about how they think trans teenage girls are 'porn-addled boys' who 'want to grow breasts so they can fondle them,' now tweeting about how tragic it is that Brianna Ghey was murdered, and I promise you, no-one wants to hear from you.
When trans people publicly grieve, and are justifiably angry, how dare you tweet things like 'don't politicise this,' when you literally dedicate your lives to making trans people's existence a political issue. Ditto with 'it's not the time for this.' The gall of that reply.
If you have a Twitter acc that contains year's worth of calling trans women 'male born person with a penis,' or 'trans-identified males,' what level of narcissism does it take to think anyone wants to hear from you when one of the targets of your account is murdered?
I've seen you, in your relentless transphobic videos, saying the world would be a better place with fewer trans people in it, so I know exactly how empty, how souless, how immoral your expressions of 'grief' are now that the world has one less trans person in it.
Today, it's carefully-worded 'polite' tweets, where you handwring while you step around Brianna's gender, but tomorrow it's back to your 'gender critical' mantra of 'I'd rather be rude than a f*cking liar' and singing 'if a person has a penis he's a man' at your tawdry rallies.
Magdalen was talking about all trans women when she wrote this, and you adored her for it. JK Rowling described Berns as 'brave' and 'a believer in the reality of biological sex.' You don't get to think this person was praise-worthy and then mourn the murder of a trans person.
Graham Linehan said that trans people and advocates were 'gleeful' after this murder.
Trans people are not 'gleeful' you absolute ghouls.
They're f*cking scared, and they'd absolutely love if you'd shut up about them for a day, or, preferrably, forever.
I promise you, they aren't comforted by your tweets about the murder of this 'child' or 'teenager,' or whatever word you use to avoid saying 'girl.' They are all the more sickened that a bunch of campaigning transphobes couldn't shut up for just one day.
Staff at the Times UK - which is the main 'gender critical' outlet for the media - REWROTE THEIR ARTICLE to remove references to Brianna as she/her after they found out she was a trans girl. How transphobic, how disgusting a human being do you have to be to do that?
As a 'gender critical' person, that is the sort of inhumanity and transphobia you support. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if 'gender critical' leaders got in touch with the paper demanding they rewrite the article, so please spare trans people from your sickening, fake grief.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Hey @artymortyarty, you went to a gender critical rally in Brighton last year where white supremacists in the UK showed up to support the gender critical movement, and were largely welcomed. 1/
In fairness to the GC movement, a small few GC women did speak up and say "hey, maybe the optics of openly hanging out with white supremacist blokes is a bad idea." Doctor Jane Clare Jones was one of those women. She was drummed off Twitter and Maya Forstater...2/
...recently responded to JCJ's objections saying they didn't really have much hope of finding popular support in the GC movement.
And Maya is right, because it is not a "women's rights" movement. No true women's rights movement ever welcomed white supremacists. 3/
What a good person would do @Glinner is first apologise for doing a lap of honour wearing a t-shirt that read 'is the world's 2nd greatest athlete gay' as a homophobic taunt of his nearest competitor. It's nothing to do with being 'a man,' that's just basic empathy and humility.
This is from a 2008 article in the The Independent.
Maybe, like a lot of 'gender critical' men, he's not a very nice person, who enjoys being not very nice to people who he feels are beneath him, which now includes trans people?
In the next tweet, GL will claim that he's fighting for gay people's rights, but anyone who was truly doing that wouldn't ally with a man who has never apologised (AFAIK) for using a homophobic taunt on a world stage, thereby encouraging others to use those taunts at the time.
In a recent study 59% of trans prisoners reported being sexually assaulted within a California correctional facility (compared to the average of 4.4%) But, when trans women try to tell these stories, transphobes suddenly *forget* their 'one rape is one rape too many' principles.
Why is that?
It's because they couldn't actually give a shiny sh*t about prison rape. They're the sort of guys who still probably privately make 'drop the soap' jokes. No-one who is against prison rape in prinicple would start 'doing the maths' on a claimed number of rapes.
Because what does it matter if was 2000, 1000, 100 or 10? It clearly happens, and is still happening today. Trans women aren't lying about this en masse.
Daily rape for 4 years should not be a punishment for stealing a car, right? Can't we all agree with that?
In my pinned thread, you'll see how EJ Rosetta's 'trans activist to T*RF' story turned out to be BS. See how 'gender critical' ppl like @artymortyarty defended EJ then, calling us 'cultists' for criticising her, juxtaposed with how he was tweeting yesterday. Who's in the cult? 1/
Is it the trans advocates who knew this story was BS at the time, or the 'gender critical' people who swallowed it? @HJoyceGender applauded EJ's 'journalistic integrity.' @MForstater also applauded and celebrated EJ. It took 5 mins of research to see the story was utterly BS. 2/
You'd have to have taken leave of your critical faculties to believe her story at the time, as it was obvious that she was into 'gender criticism' FIVE YEARS ago, and was actually a fully paid up member of Kellie Jay Keen's organisation, attending an event of hers in mid 2022. 3/
Every trans advocate who commented on this told @jk_rowling that this 'story' about being a 'trans ally who was commissioned to write about JKR only to 'discover' she wasn't transphobic' was full of holes, yet the GC movement embraced EJ.
Today, they regretted that. Why? 1/
Today, she threatened to post pictures of 'gender critical' leader's Kellie Jay Keen's kids, that she had taken at a KJK event, if KJK didn't give back her 500 quid lifetime membership she had 'accidentally' paid to KJK's 'gender critical' organisation. 2/
She also accused KJK's husband of looking at her breasts at this event, and putting his arm around her to get a closer look at her breasts. EJ's evidence of this was a GIF of him vaguely looking in the direction of her camera. EJ also felt the need to say she had 'good tits.' 3/
Yesterday @Glinner retweeted the account of a founder of a UK org who argue for gay conversion therapy, he's allied with anti-gay campaigners, and attended a 'gender critical' rally in 2022 which welcomed the homophobic Far Right.
But the backlash against gay marriage is...1/
For years, the 'gender critical' movement have openly allied with the Religious Right. They've retweeted their accounts, appeared on their channels etc.
How else does JK Rowling end up replying 'Big Love to You' to someone she knows is a religious anti-gay rights campaigner? 2/
Their 'LGB Alliance' org is a front, a sham, for conservative ideals. Look at this tweet where they say it's not necessarily homophobic to be against gay marriage, and that marriage is not popular among LGB people anyway, asking 'can we drop it now?' 3/