Cis kids are given puberty blockers to alleviate distress caused by precocious puberty, and not one transphobe I have talked to has any answer as to why they are fine for cis kids but "dangerous" for trans kids, beyond the transphobic notion that being trans is "harmful."

https://twitter.com/BevJacksonAuth/status/1991283366499397900

Transphobes will concede that the vast majority of trans kids who receive puberty blockers go on to take HRT, which demonstrates to any unbiased view that this is effective, evidenced medical help, but instead they complain about PBs "concreting" (their word) trans "identities."

The "gender critical" movement's celebrity detrans activist has started using transphobic slurs of late.

And you can bet the next time she's featured by the UK press, they won't inform the general public of this.

She'll be presented as a "concerned victim of trans ideology." This matters, because Keira is one of two people currently taking a legal challenge trying to halt a puberty blocker trial, and this tweet is relevant, and it should be disqualifying.

It's clear she is not motivated by concern, but by hatred.

Helen has listened to trans people, for years. She doesn't "believe" that people are born trans anymore than people who listen to gay people "believe" they are born gay.

She *knows* it.

It's an inevitable conclusion from listening to the facts.

https://twitter.com/CarilynJohnson/status/1987888442705907911

And the thing is, people like Carilyn actually do know this. That's why, for example, when Graham Norton merely said "l think we should listen to trans people", the "gender critical" movement immediately set out of bully him off social media. They need to squash that message.

Would love to see @nickwallis make a TV show where the "gender critical" movement is portrayed as the plucky "little guy," with the final scene being their billionaire leader and financier tauting trans people by smoking a fat cigar on her 50 million pound super yacht.

https://twitter.com/JournalismSEEN/status/1979983384680993135

Mr. Bates v The Post Office was powerful TV because it exposed how the establishment destroys the little guy in order to protect the establishment.

The story of the Supreme Court case is about the establishment ganging up to destroy the little guy.

Reality is acknowledging the existence of trans people - their innate humanity - and legislating accordingly, in the exact same way as we had to change the constitution in 2015 to legislate for gay people's existence, even though a lot of people didn't want Ireland to do that. 1/

https://twitter.com/AnMailleach/status/1976213510259658863

Ireland has a long and pretty disgusting history of bigotry against LGBT+ people. Our treatment of women and children, and LGBT+ people under the iron grip of conservative Catholicism is a stain on Ireland's legacy that will never - and should never - be erased. 2/

If the vast majority of trans kids go from puberty blockers to HRT without regret (true), it demonstrates that "the pause button" of puberty blockers is not necessary.

That's inescapable logic.

Trans kids have the right to experience puberty along with their peers. When studies came out that trans kids do vastly go from puberty blockers to HRT (because of course they do, being trans is an innate human reality), Transphobic people interpreted this as puberty blockers "concreting" (their word) "trans identities."

1. It isn't "bigoted" or "bad" to not mourn or be sad when a bigot and a bad person dies.

2. "Leftism does not make you a good person" is a strawman argument.

3. Left Wing ideals are better than Right Wing ideals, and create a better world for more people. 1/ Reading this article, once you get past the nonsensical strawman based on a quite silly personal story, it seems that @stellaomalley3 is struggling with two very personal questions:

1. Am *I* a good person?

2. Am *I* Right Wing? (and is it bad if I am?) 2/

Would be great if the Irish Times and other national papers would platform trans people on how Graham Linehan and his relentless campaign of abuse - typical of "gender critical" actvists - has effected their lives. Instead we get yet another handwringing article by a cis person. I would wonder if Graham had called for another minority to be punched in public would we have handwringing about "free speech" and a "both sides" defence?

At least, I suppose, the endless string of "he's not a transphobe" articles seem to have stopped.

That's something.

I listened to a bit of a "friendly" live stream where this woman was interviewed. At the top of the interview she said that she her friends didn't agree with her because they weren't as well informed, but then demonstrated she wasn't well informed in the rest of the interview 1/

https://twitter.com/MShipworth/status/1963542724109332594

For example, she brought up Judith Butler, who is the "gender criticals" pantomime "queer theory" villain. So, naturally, the interviewer asked her for her thoughts on queer theory and she said she didn't really know too much about it. All she knows is Judith Butler bad. 2/

Hi @jk_rowling

Graham tried to sue me once for repeating three things that were said on his Youtube channel by someone else. My solicitor replied with a non-exhaustive list of 30 instances where he had defamed and abused me. I never heard from his solicitors again. 1/

https://twitter.com/jk_rowling/status/1963297139905167722

This is the threat. It is vindictive, nasty, threatening, full of abuse and is in reply to a perfectly reasonable repetition of what was said on his channel. (The legal letter he eventually sent did not challenge the tweet at all, because it was true.)

Who's the bully here? 2/

Maybe another reason that @jk_rowling isn't commenting on Gaza is that Neil Blair is her literary agent, and these are the sort of tweets he is retweeting about Palestine. And yet he remains as her agent?

(With thanks to @LastRainbowFlag for highlighting this.) 1/


Neil is not just her agent, he served as chairman of her charity Lumos from 2010 to 2021. He has also been involved in production on Harry Potter movies. They clearly have a very longstanding and strong working relationship. 2/

Literally had 100s of conversations with "gender critical" activists, and know exactly what they say they believe, and what they actually believe.

For one, they have absolutely zero feminist principles (they say they do, they but they don't in practice.) How do I know this? 1/

https://twitter.com/glosswitch/status/1946600567821730214

Their movement platforms domestic abusers - men who have beat their wives about the head - which would SICKEN actual feminists. Actual feminists would not be able to keep quiet about their movement doing that, and yet, GCs never criticise their movement when they do it. 2/

One thing that anti-trans gay people like @Martina can't seem to grasp is that we're not saying that trans and gay people are the same, but that the OPPOSITION to people being trans and gay uses the same arguments and the same rhetoric, and often comes from the same people. 1/ Famously, homophobes claimed that lesbians like Martina were grooming young girls in tennis to become lesbians.

Lesbians were portrayed as predators. And even if they themselves weren't predators, how could you tell which lesbians were and weren't?

Sound familiar? 2/

If an author says they will use the profits from their books to target the human rights of a minority, especially a minority that is facing higher hate crime and suicide rates due to a global campaign of oppression, it is immoral to knowingly keep selling that person's books. 1/ So, the question here is not "why has this bookstore stopped selling JK Rowling's books?" the question is why does everyone else keep selling them? Selling or buying Harry Potter merch, currently, is an act of hatred of the trans community. 2/

https://x.com/NBCNews/status/1938371802276774204

Last night, @jk_rowling encouraged the public to photograph, report and publish pictures of women they think are trans using women's facilities.

I have screenshotted multiple replies calling trans women freaks, sickos, perverts and paedos, and advocating vigilante violence. 1/ Enabling people like this will endanger all women. A few days ago, Rowling was asked how she could tell if someone was trans and she glibly replied that she had the "superpower of eyesight." 2/

While admitting that Rowling is a "lost cause", Stephen Fry also says that the "vitriol" she faces "only hardens her" and is "unhelpful," as if softening Rowling is trans people's duty.

The road to increased trans rights does not lead through deradicalising Rowling. 1/ It was not gay people's job to deradicalise, or to un-indoctrination Anita Bryant or Margaret Court, no more than the road to increased rights for immigrants or black people lies in convincing Tommy Robinson that he is wrong, or finding a way to "soften" him. 2/

"Gender critical" people struggle with hypotheticals.

If Beira's Place took donations, @jk_rowling, would you be fine with them publicly courting and accepting the donation of a celebrity like Joey Barton, who was recently convicted of kicking his wife in the head? 1/ The context of this question was that a rabbit charity, acknowledging that Elon Musk owned a company that was charged with animal cruelty for experimenting on a monkey, still publicly courted and said they would accept money from him. This, apparently, is fine with GC people. 2/

Just saw a video where a prominent transphobic woman said she'd sometimes spread toothpaste on her face, and pretend to shave, she so wanted to be a boy. And the thing is, in her other writings, it is clear that this has never gone away for her.

Some transphobia is self-hatred. She says that she was jealous of the anatomy of every boyfriend she had. It says it took decades to "accept" her womanhood. She struggles with the idea of long hair. She uses the male honorific "Lord" in her online handles, or screen names.

It's really important to understand how quickly online radicalisation works on vulnerable people:

Jan: TERFism is a cult
Apr: (Being trans is) not a cult, that's dumb.
May: I don't support a cult. (note the subtle difference)
Jun: Feel like I'm leaving a cult.

6 months. 1/


In reality, nothing has changed. The "gender critical" movement is still an obvious cult, and they are experts at online radicalisation, they can turn someone from "TERFism is a cult" to this within months, because they can see vulnerabilities in people. 2/

If you're watching Legaltweetz become an anti-trans activist in real time, and you're wondering why a very small number of trans people do this (Buck, Brianna etc.), one of the reasons should be very, very obvious from his (and their) tweets:

Narcissism. 1/ You don't have to be a narcissist to be a bigot, to go against your own community, but it helps. You will see in the tweets very similar themes of citing a long history of activism, how important they are to their community, feeling underappreicated for all that they do etc. 2/

It's 10 years since Ireland enacted a "self-id" law, there hasn't been one incident of a trans woman attacking anyone in a toilet. Cis men have done so, and been prosecuted. Banning trans women from women's toilets based on vibes does nothing for women's safety. 1/

https://twitter.com/jk_rowling/status/1923043306574905771

In fact, it makes women less safe, as has been demonstrated in a number of cases recently where women who don't fit the criteria of what men think a woman should look like have been confronted in toilets by men trying to kick them out. 2/