No one understood this question. If a society relies on something to perpetuate itself and it makes that thing illegal, that society ends.
Patriarchy(as defined by feminists) ended as soon as violence against women became illegal.
Think critically about the crap you believe.
Patriarchy(as defined by feminists) ended as soon as violence against women became illegal.
Think critically about the crap you believe.
https://twitter.com/HoneyBadgerBite/status/1623760060668162049
How much money does Patriarchy put into encouraging 'violence against women' in order to maintain itself? How much money does Patriarchy put into stopping violence against women?
Let's do a comparison.
Let's do a comparison.
If Patriarchy uses 'violence against women' to maintain itself, why wouldn't it start off by making men's violence towards women socially acceptable and legal? Create a 'patriarchal renaissance' in which whatever thing 'violence against women' benefits flourishes.
Incidentally I think the entire structure of this belief system is absurd.
It presumes that men would not just tolerate violence against women but use it as foundational to a social system. That's some serious damn demonization.
It presumes that men would not just tolerate violence against women but use it as foundational to a social system. That's some serious damn demonization.
"Hey Mac, let's slap some 'violence against women' on that leaky pipe."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
