You asked for it, a Valentines sex in nature thread 🧵
1) Adélie penguins: transactional sex: females will give it up for a smooth stone. Males copulate with dead females, their own offspring, other males, and sometimes ejaculate onto the ice. Didn't show that in Happy Feet.
2) Giraffes: the best evidence we have says that the vast majority of sexual encounters in giraffes are male to male, penetrative and ejaculatory, and follow bouts of necking.
3) Australian redback spiders never meet their dad, as his penultimate act of a male is to provide sperm to a female, and his ultimate gift to help with the pregnancy and guarantee his genes survive is a nutritious meal – his own head. This is called sexual cannibalism. #sexy
4) Swans mate for life, so they say. However, DNA fingerprinting reveals that they practice ‘social monogamy’, where a male and female also enjoy ‘extra-pair copulations’. And around 6% of life-long swan lovers divorce –a bit higher than the global average for humans.
5) Lobster don't do any of the things Jordan Peterson says, because he's ignorant and incurious about most aspects of evolutionary biology. And the urinate out of their faces. That's an aside really.
6) Marine iguanas take about 3 minutes to ejaculate. Smaller males get round the possibility of being yanked off by a bigger male when mounting a female by ejaculating before they mount, and keeping the sperm in a little pocket, so they don't need the full 3 minutes.
7) The Tegu and necrophilia. I will simply present the scientific paper by Ivan Sazima, entitled:

'Corpse bride irresistible: a dead female tegu lizard (Salvator merianae) courted by males for two days at an urban park in South-eastern Brazil'
That's all for now. I'll probably do a few more depending on how thirsty I get this evening.

This is all from my very serious work about human exceptionalism and behavioural modernity by the way.
8) Ah yes and of course sea otters. 1) Males drown females and use their carcasses for sex until they fall apart.
2) Sometimes, they fuck females so hard, that they die, and then (see 1).

Yes, the sea otters that hold hands when they sleep: you have bought their cute lies.
9) Female fruitbats perform oral sex on males DURING penetrative sex. Researchers have suggested this might be to delay ejaculation and prolong sex, but frankly those researchers are probably on crack.

Oh, and they do this hanging upside down.
10) If you're on your own tonight, and feeling experimental, a bottlenose dolphin was once observed masturbating with an electric eel on its penis.
11) Hyenas live in female dominated societies, where hierarchy is established by clitoral licking.
11.5)Their clits are large, which confused researchers for many years (and this is telling about patriarchal assumptions), cos they assumed many females were males, and referred to their sex organ as a pseudopenis.
Aside: you should read Bi by @drjuliashaw. It's fabulous and so is she.
12) There were 2 bears in Zagreb Zoo who performed a daily act of felatio, lasting 4 minutes, always the same giver/receiver, who hummed until completion. The write up suggests this is some sort of substitute for suckling, but maybe they just liked it.
Aside: here's a feature I wrote about the Book of Humans, with some sex, some tool use, some Peterson-bashing which is fish in a barrel).
13) And as for us, we have decoupled sex from its historical primary purpose. Out of every 1,000 sexual acts that could result in a baby, only one actually does. In statistics, this is classed as not very significant.

So, whatever you're up to or into, get consent, and enjoy!
I'm running out of steam here, but 14) Male Cape ground squirrels are promiscuous, and masturbate after copulation, we think, for hygiene reasons, protecting themselves from sexually transmitted diseases by flushing their tubes. But y'know...
Wait! My former editor @hollharl reminded me that 15) bedbugs Cimex lectularius pierce the abdomen of his mate with a pointy scythe-like aedeagus, and the sperm will find their way to the eggs via the internal organs of the female. This is known as ‘traumatic insemination’.
@hollharl 16) The hermaphrodite flatworm Pseudobiceros hancockanus do ‘penis fencing’. The winner pierces the head of the other with its spiked organ, and coerces the loser into adopting the female role in this relationship, and becoming the sperm receptacle and egg bearer.
@hollharl That's it! Happy Valentine's Day, sweet dreams lovers 💖🏳️‍🌈💜

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Dr Adam Rutherford

Dr Adam Rutherford Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AdamRutherford

Feb 4
This story neglects to mention that the attempted edits DID NOT WORK, but He Jian Kui implanted the edited embryos anyway. This is one of the most obvious violations of basic ethics, and yet here we are, a lecture tour around U.K. universities.…
He was attempting to modify the CCR5 gene to introduce the delta32 allele, which when homozygous bestows immunity to HIV infection. BY HIS OWN results, the two embryos that became LuLu and Nana DIDI NOT carry this version, but new edits unknown to science or nature.
This is one of many scientific and ethical violations that should’ve shut down this experiment dozens of times over. And yet, here we are, a U.K. university lecture tour. Pigeons have a better understanding of bioethics.
Read 5 tweets
Feb 2
Hello. My latest book Control: the dark history and troubling present of #eugenics is out today.…
Some links: here's Bad Blood, the Radio 4 series, with everything from Plato to Trump, The Great Gatsby to Mendel, Francis Galton to designer babies.
The reviews were generous - even the Daily Mail gave it 5* - but here's one by @questingvole in the Spectator.
Read 9 tweets
Jan 24
⚡🧬 New paper klaxon! 🧬⚡

A bunch of us at @GenSocUK have been thinking about the public perception and understanding of genetics, and how it may have changed during the pandemic. So, we commissioned a large survey, and this paper is the results.
We figured that the pandemic response involved public exposure to genetics and molecular biology in an unprecedented way – all of a sudden there were daily discussions all over the media of PCR, exponential growth, R numbers, vaccines, mRNA, and spike proteins.
The results are cautiously promising. We asked people their views about genetic technologies, and assessed their knowledge of genetics in general. We asked them about their information sources.
Read 9 tweets
Jan 22
Perfection! All the History Reclaimed wankfantasists are wetting their tiny bunched panties about this spectacular book. You just know if you're annoying ahistorical pub bores like these tiresome carotid throbbers, you're doing the right thing.
The thing is that it's meticulously researched, and terribly well written. You can see why Its critics in the right wing press hate it, cos they don't seem to be capable of either of these traits.
Instead, read a review by a proper well respected historian.
Read 4 tweets
Jan 12
I am enjoying Harry Wales’ book a lot. I mean, it’s tragic and laced with deep sadness. It’s not brilliantly written or read, but it’s a moving insight into the life of a fairly normal boy, born into a pantomime of absurdities, cruelty, and madness.
Each character also a victim of the absurdity of the life they were born into, the casual cruelty of boarding schools (please read @BeardRichard on this), the nonsense of the monarchy, and the utter immorality of the press.
I am no Royalist, not even close. And it is hard not to conclude that if we do not want to pass misery on, the whole absurd, deranged monarchy should be dissembled. It makes people mad.
Read 6 tweets
Jan 11
Not for the first time, I find myself disagreeing with A.N. Wilson's literary output. Here is my review of his 'biography' 'of' Darwin and his work - something I know a little bit about. Deranged: literally the worst book I have ever read about Da
Wilson is fine entertainment in his well carved out domain of comically bad biographies. Here is one in which he was hoaxed into believing a fake love letter that included an acrostic: "AN Wilson is a shit."
The master historian of the Nazi period @RichardEvans36 was incapable of identifying all the errors in Wilson's 'travesty of a biography' of Hitler owing to lack of space.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!


0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy


3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!