It's the 12th most populous country in the world, the size of Italy but with 2x more density.
Is it the culture?
The economics?
Development?
Religion?
Geography?
If you look at Filipino women's fertility rate, it's indeed higher than in neighboring countries.
What might have caused this?
If you ask the Internets, they will point you at religion. 🇵🇭are the only predominantly Catholic country in East Asia (excl Timor).
If that was true, we should have seen the population grow consistently during the Spanish colonization, which lasted until 1898.
But we see the opposite! The 🇵🇭 population grew mostly in the 20th century. It was still about 20M in the 1950s. It grew more than 5x in the last 70y!
We can see the growth rate explode not during the colonial period, but rather after
Other Spanish colonies like Mexico, Peru, or Cuba were all growing faster than the Philippines until the 1850s, and the Philippines really started standing out in the 2nd half of the 20th century
So it's unlikely to only be Catholicism pushed by Spanish colonizers. What then?
Let's look at some development factors.
As Filipino women join the workforce, their fertility goes down normally (it's in the middle of the pack for a certain level of increase in female labor)
As they study more, their fertility also goes down accordingly (not faster or more slowly than comparable countries)
As child mortality goes down, Filipino women reduce their fertility accordingly (it's in the middle of the pack for a certain level of child mortality)
As the country develops further, it will reduce its fertility
As contraceptives become more available, fertility goes down accordingly (not more or less than in other comparable countries)
That said, contraceptives are less available than in neighboring countries. Maybe this is one of the ways that religion translated into present-day Philippines?
Interestingly, neighboring Indonesia has many religions, and it turns out that the one majority-Catholic island has the highest female fertility.
So maybe it explains a bit of growth additional growth over the last few decades, but not over 100M of ppl
Is there any other factor?
Let's zoom into Luzon, the big island in the north. Where do people live?
Every plain is full of ppl, with the highest density close to fresh water (like Manila, the red blob between the bay and the lake)
You can see this is broadly true for all of the Philippines
But there's also another factor: volcanoes!
Manila is surrounded by a dozen of them. Which make it ultrafertile.
The island of Luzon (below) produces the vast majority of 🇵🇭 rice thx to☀️+🌧️+🌋+plains, all perfect for growing rice, which is highly caloric
In fact, all the Philippines are very volcanic—like many Indonesian islands—which means hyperfertile:
• Volcanic soil is very fertile
• It's recent soil, so it hasn't been leached by rains
• Ash increases fertility
It's one of the reasons why the relatively little arable land that the Philippines has is extremely fertile. The Philippines are the 16th country in the world with most ppl per km2 of cultivated land. The little land they have is very fertile
And the latitude is quite good: Like the Java island, not too close to the equator to avoid leaching from rain, but close enough to have lots of 🌧️ and ☀️
So what does this suggest? Why is the Philippines population so high? 1. 🇪🇸🇺🇸 occupation are unlikely causes of female fertility: growth is recent, while other Spanish colonies grew more slowly 2. ✝️ might play a role, likely small and recent
3. Development also has a role: As the 🇵🇭 grows, female fertility will likely continue dropping 4. It seems like the biggest driver is its geography:
☀️+🌧️+🌋+fresh water+great plains=🌱=🧑🤝🧑 5. These are also perfect conditions for rice, highly caloric
What am I missing? I couldn't find anything exhaustive, so I just looked into it myself. I might have missed something. Do you have other things to add? Great resources that cover all of this? Share them here!
Follow me for more of these, ~1/week.
I'll be writing more in depth about this and other countries soon in my newsletter. Subscribe to receive it, it's free unchartedterritories.tomaspueyo.com
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I respect @BillAckman a lot but I think he's wrong on @Uber. AFAIK his bear case on robotaxis: 1. Not great for bad weather 2. Too expensive to cover peak demand 3. Less utilization because of food delivery 4. They can't disintermediate Uber
1. Not great for bad weather
This is a @Waymo driving in rain—the worst they'll ever be! They already have ~10x fewer accidents than humans. Maybe in the short term humans are going to be better in some really bad weather, but those are short-term exceptions
2. Robotaxis will be too expensive to cover peak demand
This is ptrobably true for Waymo but not @Tesla's @robotaxi, for 2 reasons:
a. Cybercab costs will be the same order of magnitude as normal ICE cars
The Model 3 costs ~$40-$45k, but the Cybercab will have 60% fewer parts: steering wheel, pedals, steering column, backseats, backdoors, side-window mirrors, rear window... Let's assume this will bring the cost down to $30-$35k
Add to that the new manufacturing process that treats Tesla's Cybercabs not as cars, but as electronics. They will be able to produce a car every 5s. This will further reduce their price
Compare that to the price of a car for Uber, which today is between $25k-$60k
Never bet against the US:
Ppl think its biggest strength is its institutions, the dollar, entrepreneurship... But one of its biggest assets is its geography 🧵
1. Size
The US is the 4th largest country. It spans an entire continent, reaches two oceans, and is big enough to be a geographic heavyweight in the world
2. The Mississippi Basin
It's the 4th largest drainage basin in the world and occupies 40% of the contiguous 48 US states, touching 32 of the US’s 50 states. 11 US states directly take their name from it.
Climate caused the US Civil War, because: 1. Slavery was the main cause of the war 2. Different crops were the main cause of slavery 3. Climate caused different crops in the North vs South
This is terribly important to understand the US today and how to heal it
🧵
1. Slavery was the main cause of the war: the Abolitionist North & the Slavery South were competing to expand westward to increase their political influence
But the North grew & expanded faster, to a point where it could force abolition on the South, which then seceded
In 1790, the Free & Slave states had the same population, and there were many more Slave States (8 vs 5), so Slave States controlled the Senate.
By the eve of the war in 1860, the North had 50% more population and 4 more states, giving them control of both the House & Senate
Moscow is one of the weirdest capitals:
• Biggest European city
• Extremely cold
• Little farmland
• To Russia's extreme west
• Not on a coast or main river
How did it create the biggest country on Earth?
It involves horse archers, human harvesting & tiny animals 🧵
The first shocking fact is that Russia is so far north it's at the edge of arable land. How can you create a capital with so little food? Why not in the middle of the most fertile area on Earth?
This far north is extremely cold
Moscow is the 3rd coldest capital in the world and by far the biggest: with 20M ppl, its metro population is 8x bigger than the 2nd biggest cold capital, Stockholm!
This map tells you how a seemingly innocent difference, like wheat vs rice eating, can have dramatic political, economic, and cultural ramifications:
🧵
The areas that harvest wheat vs rice are different. Why?
Because of climate
Rice needs heat and lots of water. Ideally, flooding the fields to also kill weeds. Rice dies with frost.
Wheat resists it well, prefers cooler temperatures, but dies when it's flooded
Did you know the West's trade deficits to China are not recent, but started 2000 years ago? This is the story of how silk, porcelain, tea, opium, and silver have determined the history of the world 🧵
The Romans already complained about deficits to China! Mainly because of silk
Back then the Chinese already preferred manufacturing and selling products than consuming foreign products. Chronicler Solinus ~200 AD: The Chinese "prefer only to sell their products, but do not like to buy our goods."