Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture
Feb 15, 2023 15 tweets 7 min read Read on X
WHOA! Processed cheese 🧀🧀!

Rudy Jaenisch was the first to show REVERSE TRANSCIPTION (RT) of the spike mRNA

Now he publishes a pre-print suggesting that "transfected mRNA doesn't induce as much RT as viral infection"

BUT...
@Kevin_McKernan @JesslovesMJK @RWMaloneMD
The conclusion from this paper is NOT what you think it is.

It LOOKS like it is telling you that the vaccine spike mRNA doesn't reverse transcribe

But it's not.
They didn't use spike mRNA or vaccine, or a virus.

Smart, eh?
The "virus" wasn't virus but a recombinant infectious clone, which can produce huge amounts of quasi-virus.

So it's nothing like an actual viral infection, which produces low levels of viraemia (sometimes none).
And the "transfected RNA" by comparison wasn't mRNA vaccine (which is spike encoding).

It was a nucleocapsid sequence.
Nothing to do with the vaccine at all.
@Maples46014332 @NarfGb @Fynnderella1
They even say this themselves - but it's buried at the end.

"It's important to emphasize that the process of transfecting... differs from vaccine RNA delivery and... the sequence we used differs from the vaccine sequence (Nucleocapside versus Spike)"
So why did Jaenisch frame this preprint like this?

I don't know, but I think the wording is just a reflection of the fact that no paper will be published that suggests any danger of the mRNA therapies.

This is what happens to you if you try.
arkmedic.substack.com/p/welcome-to-g…
And for reference I'll tag the preprint in this thread so that Rudy J (who I respect highly) gets a notification that I've written about it.

He is welcome to correct me.

biorxiv.org/content/10.110…
Should get the message 😉🧀😂
Damn - how did I miss this?
What Rudy is telling the world in this paper is that transfection with multiple copies of Spike RNA (via infectious clone, but it doesn't matter)
(1) induces LINE-1
(2) induces reverse transcription

@Kevin_McKernan @Daoyu15
biorxiv.org/content/10.110…
The quantity of spike mRNA in the COVID mRNA gene therapy vaccines more resembles the infectious clone transfection used in the study, than N-gene transfection.

Rudy is telling you that this mRNA spike transfection is bad. He's been telling you for 2 years.
For comparison, most low grade infections are associated with a blood vRNA level of less than 6000 copies/ml

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34374761/
This is 1000x fold lower than the levels produced by infectious clones

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32289263/
And remember also that
(1) vaccination doesn't protect against infection - so the amount of vRNA is additive
(2) there is a lot of vRNA after vaccination - a helluva lot.

So read this paper again, and read between the lines.

TLDR: the vaccine mRNA is reverse transcribed into DNA in your cells - not least because of the quantity flooding your cells. The virus can not, to any significant extent.

The paper shows it.
And yeah, it's a scandal.
So it needs a name.

#RTgate

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jikkyleaks 🐭

Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Jikkyleaks

Jan 25
@JaninePaynter @PetousisH Following 4 years of enforced medical interventions does the public trust or distrust public health?
@JaninePaynter @PetousisH Always worth recording after the early polling and before the pharma companies send in their accounts.

It's like Georgia. Someone flood the polling station quick! Image
@JaninePaynter @PetousisH And here we have it.
The poll started off in one direction, and as soon as the pharma brigade got hold of it, it went the opposite way.

The problem is that they now have 19 hours to keep the bots going.

@elonmusk please make poll voting a 2-step interaction. TY.
Image
Image
Read 9 tweets
Oct 28, 2023
BOOM 💥💥
It's a gene therapy.
It was a gene therapy yesterday.
It will still be a gene therapy tomorrow.
With a plasmid, it's two gene therapies.

The OGTR confirms:
"Under the gene technology act an [OGTR] approval would have been required"

@SenatorRennick @double_christ
@SenatorRennick @Double_Christ This was a lie from Dr Raj Bhula.
It's transfection.
It's in the Pfizer documents that the TGA have.
Everybody knows it's transfection.
If Dr Bhula doesn't know, she should resign immediately.
The OGTR failed.
From the document that @SenatorRennick is referring to.

They never knew what they were doing. They just needed to make you take it.
Who told them to do that?
And why was it necessary for you to have 3 transfections in order to earn a living?

tga.gov.au/sites/default/…
Image
Read 9 tweets
Oct 25, 2023
Hi @peterdaszak now that I have your attention why did Alice Latinne hide those viral sequences from your 2019 Nature paper, and where did the GP-120 sequences come from?

Asking for 6.9m people who can't, because they died.

.
@chrismartenson
Image
Read 7 tweets
Oct 23, 2023
Well, it used to be rare.

This is the same rare lymphoma that Michel Goldman wrote about developing after a COVID mRNA "vaccine".

(see next tweet).
news.com.au/entertainment/…

Image
Michel Goldman's story in the Atlantic
archive.is/S3xXz
Original paper - which was Michel Goldman's own story, published in Frontiers.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
Read 7 tweets
Oct 22, 2023
Were the claims made in this press conference by a high profile CNN doctor true?

Watch the conference clip and follow the thread below.
It is impossible to know what is happening in another part of the world unless you are there.

But the statements made by Gassan Abu-Sittah cannot be true as made.

If not true they could even qualify as an incitement to further violence. Image
The claims made by Dr Abu-Sittah are not accidental or misinterpreted.

He specifically claimed that 500 people were killed - days after the press conference when it was known that was not true.

Image
Read 15 tweets
Oct 18, 2023
The author of the BMJ article quoted by Viki as if it is gospel is a freelance journalist. He chose not to include that qualifier in this BMJ piece.

This tweet from Viki is propaganda because it suggests something that is not true, adding the @bmj_latest label for authenticity
@bmj_latest Here is the request for the data underlying the MBRRACE report.

Data from the @NPEU_UKOSS has previously been requested under FOI and denied.

This is not their data, it belongs to the British public who fund them.

@bmj_latest @NPEU_UKOSS The BMJ article itself is just an opinion piece from a freelance journalist, basically repeating the party line - that only unvaccinated pregnant women died of COVID.

This is a misrepresentation of the truth.
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(