🧵Vuhledar🇺🇦 16.02 - 9:30 AM Update
1/7 The situation in the Vuhledar area remains stable, however, the enemy doesn't seem to reduce the pressure despite losses. The tactics remain the same: advancing infantry groups covered by tank and artillery fire.
1/7 The situation in the Vuhledar area remains stable, however, the enemy doesn't seem to reduce the pressure despite losses. The tactics remain the same: advancing infantry groups covered by tank and artillery fire.
2/7 The armored vehicles are used for the cover, delivery, and evacuation of infantry. The enemy actively uses tanks from closed positions, while sheer numbers of enemy artillery suppress our artillery, allowing their groups to move closer.
3/7 Alongside infantry reinforcements, the enemy continues to saturate the area with additional artillery. To improve their tactical situation, russian assault groups attempt to establish a foothold near the Vuhledar, albeit with no results.
4/7 Despite the overwhelming numerical advantage of russian occupational forces, Ukrainian forces in the area demonstrate superiority. A big role in it was played by the successful implementation of elements of the Western, NATO-like governance system - mission command.
5/7 Unlike the foe, Ukrainian soldiers and officers can make necessary changes and determine the best course of action on the battlefield based on judgment, initiative, and creativity. This is a far superior system that needs to be indoctrinated more.
6/7 Sadly, this is not always the case in the Armed Forces of Ukraine, as it's not easy to get rid of the soviet-style command system entirely. A small soviet army can't defeat a large soviet army, which is why we need to emphasize the decentralized approach.
7/7 In my next update, I will provide a few examples to demonstrate why this approach works better and how the combination of western weaponry and the western approach can ensure better outcomes for us in this war.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
