The Netherlands is one of the only countries committed to scaling down its livestock sector.
The decision is motivated by a severe pollution crisis but far-right influencers have latched onto this issue, spreading misinformation.👇 #stikstofcrisis 1/11
In a viral video, @rustyrockets described the pollution crisis as a “scam” claiming the Netherlands aims "to bankrupt the farmers, so their land can be grabbed"
@guardian columnist @GeorgeMonbiot explains why these claims are damaging & misleading. 2/11
The Netherlands has a nitrate crisis because of its livestock sector.
With around 3.8 million cows, 11 million pigs & 100 million chickens, the country has the highest density of livestock in Europe, more than four times that of the UK. @tom_levitt 3/11 theguardian.com/environment/20…
"What happens is that you bring in nutrients from all over the world to feed to your pigs, your chickens, your cows in big steel sheds," explains @GeorgeMonbiot.
"They poop out a lot of those nutrients, and then you've got to put them somewhere." 4/11
When farmers spread the waste over their fields, the soil and plants can't absorb all of the nutrients.
The dumped manure then washes off into rivers, where it causes eutrophication, harming and, in many cases, killing plants and animals living in polluted waterbodies. 5/11
Since the 1980s, Dutch governments have been aware of this crisis but didn't act because of strong farmer lobbyism.
In 2019, however, the nation's highest administrative court ruled that the failure to tackle nitrogen pollution conflicts with EU law. 6/11 sentientmedia.org/what-the-media…
The Dutch government offered various routes to farmers and other polluters to help address the crisis.
"My guess is that that is where the audience is. If you want a huge guaranteed audience, you spout far-right conspiracy theories [...]. To see Russell spreading it is heartbreaking." 9/11
"The far-right has always championed farmers," Monbiot explains.
"As with the current situation in the Netherlands, some farmers have happily embraced that and have joined forces, quite explicitly, with the white supremacists and fascists who claim to be defending [them]." 10/11
At Sentient Media, we tackle disinformation and create transparency around the underreported issues of animal agriculture.
This week, people have been discussing if we should eat pork instead of beef to protect planetary health.
Today, we are taking a close look at the environmental, ethical and health consequences such a switch would entail. 1/11
If US Americans ate pork instead of beef, the amount of pork eaten per capita would rise from 51 pounds to 110 pounds.
To make this move possible, the population of farmed pigs would have to increase massively, more than doubling in size. 2/11 ers.usda.gov/data-products/…
Raising pigs for food does generate fewer GHG emissions than raising cows: 1 kg of pork produces 7 kg of CO2e compared to 60 kg of CO2e for 1 kg of beef.
But pork has problematic impacts beyond the industry's carbon footprint. @WeAnimals 3/11
As a short-lived but potent greenhouse gas, methane plays a make-or-break role in fending off catastrophic warming in our immediate future.
Today, we are taking a close look at different methods to measure methane emissions and their pros and cons.👇1/13 sentientmedia.org/measuring-meth…
Because many greenhouse gases contribute to climate change, researchers rely on equations called “Global Warming Potentials” (GWPs) to compare the impacts of different gases.
Using GWPs allows us to convert emissions into comparable CO2 equivalents. 2/13 epa.gov/ghgemissions/u…
Because all gasses are measured against carbon dioxide, the GWP of CO2 is 1, regardless of what time frame we look at.
The GWP of methane does depend on time: Over the span of 20 years, methane is ~81 times more powerful at warming the atmosphere than carbon dioxide. 3/13
Outlet @Newsweek recently published a guide on eating ethically "if you just can't cut out meat and dairy." ✍️ @DewanPandora
While the article criticizes factory farming and misleading food labels, it also promotes several problematic narratives.👇 1/10 newsweek.com/newsweek-com-g…
@Newsweek@DewanPandora According to the article, consumers concerned about animal welfare should buy third-party certified products.
While @Newsweek acknowledges the limitations of some certification schemes, shopping for animal products is even more complicated than that. 2/10
@Newsweek@DewanPandora Most consumers do not have the detailed understanding it takes to fully understand what product labels mean.
This week, a @Nature study found that methane emissions from agricultural ponds are underestimated in national GHG inventories.
Here’s what you need to know about the environmental impacts of ponds associated with animal agriculture.👇 1/11
Agricultural ponds, aka farm dams, impoundments and dugouts, are small, constructed waterbodies.
Livestock manure and fertilizer often accumulate in these waterbodies, creating ideal conditions for methane production. 2/11 nature.com/articles/s4324…
In recent years, @IPCC_CH has been encouraging the inclusion of agricultural ponds in national GHG inventories.
However, there is little data about the number and distribution of these ponds worldwide. 3/11 ipcc.ch/report/2019-re…
Notice anything different? We've launched new categories on our website! Take a look at what's new ⤵️
If you click on the "agriculture" tab, you'll find investigative and explanatory journalism exploring agriculture, food systems, sustainable farming, food waste, aquaculture, industry and workers by writers like @JessLReid and @HamlettClaire: sentientmedia.org/agriculture
If you click on "climate" you'll find coverage exploring climate issues, the environment, pollution, oceans, wildlife, industry and justice by writers including @jennysplitter & @zane_crittheory: sentientmedia.org/climate