It's good to see people getting more critical about cashless society, but often their main concern is about governments doing surveillance of our digital payments. In reality, there are at least 9 other reasons to fight cashless society, all of which are just as important (1/10)
1) Corporate data exploitation: It's true that Big Brother states exploit payments data, but 'Big Bouncer' corporates spy on your payments data to decide if you get access to things, while 'Big Butler' corporates use it to creepily manipulate you
2) Exclusion: Many people cannot access digital payments systems, or struggle to, and find themselves getting excluded. When the option to use cash is removed, they essentially start getting firewalled out of the economy (3/10)
3) Censorship: once you're dependent on the digital payments infrastructure, the oligopoly of big finance-tech firms that control it can choose to exclude you, freeze your account & prevent you paying for certain things. Cash creates a buffer against this possible dystopia (4/10)
4) Resilience: being totally dependent upon large-scale digital systems is extremely risky. Power outages, natural disasters, cyberattacks, systems failures, bugs and hacks can bring entire economies to a standstill when there's no cash backup. 'Cash doesn't crash' (5/10)
5) Spending & indebtedness: one of the big reasons why cashless society is promoted is that people spend 25-40% more with digital payment - this is good for big business, but not good for ordinary humans. See this thread for 10 studies showing this
6) Centralisation of economies: cash is associated with small-scale peer-to-peer transactions in local economies, whereas digital payment is a darling of globe-spanning digital mega-corporates. In a cashless economy, every local transaction must go via a central corporate (7/10)
7) Vibe: 'Cashless' economies *feel* different, because every interaction has to go via formal institutions. It's one element of a broader process of corporate gentrification that attacks more down-to-earth informal economies
8) Political capture: the banking sector is already 'too big to fail' & a cashless society only entrenches that, making us dependent upon bank accounts for almost everything. Rather than fighting for a strong public alternative, govts try onboard everyone into the banks (9/10)
9) Financial stability: Ironically, people only have trust in digital money because they believe it can be redeemed for cash. During crises people always run to the ATM, because cash is the only form of public money we can directly hold. Learn more here brettscott.substack.com/p/casino-chip-…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A pro-cash position is anti-corporate and anti-privatisation, because 'cashless' infrastructure is corporate and the digital money moved within it is privately issued by the banking sector.
Why then do I often seem to get more support from the far-right than the left? (1/9)
Is it because people who are suspicious of corporate power are increasingly being captured by far-right conspiracy narratives, while corporates coat themselves in a thin marketing veneer of left-liberalism, thereby enabling corporate power to be presented as 'leftist'? (2/9)
Is it because liberal-left-leaning urban professionals have bought into the progressive aesthetics of Big Tech and have internalised the culturally hegemonic ideology that corporate digital enclosure is 'progress'? (3/9)
USA is caught between West Coast tech titans & East Coast finance barons who fuse via fintech. Physical cash blocks this merger, leading to anti-cash ideology, all while crypto speculation escalates. Here are 10 reasons to care (1/12)
1) The cash economy is demonized, yet it provides life support for millions of people who don't trust the banking sector, or who feel excluded by it. Remember that the 'cashless society' is a bank-dominated society, championed by the very institutions behind the 2008 crisis...
2) The mainstream digital payments system run by those banks enables both surveillance and payments control. With the rise of a Supreme Court pushing socially conservative prohibition laws, it's vital to hold onto a non-digital alternative. Here's @NathanTankus on that:
I've heard a lot of people claim that Bitcoin is somehow a unique weapon to protect yourself from inflation. The current #cryptocrash should make you doubt that, but I used to work in 'inflation hedging', so let me offer a perspective to help you decide for yourself. Thread 1/15
I used to work in 'inflation derivatives' markets. I'll explain what those are, but let me start by saying that during that time I learned that there are basically four ways to hedge yourself against inflation...
The first is to invest in something that has inbuilt legal protection against a rise in inflation. The most well-known example of this are 'inflation linked bonds', which are legally required to increase their payout as inflation goes up (see for example, investopedia.com/terms/t/tips.a…)
Here’s a somewhat philosophical take on the politics of money.
I'm fascinated by monetary systems because they simultaneously connect and separate us. They enable us to interact with distant strangers, but often at the expense of weakening our reliance on closer kin (1/14)
We work in huge depersonalised markets because we have huge depersonalised monetary systems that enable vast collectives of people - ‘the public’ - to operate as an interdependent economic web. But it makes a difference as to what form the units of money take (2/14)
A modern monetary system is made of two central components. The state issues physical cash, while the commercial banking sector issues digital IOUs (think of them as digital ‘chips’) that can transferred via card payments, but also redeemed back for cash at ATMs (3/14)
'Cashlessness' is often slowly engineered from the top down. Here's an example of how this happens:
In 2019 Visa entered into a sponsorship deal with the NFL, but made it dependent on the Super Bowl 'going cashless'... (1/11)
In 2020 this was pushed under the guise of helping people avoid contact during Covid, but this is BS. Not only have major health bodies rejected the thesis that cash spreads covid, but the NFL admitted that the 'decision to go cashless was in the works before the pandemic' (2/11)
Indeed, it was in 2019 that Visa told their investors how they'd use the NFL deal to basically force football lovers to use digital payments. “Looking ahead" they said, "we see a cashless future for NFL fans" (investor.visa.com/news/news-deta…) (3/11)
It's with deep joy that I present my new book to the world today. Cloudmoney: Cash, Cards, Crypto and the War for our Wallets.
What's it about? Cards seem convenient and crypto seems cool, but the book lays out a contrarian argument for why cash is more crucial than ever (1/20)
The book rejects the idea that a move towards a cashless society is a 'bottom up' phenomenon driven by us all. It shows why our decisions to ‘go cashless’ are often slowly engineered from the top down... (2/20)
This is what global inequality scholar and author @jasonhickel says about Cloudmoney... (3/20)