Here’s my theory: Art is ALL going to go AI. All film, all music, all animation, etc. And soon.
A friend of mine’s been messing around with AI animation on his IG acct. Another friend who’s an actress has been scanned more than once for films, where they can just use her image if she can’t make it to reshoots or something.
The most “successful” distributors of film, tv, and music aren’t even people who got into the entertainment business. They’re just tech bros with platforms that need content, any level of it is fine. Ok, we’ve seen that already.
But, I think we are going to see the making of “content” entirely via AI happen at a rapid pace. My God, if Netflix, etc can save the expense of the $4B they spend on shitty “content” & just have an algorithm make it instead, for free essentially, 24-7, it’s a big win for them.
Then you don’t even need the development execs. They can go back to just having coders and that’s it, with code generating “content.”
Then with that being “ready-to-wear,” if you will, and any human-made art, music, or film will be haute couture and will charge wealthy patrons large fees to see/listen/screen their work.
But, human-made art will no longer be for the masses, because greed pushed it out in favor of AI “content.” Or as a friend of mine puts it, “We’ll all go back to having our own personal jesters.”
I’ve been trying to bang the drum for years about “content” instead of actual films, but now that people have grown so accustomed to shitty “content,” they won’t notice the shift to AI “content.”
We will see the end of Art in our lifetime. If you haven’t noticed yet, this 20-yr trend of sequels, remakes, reboots, reposting, reblogging, repurposing other people’s work & pop-culture has resulted in an almost absence of really new art, music, film, etc, with few exceptions.
Look, it’s hard to disrupt something “in transition,” so we’re going to have to see this AI baby birthed before anything is going to be able to kill it. It’s going to be a comical “9 months” until that point.
BRB, going to read about the transition from the Dark Ages to the Renaissance of the 1300’s. (Dark Ages = ~900 years.) #HumanismRahRahRah
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Clearly the 2025 Oscars dress code was “Nude.” We’ll focus only on those who followed the “Nude” dress code directions. Many of the other attendees rebelled against the dress code and were heavily clothed. They took the risk of being denied entry to the event, and perhaps will not be invited back next year. 1/
Actress, model, and artist Julia Fox
- Ms. Fox comes the closest to delivering the dress code The Academy was seeking.
- We can see her chest bits clearly
- However, her downstairs is covered with a nude-colored undergarment, and a long hair piece, taking the look off-track.
- Next time use a merkin in place of the long hair piece.
- Good Lady Godiva reference. 2/
Singer and songwriter Megan Thee Stallion:
- The attempt to follow the dress code is split, with part of Ms. Stallion almost delivering, but with the other half of her denying it completely.
- On the top, she almost follows the rules, eschewing a top.
- On the bottom, the heavy opaque fabric is in complete conflict with the dress code.
- Even with the good adherence on top, the addition of the two green circles spoils the followthrough. 3/
Inauguration Fashion Roundup.
(Because there was a lot to look at.)
Thread. 1. Gold star for @IvankaTrump. Very classy in her green dress, coat, and hat. A second gold star for her @OscardelaRenta dress the other night.
2. 2nd Lady Usha Vance killed it in the pink @OscardelaRenta coat and dress. Extra star for the black velvet gown the other night.
3. @DrBiden looked terrific in her purple coat and dress.
True. And yet that negative result will serve to break up what needs to be broken, so something else can emerge. Something magnificent is happening. I know it sounds counterintuitive. Yes, gen #AI is one of the worst ideas society has ever come up with. Yes it will destroy jobs, and more importantly crush people’s sense of self and worth. However, what was borne of greed will happen to give way to something very special, something truly new.
When a certain structure is inflexible and is not shifting as it should (the arts, education, etc), then it needs to be destroyed. There is sometimes no other way for the truly new and unique to emerge, as it’s meant to.
Both things can be true: gen #AI is bad for our society, AND ALSO gen AI’s destruction will finally clear the structures that were too stubborn to allow The New.
Since the spring of 2023, I’ve been telling people how gen AI is fueled by greed and how it will cause destruction. I have said this knowing I can’t stop it. I have said this so that people aren’t surprised by the tsunami of AI infiltration into our systems and institutions. I also say it to point fingers at those tech bros, studio execs, CEOs, etc who worship money for having disregarded any respect for human effort and worth.
But the real prize here is what comes after. #AI is the next chapter, but it is not the last chapter. And it’s not even a very interesting chapter, compared with The New that comes after that. The dystopian films and books you’ve read and watched were just “set-ups” and not conclusions. There is something remarkable coming. Set your sights beyond the destruction, on The New. Something real and raw and very human. Don’t focus on the mountain that seems to be in the way, but lift your POV, so you can see the land beyond it.
#SocialMediaVideoCritique
- This one is a fresh piece.
- The actress is playing a bird who is crushed that "her family" (the birds who raised her) have left the nest.
- She takes this as an enormous rejection with "I'm (a) white (bird). I shouldn't be taking up space (in this nest)."
- We understand immediately that she has donned the beige cape of a Boreal or Elf owl to cover her white feathers and fit in. The actress' beige sweater neatly accomplishes this.
- The makeup department has done a great job in applying smudged black eye pencil under her eyes. We understand that the character tried to look more like a Boreal owl, by simulating their eye area markings.
- Cast pictures are below. Fin.
#SocialMediaVideoCritique
- We again have that overhead light issue, but the director tries to counter that by putting a brimmed cap on the actor.
- Unfortunately, this causes a diffused light on the actor’s face. Better to turn off the overhead light and set a key light on 1/
-… the actor’s face.
- The footage is out of focus. We see the knit of the sweater in focus, but not our actor’s face. Be sure to rehearse beforehand to set focal distance.
- There are distracting objects in the background, one behind his head and one camera right. 2/
-… These pull the attention from the actor.
- The actor did not memorize his lines and we can see him reading from the cue cards. If this is necessary in your production, consider an earpiece through which the lines can be fed. Or shoot the scene in smaller, easy-to-memorize 3/
Decompressing from walking on eggshells for the past four years.
I have found the last four years to be an almost intolerable period. A very un-American period in that any questioning, any opinions, any likes or dislikes were held up to a very limited list of “permitted positions” in order to assess acceptability. 2/
I’ve never in my life known that to be an American environment. It’s an environment I have encountered in smaller groupings (a church, a private club,a clique), but never before as a national blanket. It has been suffocating. Common sense was discarded, intellectual discussion 3/