Up until 2003, the world had only ever seen four human coronaviruses (HCoVs).

In just 20 years, three new HCoVs emerged: SARS, MERS, & SARS2.
The original four HCoVs were mild. They cause "the common cold" (along with some other viruses).

The new HCoVs are killers.

Mortality rate of SARS 9.4%.
Mortality rate of MERS 34.4%.
Mortality rate of SARS2 is evolving & age-dependent. ~30 million ppl have died already.
The original four HCoVs cause symptoms for 1 to 2 weeks.

The new HCoVs often cause significant post-infection sequelae.

Long SARS, Long MERS, & Long CoVID can last months, years or even a lifetime.
The original four HCoVs are seasonal. They typically infect ppl in winter months.

The new HCoVs are NOT seasonal. They can infect in any season.
The original four HCoVs have a low rate of transmission, R0 ~ 1 to 2.

The new HCoVs have a high rate of transmission.

SARS2 in particular started higher, ~2.3 to 3.4, & has been rapidly increasing transmissibility.
By 2022 it was already estimated to have an R0 ~ 18.6.
Explosive human growth & encroachment on animal habitats as well as proliferation of BSL3 & 4 labs & GoF research are two plausible reasons for the eruption of new & deadly HCoVs.

Both are likely to continue.

And so is emergence of new HCoVs.
One new HCoV? Hmm, OK.

Two new HCoVs? That's more than coincidence.

Three new HCoVs? That's a trend. A very disturbing trend.
When will the 4th new HCoV emerge?

Some ppl suggest it already has because SARS2 has mutated so far from Wild Type it could be called SARS3.

If not now, it soon will emerge as there are over 1,000 variants being tracked now and the pace of evolution is quickening.
When will the next HCoV make the jump from nature or leak from a lab?

That's also likely not too far behind.

This isn't over. In fact it's just beginning.

#DavosSafe
#WearARespirator
PS - The original four HCoVs could be stopped with surgical masks.

The new HCoVs, especially SARS2, can't be.

Higher level of transmission requires a higher level of respiratory protection.

#WearARespirator

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Barry Hunt - #DavosSafe

Barry Hunt - #DavosSafe Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BarryHunt008

Feb 19
A 2021 Systematic Review showed...

N95s reduced SARS / SARS2 infections in HCWs by 96% over unmasked.

N95s reduced SARS / SARS2 infections in HCWs by 83% over surgical masks.

Those numbers make sense. They pass the sniff test.
But this Systematic Review and the Case Control studies involved were rejected by the recent Cochrane review on masks.

Huh 🤔
Here's the study.

It's very clear N95s work against both SARS & SARS2.

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/em…
Read 19 tweets
Feb 19
When it comes to SARS2, we're in "BECAUSE I SAY SO" land.

'Experts' make claims that are completely unfounded.

Many claims have been disproven but still they continue.
"COVID is not airborne"

BECAUSE I SAY SO
"N95s are no better than surgical masks"

BECAUSE I SAY SO
Read 33 tweets
Feb 18
They said SARS2 wasn't airborne.

And SARS1.
And MERS.
And Smallpox.
And Chicken Pox.
And Measles.
And TB.

Until proven otherwise.
Every bacteria & virus & fungus can be aerosolized.

Pathogens found in respiratory tract can transmit human-to-human by airborne route.
Pathogens found in alimentary tract can be transmitted human to toilet flush to human by airborne & airborne / oral-fecal route & airborne / fomite route.
Read 6 tweets
Feb 14
BREAKING NEWS:

/s
"Half-measures don't work." - unknown
"Figures don't lie but liars do figure." - Mark Twain
Read 8 tweets
Feb 14
If you can extract $1M in funding to perform an ill-designed study deemed by many to be unethical that ignores previous science while supporting a contested healthcare policy, a lawsuit, & a career long ideology now known to the world to be wrong, it raises some questions.
Maybe there's more of a connection to the funders than has been disclosed? 🤷‍♂️
Maybe there's more behind the study initiative & study design than science?
🤷‍♂️
Read 9 tweets
Feb 14
"Yes, masks reduce the risk of spreading COVID, despite a review saying they don't"

There are a lot of questions here to be answered.
theconversation.com/yes-masks-redu…
Why is there an 'academic' group pushing back against respirators?

Why do they keep referencing each other's work while excluding studies showing respirators work?

Why are the reviewers & authors from the same pool?
Why is the anti-respirator group advising @WHO?

Why does the @WHO listen to them & exclude evidence that respirators work?
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(