Good to see some of this work out in the public domain. Myself and Professor Leslie Howe surveyed 25, and interviewed 10, Canadian high performance athletes, past and present, including 8 Olympians. It was an honour and a privilege to document the views of these superb women. 1/
We are, at present, writing up this work for academic publication. Probably two papers because of the richness of the data. We are using a human rights framework given the Canadian human rights infrastructure protects the human rights of females on the basis of sex. 2/
This includes the human rights to freedom of expression, non-discrimination and equality of opportunity, on the basis of sex.
Thanks to Coach Blade @coachblade for discussing our work in this article for the @MLInstitute. 3/
Here is a taster of the Project. The athletes. 4/
4/ On human rights, sex, and gender identity.
5/ On sex and gender identity.
6/ On sex and gender identity. The importance of categories based on sex.
7/ On the right to recognition of biological sex.
8/ On the 2021 IOC Framework.
9/ More IOC Framework questions.
10/ Comments re 2021 IOC Framework.
11/ On category solutions.
12/ Additional questions of interest.
13/ Related comments.
14/ The three athletes who thought the survey was 'transphobic'.
There is so much data that this is just a glimpse. The interviews lasted between 30 mins and 2.5 hours. These athletes had a lot to say. 15/
@letsgetitbetter @coachblade For those who are interested, the survey was leaked last year and a lobbying group outside of Canada tried to get it cancelled. Information here:
TW 'transitioned during lockdown at 62 years old after living the majority of her life as her assigned sex at birth.'
"I need to wear a female swimming costume despite having to compete with the men, which 'outs' me as a woman who is transgender."
Really? readingchronicle.co.uk/news/25241452.…
Is it likely that a male who 'fully transitions' at 62 will 'pass' as female?
I think not.
In any case, I presume the Open category permits females to 'compete up' & so if this TW does 'pass' surely the gents will assume this is the case.
Then:
"I came second in that race."
"The woman who came first was a whole length ahead of me. She broke the European record; she's an excellent swimmer.
"This is not a trans person coming in and nicking places from other people."
What about the woman who should have come 2nd?
'The new rules come in to play on April 1 and allow transgender women to feature in amateur competitions if they have had reduced testosterone levels for at least a year.'
FFS.
Bunch of sexist dinosaurs. dailymail.co.uk/sport/football…
'20 transgender women are currently registered to play amateur football in England, and they can continue to do so if their testosterone levels have been below 5nmol per litre for at least 12 months'.
'Transgender women (male-born individuals who identify as women) with suppressed testosterone retain muscle mass, strength, and other physical advantages compared to females; male performance advantage cannot be eliminated with testosterone suppression'. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/sm…
'She has not undergone and consequently has not failed any ‘gender verification’ or ‘gender eligibility tests’ '.
Oh dear.
Not reassuring.
The very reason advocates for biological males in female sport object to sex screening.
No test no -ve result. 1/ theguardian.com/football/2025/…
But @SuzyWrack ticks all the untenable bases: 1. Hateful transphobic racist language 2. 'Not fitting westernised standards of femininity' 3. 'The science on testosterone levels in women of different ethnicities, and in female athletes of different ethnicities, is limited' 2/
The public now know following the 2024 Olympic boxing fiasco, that international sport governance relies on 'passport sex' not 'biological sex' (yes I'm looking at @FIFAcom).
So is it any wonder spectators kick off?
The solution is a universal once in a career sex screen. 3/
'Democrats privately admit they need a sharper response to counter Republican attacks on their support for transgender rights, especially when it involves sports.' 1/ axios.com/2025/03/07/sen…
'Some Senate Democrats agreed with Newsom on the sports fairness issue, but they said to be careful that the overall conversation doesn't demonize transgender athletes. They also want to avoid federal overreach.' 2/
'Senate Democrats want to leave the issue of trans athletes playing in women's sports to state and local governments.'
This is not good enough @SenateDems. It perpetuates the 'culture war' at state & local level. If it's not fair in one state it's not fair in all states. 3/
'Sarkar reserves some of her snarkiest comments for left-liberals seduced by identity politics.'
'Mired in fratricidal identitarianism, left-liberals have lost the argument to the hard right'.
Speechless.
The brass neck. theguardian.com/books/2025/feb…
But does @AyoCaesar include herself in this?
Ofc not.
'Ash Sarkar blames the rightwing press for this shift. Thanks to tabloid agents provocateurs and their political creatures in Westminster, she says, the lower orders have abandoned class war for the culture wars.'
@AyoCaesar Apparently:
'More and more of them spend their weekends not on the barricades but behind computer screens, fuming over small boats and gender ideology.'
New...
'World Athletics today launched a new consultation process on its eligibility conditions for the Female Category and the current DSD Regulations and Transgender Regulations.'
Good.
Present regulations permit XY DSD athletes in female sport with T suppression to <2.5nmols/L
WA Working Group submitted the following five recommendations to Council in December 2024 which were approved and are now set for consultation:
'World Athletics President Sebastian Coe said: “World Athletics is a leader in preserving the female category in sport and one of the first international sports federations to establish clear policies on female eligibility in elite sport.'