What Sanjay Leela Bhansali calls a “beautiful world of Heera Mandi”, might have witnessed the painful tears of so many Hindu women during the Mughal rule & then under Ahmed Shah Abdali
(Thread)
Hira mandi, comes from the name of Heera Singh Dogra, who had set up a mandi/vegetable market in this place, was earlier named as shahi mohalla when it was started by Mughals at lahore, as a place for tawaifs or concubines.
Source: Hari Singh Dogra, 19th cent, Christie’s
This is where Hindu Kathak Dancers were brought & made to dance to entertain the mughals rulers.
Ofcourse we dont have to guess how the kathak dancers ended up in tawaif kothas during Mughal era.
Thus Kathak that used to narrate the tales of Shri krishna during Bhakti movement was reduced to a dance of tawaifs to entertain the Mughal rulers.
But till the mughal era it was only limited to entertainment via dance. Then came Ahmed Shah Abdali, notorious for capturing, enslaving & selling Hindu Girls.
Source: legacy of Muslim rule in India, K.S lal
He massacred many hindu villages & captured turned the captured women into sεχ slaves n brought them to the so called Sanjay leela Bhansali’s “beautiful world of Heera Mandi. Heera Mandi turned to be the world of sεχ trafficking of helpless hindu girls.
The world of heera mandi, far from being beautiful, is actually tainted with horror. It stood as a witness to 1000s of Hindu women’s sagas of misery & humiliation. These women often were from noble families & elite classes.
From: Mughal Harem, etsy
A French author Claudine Le Tourneur d’Ison in her Book Hira Mandi, though mostly fiction, had described that girls were initiated n this kothas as early as 11 year old thus continuing the ραεδορhilic culture.
In pic: Claundine at hira mandi.
A hindu Sanjay Leela Bhansali glorifying the helplessness & miseries of some of our ancestors is mockery & humiliation of every Hindu. Shame on Hindus like Sonakshi Sinha to even portray such character.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵Romila Thapar says Omitting Mughals from textbooks is “nonsense.”
Did you know?
There was a scandal in ICHR where a historian's manuscript vanished & later found plagiarised by someone in ICHR itself.
The historian died without recieving recognition & royalty for his work.
This is the same ICHR which chose Romila Thapar as its council 4 times.
Apparently omitting "Mughals" from textbook is Nonsense but omitting credit & Royalty of another Historian who wasn't part of the Marxist ecosystem isn't.
In the 1970s, historian Dr. Parmatma Saran submitted an English translation of Tarikh-i-Akbari to the ICHR under an approved project.
ICHR’s own Annual Reports (1976–77, 1977–78) explicitly list the manuscript as received and completed.
Years later, when questions were raised about publication, ICHR suddenly claimed the manuscript was “not traceable.”
Dr. Saran died without seeing his work published, credited, or paid for.
Hilarious empty rhetoric! U didn't even research primary sources by British themselves
Myth 1: The British provided better education by dismantling Gurukuls.
Fact: 1. Surveys done by the British themselves shows the Indian method of studies in its indigenous schools was superior to the British during the colonial regime.
2. In Contemporary England during the colonial regime there were hardly any thorough studies except in religious spheres.
3. The average period of schooling was hardly 1-2 years.
4. In fact it was the Indian method of studies that actually helped the introduction of popular education in England that existed in India for centuries.
5. In some country schools of England, writing was excluded for fear of evil consequences.
6. The British only wanted to replace Indian schools with their own so that they could uproot indian civilization to bring people to an institutionalised, formal, law-abiding Christianity.
Myth 2: The British built Indians the first true universities
Fact: Vedic universities like Nalanda, Vikramshila, Takshashila, Odantpuri were not only highly formalised, they were famous all over the world & many foreigners used to come to study there.
Myth 3: Indians were able to discover Indus valley due to John Marshall
Fact: It was actually a Hindu Brahmin Rakhaldas Banerjee who first discovered IVC. Marshall got him shifted to snatch the entire credit.
Myth 4: British standardised Indian dialects and Grammar.
Fact: Heard about Panini? He had formalised Sanskrit Grammar in such a superior way that British themselves used to think not learning Sanskrit scriptures will be a dis-service to themselves.
William Jones:
"Sanskrit is of wonderful structure more perfect & refined than Greek or latin"
Modiji: Macaulay ne Bharat ko apne jad se ukhadne ke beej boye the (through English education system)
Ruchika: That never happened.
Macaulay: Clown Ruchika, i exactly said that.
No Hindoo who has ever received an English education ever remains sincerely attached to his religion. Some profess themselves as pure deist, some embrace Christianity. It is my firm belief that if our plan of education are followed up, there will not be a single idolater among the respectable classes.
And this will be effected without any efforts to proselytize.
Modiji has more knowledge in History than this self proclaimed Historian. What Macaulay wanted to achieve is evident in illiterate like Ruchika who has no knowledge of history & no sense of her roots.
Her entire video is not based on any primary sources but from writings of British stooges like Phule & Ramabai.
Let's debunk her lies.
Ruchika's claim :
Education was only limited to upper castes
Fact check:
Surveys done by the British themselves debunk this lie as Shudra scholars were the highest in number amongst Hindus.
He erased half the planet because he can’t read a history book😂
Here's you history lesson about Existence of India before British came to loot us.
GREEK SOURCES:
1. Greek ambassador Megasthenes wrote about India in the 3rd century BCE before your Christ was born.
Here's a Map as per the description of Megasthenes.
2. Greco-Roman astronomer Ptolemy mentioned the country as India clearly in the 2nd century CE.