Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
SagasofBharat Profile picture
SagasofBharat
@SagasofBharat
Art || Aesthetics || History || Food || And everything that comes to my mind || Alt @miirabelle999 🚫NO DMS
Apr 1 • 6 tweets • 3 min read
Did you know?

The Shroud of Turin-often believed to be the burial cloth of Jesus Christ is actually a MEDIAEVAL HOAX

There is no credible evidence linking it to Jesus. Research shows the cloth originated almost 1200 years after Jesus.

And here's your evidence [THREAD]Image In 1988, three different laboratories performed a radiocarbon analysis of the Shroud of Turin.

All three laboratories independently dated the cloth to 1260–1390 CE -conclusively placing it in the medieval period.

That's roughly 1200-1300 years after the assumed time of Jesus. Image
Image
Mar 23 • 7 tweets • 3 min read
Title: Can Hindus eat Beef
Then proves Hindus are non-vegetarians.

Bro Non-veg ≠ beef

Hindus are against Cow slaughter from Vedic times (SS 1)
to Mohandas Gandhi (SS 2).
Father of nation cancel now?

Punishment for cow slaughter has always been brutal in India [THREAD] Image
Image This is what Ibn Battuta wrote:

"Killing or eating a cow was strictly forbidden; anyone caught doing it were punished with death in this country"

That has always been the stance of Hindus from Vedic times. Image
Mar 18 • 8 tweets • 4 min read
Dear illiterate,

Mughals invested everything they had?

Their own autobiography says they had nothing to invest. But came to Hindustan to loot.

Thread 👇🏼- Dismantling both the myth:

1. Mughals invested everything they had
2. "Rajput-blood" made Mughals, Indian Image
Image -Babur himself says in his autobiography he was in great poverty, so he slaughtered Hindus to take their lands.

-Shahjahan didn't commission Taj Mahal with money from his own pocket.
He charged exorbitant taxes from peasants & selling their women & children as slaves. Image
Image
Image
Image
Mar 17 • 6 tweets • 5 min read
Wrong!

India’s GDP:
Before Mughals -33%
After Mughal loot- 24-16%

Mughal court physician, Bernier exposes your lies. He records a steady drain of India’s gold and silver under Mughal rule.

THREAD on how much each Mughal sent India’s wealth to other Islamic nations. 👇🏼 Image
Image
Image 1. BABUR used to distribute the wealth looted from Bharat to every tribe of Afghan, Hazara, arab, Biluch etc.

Valuables were sent to Samarkand, khurasan, kashaghar & Iraq.

Source: Babur’s own Autobiography Babur Nama.

Huge amounts of almost 3-4 lakhs were being sent to Kabul Image
Image
Image
Jan 27 • 9 tweets • 4 min read
🧵Romila Thapar says Omitting Mughals from textbooks is “nonsense.”

Did you know?

There was a scandal in ICHR where a historian's manuscript vanished & later found plagiarised by someone in ICHR itself.

The historian died without recieving recognition & royalty for his work.

This is the same ICHR which chose Romila Thapar as its council 4 times.

Apparently omitting "Mughals" from textbook is Nonsense but omitting credit & Royalty of another Historian who wasn't part of the Marxist ecosystem isn't.Image
Image In the 1970s, historian Dr. Parmatma Saran submitted an English translation of Tarikh-i-Akbari to the ICHR under an approved project.

ICHR’s own Annual Reports (1976–77, 1977–78) explicitly list the manuscript as received and completed. Image
Jan 17 • 8 tweets • 3 min read
As we are talking about Nalanda,
Attaching below all my previous posts where i categorically dismantled the lies peddled by Ruchika Sharma on Nalanda.

I am blocked by her. So feel free to use my posts wherever she lies. 👇🏼 Image
Image Confession from eye-witness account clearly mentioning the religion that destroyed Nalanda.

Jan 7 • 5 tweets • 4 min read
Hilarious empty rhetoric! U didn't even research primary sources by British themselves

Myth 1: The British provided better education by dismantling Gurukuls.

Fact:
1. Surveys done by the British themselves shows the Indian method of studies in its indigenous schools was superior to the British during the colonial regime.

2. In Contemporary England during the colonial regime there were hardly any thorough studies except in religious spheres.

3. The average period of schooling was hardly 1-2 years.

4. In fact it was the Indian method of studies that actually helped the introduction of popular education in England that existed in India for centuries.

5. In some country schools of England, writing was excluded for fear of evil consequences.

6. The British only wanted to replace Indian schools with their own so that they could uproot indian civilization to bring people to an institutionalised, formal, law-abiding Christianity.Image
Image
Image
Image Myth 2: The British built Indians the first true universities

Fact: Vedic universities like Nalanda, Vikramshila, Takshashila, Odantpuri were not only highly formalised, they were famous all over the world & many foreigners used to come to study there.

Myth 3: Indians were able to discover Indus valley due to John Marshall

Fact: It was actually a Hindu Brahmin Rakhaldas Banerjee who first discovered IVC. Marshall got him shifted to snatch the entire credit.Image
Image
Dec 8, 2025 • 10 tweets • 5 min read
Modiji: Macaulay ne Bharat ko apne jad se ukhadne ke beej boye the (through English education system)

Ruchika: That never happened.

Macaulay: Clown Ruchika, i exactly said that.

No Hindoo who has ever received an English education ever remains sincerely attached to his religion. Some profess themselves as pure deist, some embrace Christianity. It is my firm belief that if our plan of education are followed up, there will not be a single idolater among the respectable classes.

And this will be effected without any efforts to proselytize.

Modiji has more knowledge in History than this self proclaimed Historian. What Macaulay wanted to achieve is evident in illiterate like Ruchika who has no knowledge of history & no sense of her roots.Image
Image Her entire video is not based on any primary sources but from writings of British stooges like Phule & Ramabai.

Let's debunk her lies. Image
Dec 6, 2025 • 10 tweets • 3 min read
Did you know?

Aurangzeb’s own granddaughter referred to the Ram Janmabhoomi temple as “Sita ki Rasoi” in her book Bahadurshahi.

When Muslims first objected to Shri Ram’s worship there before the British, they themselves called the site “Janmasthan.”

Whose Janmasthan was it - Babur’s?

All my previous threads on Ram Mandir expose the real history of Ram Janmabhoomi.
Read on 👇🏼Image Thread 1:
•Aurangzeb's own Grand-daughter referred to Ram Janmabhoomi as "sita ki Rasoi"
• They tried hiding the truth but couldn't

Nov 19, 2025 • 5 tweets • 4 min read
He erased half the planet because he can’t read a history book😂

Here's you history lesson about Existence of India before British came to loot us.

GREEK SOURCES:

1. Greek ambassador Megasthenes wrote about India in the 3rd century BCE before your Christ was born.
Here's a Map as per the description of Megasthenes.

2. Greco-Roman astronomer Ptolemy mentioned the country as India clearly in the 2nd century CE.

(CONT)Image
Image
Image
Image CHINESE SOURCES:

3. Chinese pilgrim Faxian documented his travels in India between 4th-5th century

4. Chinese pilgrim Xuanzang wrote extensively about India in the 7th century CE.Image
Image
Image
Image
Oct 13, 2025 • 9 tweets • 5 min read
This thread proves why Europeans are still not civilized. They are defending a savage Columbus in 2025.

Let's debunk this fraudulent whitewashing piece by piece. 🧵 Image Columbus invading America wasn't an act of bravery He risked himself for greed.

The Capitulations of Santa Fe was a contract between Catholic Monarch & Columbus which promised him 10% share of everything he captures in his conquest.

Image
Oct 2, 2025 • 7 tweets • 4 min read
1. When the British set foot in India, they didn’t “become Indian.”

This is what they did - turned Indians into skeletons with their man-made famines. If this isn't colonialism should Indians do the same to you?

Indians actually benefit you. 🧵 Image 2. British colonisers used Rape as a weapon. They dragged Indian women into camps, mass-raped them, forced them into brothels for troops.

Hindu diaspora Commits the least crime in UK. Image
Image
Image
Image
Sep 8, 2025 • 17 tweets • 9 min read
Momedan terrorists attacked National emblem at Hazratbal, calling it blasphemy.

Do you know what this shrine is famed for?

A hair- Prophet's hair

If damaging Ashok Emblem shocks u here's a story how they once had unleashed nationwide riots & Hindu Genocide over this hair. Image
Image Syed Abdullah Madani, a supposed descendant of Mohd, brought a Hair to India & claimed that it was Islamic Prophet Mohd's hair- Moi-e-Muqqaddas

That hair is worshipped at Hazratbal Dargah.

So much for "Idol worship is against our religious beliefs" Image
Image
Sep 3, 2025 • 17 tweets • 11 min read
Do you know why the West - from the British Raj to Navarro today - keeps targetting Brahmins?

Reason- Brahmins led revolts, guarded knowledge, and were the biggest impediment to conversions.

The fear that haunted the 1800s still drives the hate now - here's the history.Image
Image Reason 1:

It was mostly Brahmins who revolted against the British. Image
Image
Image
Image
Aug 31, 2025 • 15 tweets • 7 min read
Did you know?

The claim that India was richest under the Mughals is the biggest JNU-manufactured scam.

India was the world’s largest economy long before Mughals were born- they didn’t enrich us, they looted our wealth to fund Islamic empires abroad.

Let's debunk this myth. Image
Image Here's Angus Maddison’s global GDP data that blow up the JNU myth.

India’s share of world GDP:

1 CE → 33%

1000 CE → 29%

1500 CE → 25%

The data shows India was already the world’s largest economy for 1500+ years before the Mughals even arrived. Image
Jul 30, 2025 • 14 tweets • 9 min read
Gems of Akbar's Debauchery

Ruchika the historian with a PhD is asking for the source of 5000 inmates in Akbar's Harem.

It's literally Ain-i-Akbari written by his own court Historian Abul Fazl.

If that's not the first book you read on Akbar it's time to revoke your degree.Image
Image Here’s Abul Fazl in Ain-i-Akbari confirming Akbar had 5000 women in his harem.

Not all royal wives-some were freeborn while many were slaves married without consent.

But sure, Ruchika the "feminist" sees no problem in shielding such a man. Image
Image
Jul 17, 2025 • 5 tweets • 2 min read
Ruchika asks NCERT where it is written that Jiziya is an incentive to convert.

The concept of jizya in Quran (9.29) targets those who refuse to convert. It is meant to humiliate non-Muslims.

Islamic commentator Al-Zamakhshari echoes the same - jizya should be made so heavy and degrading that people convert just to escape the shame and burden.”Image
Image This was followed during the time of Mughals as well

-Non muslim taxpayer should himself come to pay the tax.

-Non muslim will stand while the muslim collector should be seated.

-the hands of the non Muslim should be below the Muslim to show their inferiority. Image
Jul 6, 2025 • 6 tweets • 4 min read
I am surprised so many people didn't even read Ramayana?

Let me try & educate:

Myth 1: Ram never cared about surpanakha's appearance.

Reality: Shri Ram & Lakshman literally made fun of Surpanakha's appearance in Aranya Kanda sarga 18. Image
Image
Image Myth 2: Sita was from Nepal & naturally brown skinned

Sita was from Mithila mentioned in Ramayana many times.

Shri Ram explicitly described Sita In Ramayana having smooth skin & complexion like rose apple.

(So She was Definitely not pimple faced like Sai pallavi.) Image
Image
Jun 24, 2025 • 8 tweets • 4 min read
Do u know?

Sometime back Amir Khan's son Junaid made a propaganda movie, criticizing social practices of Hinduism.

In the movie Junaid's character questions why Hindu women wear Ghunghat.

Have u seen them questioning Burqa the same way? Image
Image
Image Of course the father son duo will never question the practice of Burqa but want Hindu women uncovered.

I don't have to tell you the history why Mohamedans always want Hindu women uncovered.

Jun 19, 2025 • 9 tweets • 5 min read
Is it a new trend now to paint Portuguese colonization as romantic?

Cute.

Meanwhile in Goa, the Portuguese Inquisition was a 250-year-long horror show of public burnings, mutilations, and mass conversions.

Let’s break the fantasy. Image When Portuguese Inquisitors landed in Goa, their mission was clear: uproot Paganism and replace it with Catholicism.

The natives—proud and rooted in Dharma— obviously resisted.

So what did the church do? Image
Jun 8, 2025 • 7 tweets • 3 min read
1. The concept of Ahimsa comes from Vedas itself before any other religion existed. Ahimsa is considered a virtue in many Hindu scriptures.

2. There are Many Verses in Vedas that suggest the prohibition of Cow slaughter. Image The concept of Ahimsa was first mentioned in Rig veda. Image
Image
Image