Joel Rainey.    ن Profile picture
Feb 22 18 tweets 5 min read
Aside from introducing me to the Lord Jesus, one thing the #SBC gave me that I'll always be thankful for is a fierce loyalty to the local church.
It is precisely that loyalty that at this moment puts me at odds with the denom I've been part of my entire life. A 🧵 (1)
The church I am privileged to serve as pastor has also been #SBC since it was planted in 1986. But discussions/decisions/declarations in recent years leave me wondering if we are still truly valued by this larger family of churches. (2)
Less than a year ago, I invited my friend @aimeebyrdPYW to address our church in the AM services, and our ladies that evening. This had nothing to do with the controversy she was facing. She was (still is) a neighbor (lives 30 minutes away), and ...(3)
I had just finished her new book on the Song of Songs and believed she had something to say to us in the middle of a culture with so much sexual confusion. She did a phenomenal job, and our people were enriched by her teaching. (4)
Less than a week later, both she and I were excoriated in public. @CBMWorg leadership, without so much as a phone call or text to either of us, dragged us on social media, decrying "women in the pulpit,"etc. (5)
Here's the thing: I've been pastor here 7 years. In that entire time we've had FIVE sisters speak to us on a Sunday morning on SIX total occassions. I respect folks who don't think that's right, but it could hardly be called a "pattern." (6)
Plus, we didn't get attention for it until Aimee, which quickly brought me to this conclusion: This wasn't about a woman in the pulpit. It was about WHICH woman it was, and the questions she raised toward some awfully thin-skinned men. We were both punished for that. (7)
8 months after that, our church hosted Glenn Stanton from Focus on the Family to speak more specifically to parents and teens, as well as our whole church on how to love our LGBT neighbors while continuing to counter harmful LGBT ideology. (8)
We took a number of hits from our own community for that one, as expected. But it was at that point that I began thinking: "I don't think there is a single SBC entity head who would have my church's back right now." (9)
Why wouldn't the #SBC have our backs on an issue we are in lock-step on? Why would a people and pastor suspect that they wouldn't? Because my experience in recent years has taught me to believe that too many are far more concerned with image than reality. (10)
It's because "guilt by association" scares the daylights out of too many denominational leaders more afraid of being labeled "liberal" than actually being found unfaithful to Jesus. (11)
And the one that breaks my heart most is my own alma mater @SBTS. I wouldn't trade anything for the years I spent under those beech trees in Louisville. They made me who I am, though I don't suspect their President is very proud of that fact right now. (12)
But why would I send someone there? I currently have 11 men in a pastoral residency--teaching them how to shepherd God's people. Some of them will be elders at Covenant. Others we may add to the staff. Others still we may send to plant/pastor other churches. (13)
If I send them to a seminary and they return at odds with me over secondary or teriary issues, I'm a big boy and can handle that. Additionally, there are still so many wonderful, godly professors at my alma mater. (14)
But there is also so much invective coming from too many leaders there, and it raises a caution flag in my soul. Would my alma mater actually train someone to return to Shepherdstown, not just to disagree, but to see their church and pastor as an "enemy?" (15)
So when some of us react negatively to the @SBCExecComm decision around @Saddleback yesterday, its not merely because we disagree. In fact, perhaps this IS the right decision in the end. But the process short-cuts needed conversations and moves right to floor-fights. (16)
And it leaves a whole swath of us out here who are more conservative than Rick Warren wondering "are we next?" That's the reality. And I say this because in my conversations with many SBC pastors, I know my church is far from the only congregation with these concerns. (17)
#SBC leadership has some work to do here. And at base, its not even theological. It's relational. And this denomination is failing spectacularly. And given all they have given me--all that I frankly owe them, it makes me very, very sad. (18, end)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Joel Rainey. ن

Joel Rainey.    ن Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @joelrainey

Feb 21
Liberal democracy isn’t going to be saved by forcing progressive narratives on the country. It also won’t be saved by government officials leveraging authoritarianism.
You can’t fix liberal University indoctrination by replacing it with conservative government indoctrination (1)
The free exchange of ideas is fundamental to ongoing liberty—neither government nor the academy have any business silencing anyone. Their role is to curate an environment that encourages exactly the opposite. (2)
I don’t question Gov Desantis’ motives. I’d agree with him that enforced, oppressive progressive orthodoxy is a problem. And if I were a faculty member at a Florida institution I’d also be gearing up for a lawsuit against him for violating academic freedom. (3)
Read 4 tweets
May 9, 2022
Short 🧵
A few facts about #Roe that are getting lost:
1. Court decisions are not-and should not be—decided on the basis of what “most people want.” They are based on what does and does not constitute sound law. (1)
2, if Roe is overturned it will neither “end” nor “outlaw” abortion in the United States. It will simply shift the question of legality back to state legislatures. The question of Roe is not “should abortion be legal” but “who should decide if abortion should be legal?” (2)
3. Many of the passionate arguments made on both sides of this issue are presently moot, and will remain so until/unless Roe is overturned. Put another way, it’s the removal of Roe alone that makes our arguments mean anything at all. (3)
Read 10 tweets
Aug 11, 2021
THREAD:
Step One: Convince the church that faith is all about the individual soul, and that political and civil issues therefore have no place in the church. (1)
Step Two: Make absolutely everything a political and civil issue, effectively stealing the prophetic voice of the church from any subject. (2)
Step Three: In this new, hyper-politicized environment with no prophetic voice, begin the process of polarization by turning people with different views against each other. Make them all see "the other side" as the enemy. (3)
Read 7 tweets
Nov 11, 2020
Throughout the Scriptures, there is a lesson God's people have to learn over and over again. It is as inescapably clear that to deny or minimize it can only be the result of ignorance or willful disobedience. Character matters in leadership. (1)
Character, in the long-run, outweighs personality, charisma, skill, effectiveness, and it certainly outweighs the consequentialist, pragmatic ethics that cause people to put way too much faith in men with low character. (2)
We see this in the narrative of King Saul, of King Solomon, of both Jeroboam and Rehoboam, of Ahaz and Hezekiah. And we see it in the "prophets" who scratch the itching ears of these wicked rulers and encourage God's people to place their ultimate hope in temporary rulers. (3)
Read 7 tweets
Oct 7, 2020
I am pro-life. I find the Democratic platform on abortion to be beyond repulsive and an unconscionable attack on the very image of God.

But Republicans had control on that issue for 24 of the past 40 years. (1/2)
For six of those years they controlled all three branches of government. Planned Parenthood is still fully funded, no personhood amendment was even proposed, and Roe has been turned back by multiple GOP-appointed judges. (2/2)
The Republican Party is not—and has never been “pro-life.” It just uses abortion as a clobber issue for its evangelical followers. (3/2)
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(