It seems they have no idea what it actually means in Ukraine's fight to liberate it's territory from Russian occupation.
JDAM-ER has been in RAAF service since 2015, as well as being in production, so there is a RAAF tactical library the PSU can use.
5/18 dst.defence.gov.au/innovation/joi…
Only requirement for JDAM and JDAM-ER is to use Mil-Std-1760C connections on a smart pylon.
All the Ukrainian PSU has to do in order to toss bomb waves of JDAM-ER is replicate the AGM-88 HARM missile interface used for it's Mig-29's and Su-27's...
American JDAM's to Ukraine was announced many weeks ago but we have not seen any photos. So the initial operating capability & status are unknown.
But doing the JDAM-ER after generic JDAM will be easy-peasy, if it isn't simultaneous.
7/18
From one of the earlier links:
"The Key design objectives for the HdH (Hawker de Havilland now Boeing owned) product are lowest possible mass production cost, zero hardware changes to the existing GBU-31/32/35/38 tailkits, best possible performance, modularity, ease of
8/18
...maintenance and especially shortest possible assembly time in the field. The latter will be critical to user acceptance of the kit, the less time expended and the fewer errors in assembly when deployed in the middle of nowhere, the more popular the kit will be with...
9/18
...its users. The design philosophy is centred on producing a flexible product which can further grow as customers request additions. Should a customer pursue a high wing configuration, improved glide range, or a different wing sweep angle, the basic design is aimed at...
10/18
...accommodating such changes at the lowest incremental cost."
Short form: The Australian JDAM-ER glide kit was designed to be cheap, easy to mass produce, and for ease of installation with the minimum of tools.
11/18
Thus it will be easy for PSU ground crews at converted highway air bases to bolt together the JDAM-ER.
The Su-25, NATO code name Frogfoot, has eight weapons stations you can hang a 500lb GBU-38 JDAM bomb from.
12/18
Rather than a pair of PSU Su-25 flying low like this to get to the front.
They are going to instead be able to lob _16_ GBU-38's with HdH wing kits 10 km behind the front line - out of MANPADS range - into Russian Army positions up to 30km behind the front line.
The PSU gets to deliver USAF style SHOCK & AWE, Baby!
15/18
Does anyone doubt that a couple hundred GBU-38 carefully painted upon these Russian fortifications like this in a week's time would crack them open like a sledge hammer hitting an egg?
The M1070 Heavy Equipment Transporter is designed to carry a combat loaded M1A2 Abrams and it's crew. The truck cab is large enough for a driver, co-driver and 4-man tank crew.
The truck/trailer combination has 25 ton pull winch to drag a damaged Abrams on-board.
2/10
And in wartime, this capability is used to transport heavily damage Abrams to depot level repair facilities for damage beyond local unit repair capability.
A lessor used but often thought about capability is massing M1070 for long distance operational level repositioning
3/10
FYI, this is where I got the 40km JDAM-ER toss bomb range from in the last🧵:
"The AGW, as noted previously, can be delivered in level flight or tossed. For a 2,000 ft [610 metres] release low level toss at 45 degrees and 0.82 Mach, the weapon has a
The ability of the Su-24 to fly transonic on the deck in a low density integrated air defense environment means there are a lot of low level holes in radar coverage to lob a stick of glide bombs out of, at high speed, inside occupied Ukraine.
The PSU would be able to hit a number of just over 100 km Russian logistical targets with a 60 km low altitude penetration & JDAM-ER toss bomb attack profile.
This is going to be a mechanized logistics thread dealing with a frustration I am having with Western intelligence & OSINT analysis of Russian logistics.
We are going to start with this picture to calibrate on what real mechanized logistical infrastructure looks like.
1/22
The previous Goggle satellite photo clip and this one are of a Walmart Distribution Center in New Braunfels, Texas.
The previous tweet showed the center's hundred of trailer loading bays and this photo shows a pair of forklifts next to a small building as the same facility.
2/22
This is a US Army M777 Battalion motor pool at Fort Hood, Texas from Google maps (left).
There are several FMTV trucks in the central isle that are equipped with HIAB material handling equipment cranes.
One of the major questions for me in the Russo-Ukrainian War is why Russia hasn't used this sort of fast rail building equipment to link up LPR/DPR railways to Southern Ukraine railways in the time since the Kerch Straits Railway Bridge was cut?
It looks like the Southern Ukrainian road connecting Rostov on the Don to the Port of Berdyansk in Ukraine is collapsing from both overuse and a lack of Russian civil engineering effort to maintain it.
One of the reasons I kept hammering on the impending Russian frostbite non-battle casualties will be worse than WW2 US Army levels back in January is corruption.
Every military has problems with clothing & textiles corruption. It's a foundational military procurement fraud. 1/4
The problem with talking about such real life problems is a lot of Western intelligence is deeply invested in "Strong Russia" for Iron Rice bowl reasons.
Russian soldiers dying from exposure & frostbite from Russian Military clothing & textiles procurement fraud can't be...
2/4
...believed by such people until it is rubbed in their collective faces publicly in a way that cannot be denied without them looking like fools.
Just like the Russian Army's complete lack of pallets, forklifts & all terrain telehandlers in it's artillery logistics.
3/4