Want to do a quick thread about harmony bc I feel like this concept is useful in answering a lot of style-related questions: can you wear sneakers with a suit? Can you go sockless? What color shoes go with what? Etc. 🧵
First, what is harmony? Harmony is the idea that each part of your outfit works in concert with each other, creating a pleasing whole. A Chicago tailor once explained this to me as, "you don't want distracting elements in your outfit, as this detracts from you as a wearer."
1. Harmony in Formality
Let's run through the different types of harmony, starting with formality. Each element in your outfit should harmonize in terms of formality, going from the top of your head to your toes. Let's start with sneakers and suits.
When people ask if they can wear sneakers with suits, they are often talking about the dark worsted wool suit bc that's what they see in stores. This looks awful to me bc your eyes are immediately drawn downward, taking attention away from the wearer. Shoes become a gimmick
But not all suits are dark worsted business suits. They can be casual by virtue of their color or material (e.g. linen, cotton, or seersucker instead of dark wool). In this way, the formality of the suit and shoes are closer to each other, so nothing stands out. There is harmony
We also see this with tailoring + jeans. This outfit is awful: jeans worn with a white dress shirt, shiny tie, and suit jacket. There's a big disconnect btw the top and bottom halves of the outfit, it looks like he spilled something on his suit pants and changed out of them.
If u wear tailoring with denim, choose a sport coat, not a suit jacket. Jacket material should be casual: cotton, linen, tweed, or corduroy (tweed is easiest bc texture makes it obvs casual). Ditch the tie; choose a slightly more casual shirt. Now you've bridged gap in formality
Same with this question about whether you can go sockless. Don't wear a dark business suit without socks, esp if you're also wearing dress shoes. But if you're wearing a casual suit (e.g. cotton or corduroy in casual colors like brown), you can go sockless just fine.
2. Harmony in Color
Harmony is also important in terms of color. Bright or unusually colored shoes should not be worn with dark suits bc they drag the eye downward. The shoe color should support the outfit to create a pleasing whole.
I once mentioned this on a blog, and a reader went out and bought navy shoes to wear with his navy suits, which was 😔. Color theory here is about social practices, not the color wheel. Navy shoes stick out bc they're socially unusual.
If you have tan shoes, pair them with outfits where they don't feel like the center of attention. They can be worn with lighter-colored suits or sport coats, esp in the summertime. This is basically like wearing a grey suit with mid-brown shoes, but lightened a few shades overall
3. Harmony in Silhouette
There's also harmony in silhouette. This photo of John Tory made the rounds a couple of weeks ago because the disjunction between the top and lower halves of his silhouette are so striking (he's also wearing sneakers with a business suit, also bad)
Whether you're wearing a suit or sport coat + odd trousers, there should be some relationship between the top and bottom halves of your silhouette, so you're not broken into two jarring blocks. See the difference between President Hollande and Emperor Akihito here.
Many men will (reasonably) not want to wear pants as full as Akihito's. That's fine. But just make sure there's some harmony between your jacket and pants. The lines should flow smoothly, esp when viewed from the side.
4. Breaking the Rules
There are many instances where someone breaks these "rules" but still looks great. This can be an army field jacket over a tweed sport coat or an unexpected pair of bright red sneakers with a tailored summer outfit.
I think of clothing as language, not like throwing paint on canvas. There are general "rules" around grammar, but some people also write beautifully and creatively, while breaking rules. This doesn't mean language doesn't have "rules." Important thing is learning the language
The idea of harmony should be a starting point to help you understand when an outfit works and why, but also keep an eye out for outliers and appreciate how some people still make things work, despite not following those rules.
IMO, you're always safer off aiming for harmony: harmonizing between levels of formality, (social rules) around color, and silhouettes. Make sure each piece works as part of a coherent outfit and no single piece sticks out.
whoops, this tweet should say "cotton or linen," not "cotton or corduroy." I think going sockless with a corduroy suit would be weird since it's a fall/winter material. but not going to pay $8/month to edit this tweet.
I can tell you who goes to cobblers. And a bit about the trade. 🧵
In the 18th century, men got shoes from two types of people. The upper classes went to cordwainers, who measured feet and made shoes from scratch. The lower working-classes went to cobblers, who cobbled together shoes using scraps from salvaged pre-owned footwear.
A cobbler was also someone who repaired footwear. Hence the Middle English term cobeler ("mender of shoes") deriving from an early form of cobble ("to mend roughly, patch"). In shoemaking, cordwainers and cobblers were considered distinct trades. Cobbler was lower on the ladder.
An offhand comment about how Prince Harry doesn't dress very well seems to have stirred up his fans. So here's a thread on how both Harry and William don't dress well when compared to the older men in their family — and how this represents a broader decline in taste. 🧵
I should say at the outset that I don't care about the drama surrounding the Royal family. I don't care if you're Team Markle or Team Middleton or Team whatever. I am simply talking about clothes. The following is also not meant to be personal jabs; just an honest review.
The first thing to understand is that select members of royal family were incredible dressers. Most notable is Edward VIII, the Duke of Windsor. For a time, whatever he wore, others followed. He popularized cuffed trousers, belts, and a tailoring style known as the "drape cut."
When we zoom in on the wallet, we see the label "Saint Laurent Paris," a French luxury fashion house that became popular about ten years ago when Kanye started wearing the label. This was also when Hedi Slimane was at the company's creative helm.
For many young men at the time, Saint Laurent was their entry into designer fashion, partly because the designs were conceptually approachable (LA rocker, Hot Topic), while the Kanye co-sign made them cool and the prices signaled status (and for the uninformed, suggested quality)
When I was on a menswear forum, navy trousers were of great controversy. Discussions about them lasted many years, resulting in long-lasting rivalries. Sometimes people refrained from speaking about them out of fear of dredging up old debates.
First, I should state at the outset that there's no way to have this conversation without, in some way, speaking crudely about certain classes of people. I make no judgements about their worth or dignity. I am only describing the semiotics of men's dress.
Second, everything depends on your goals. Dress is not a science, so there are no overriding laws. Everything is contextual to culture. More on this later
Before we start, here are two outfits involving green sport coats. Which do you like better? Please choose before moving on.
I get this question a lot. I don't have strong views on how transmasc people should dress, but since I often get the question, I've thought about it a bit. Will share some thoughts in this thread. 🧵
My general feeling is that this question often approaches the idea of style from a perspective I don't share. I don't believe in approaching dress first from the perspective of body type. For instance, there are a lot of guides online that break down body types like this.
I disagree with this perspective because they always seem to be about forcing the person into one narrow ideal. So if you're short, they tell you how to wear certain things to give the illusion of height. Or if you're heavy, they say how you can dress to hide your weight.
I don't think people such as Hegesth are intentionally choosing to dress like this to signal they're "not like the swamp." I think we're simply in a generational change in terms of taste. Will show some examples. 🧵
A hundred years ago, men's dress was governed by time, place, and occasion (TPO). If you were of a certain social position and had to do a certain thing, you were expected to wear certain outfits. If you didn't know these rules, a tailor would tell you.
Over the course of the 20th century, these rules loosened, partly because society became more accepting of different social groups and their lifestyles (which is a good thing). By the close of the 20th century, the rise of business casual swept tailoring out of offices