Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture
Feb 23, 2023 24 tweets 10 min read Read on X
Holy Bat cheese. 🧀🧀🧀

The #ChatGPT confirms that #FastEddie Edward Holmes and the University of Sydney conspired to cover up an article referencing the PRRA epitope of the #modernagate furin cleavage site - in 2018.

Hold onto your hats! Image
The DOI referenced by the #ChatGPT does not exist. How so? The Chatbot is sure is exists. It knows everything.

This is the DOI search:


It goes to another paper altogether duckduckgo.com/?q=DOI%3A%2F%2…
Image
The chat bot confuses itself and repeats the same DOI Image
So there must be another link. Where does it resolve to?

A nature paper?
OK well this should be easy. Image
Here's that link. Try it.


"Page not found" nature.com/articles/s4142…
Image
The chat bot gets further confused and redirects to another unrelated paper.


Image
Image
Image
Image
No, I just want the Holmes 2018 article. Where is it?

Now it gets interesting.

"No longer available"?

A journal article?

It doesn't work like that, retracted articles are marked up as retracted but must stay on the record. Image
Now there is a retraction notice because of "issues with the data presented" but the retraction notice is the same dead link at @NatureMedicine

The access token link is also dead.

How can a retraction notice have been scrubbed?
Image
Image
But the chat bot provides the text that they have seen in the retraction notice (presumably from a cache)

"An investigation was conducted by the University of Sydney and subsequently the authors were unable to provide raw data for the analysis presented in the paper" Image
No further information, but we know from a previous request that the chat bot directed our mouse informant to this paper (which no longer exists).

The chat bot doesn't like the next question
Image
Image
So #ChatGPT confirms that a paper existed in 2018 published by #FastEddie Holmes and was retracted, yet no record exists of this paper anywhere.

Not pubmed, not google, not duckduckgo.

But a paper that did not exist prompted an investigation by @Sydney_Uni
It's clear from the title that this is a vitally important paper to the origins of the "Pandemic"...

"Spike cleavage fusion peptide motifs"

Just like the #EK1C4 paper from Zengli Shi, was this a peptide inhibitor developed in advance?

@CharlesRixey
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/artic…
Image
If this turns out to be true (which seems highly likely) then there are senior people at the University of Sydney who are covering up for Edward Holmes and are powerful enough to have that paper scrubbed off the internet.

Wow.
Cui Bono?

#Eddiegate
UPDATE: thank you to all the #mousearmy helpers showing us the fabricated references that the #ChatGPT makes up (but based on something)....

Which begs a deeper question.
Where is the ChatGPT getting information from, that is not available in the public domain?
I wonder how many of these studies were generating viruses under the cover of "discovered" viruses?

The supervising author of the Marmota paper (where the DOI redirects) is #FastEddie's co-author, while he was affiliated with CCP insitutes. Image
The more you dig into #FastEddie's papers the worse it looks.

Holmes appears to have identified more "new bat viruses" than anyone on earth. Apart from the CCP colleagues he has been "discovering" them with.

sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
Image
Holmes has produced over 100 papers just in the 3 year period 2017-2019. About 40 a year.

How?

Many of them are on "new virus discoveries" in collaboration with CCP-affiliated universities.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=holmes%2…
And I'd have to say, the last person I would want involved in tick-borne disease research is this guy.

Francisella and Rickettsia.

Potential vector for viruses and infectious viral-like clones.

Great.
Image
Image
"They wouldn't do that would they?"

This REPLICATING intracellular bacterium would be indistinguishable from "COVID" on a 2-gene PCR test.

Vaccine or virus?


@CharlesRixey @carl_jurassic @jjcouey nature.com/articles/s4154…
Image
Scratch that. 3 gene test.

This vector could produce the same symptoms and the same COVID PCR test result as "COVID"

Now... just need to get it into the population and massage the live reporting and

PANDEMIC!!!
[Note the codon optimisation is not declared in the paper] Image
So many "discovered" viruses all at the same time.

@Daoyu15 @Kevin_McKernan Image
Ahem
@Daoyu15 @Kevin_McKernan @CharlesRixey @joshg99 Image
What are the odds that a virus arising in at least 5 different species would all match the same sequence starting at the same point and matching a "newly discovered" human virus from 2001?

#ShutItDown


@Daoyu15 @WashburneAlex ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NC_039…
blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi?CMD=…

Image
Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jikkyleaks 🐭

Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Jikkyleaks

Feb 23
💥BOOM 💥
This post attracted hundreds of abusive pharma trolls, including an attempt to community note the post.

It was just a reply to another post and got over 1000 likes but 100s of trolls.

Why?

I am going to tell you in the next post. And it will shake your world.
You were lied to about the Merck measles vaccine develop in the 60s. When injected into babies it caused fevers, rashes, diarrhoea and febrile convulsions.

Why?

I'm going to show you.
@SecKennedy @RetsefL @MaryanneDemasi @DrJulieSladden @RWMaloneMD
Merck claimed that the "measles vaccine" was an "attenuated version of measles" giving the impression that it was a virus that was made safe.

That was a lie.

It was just measles, passaged in cells in a lab.

We injected our babies with actual measles.
How do I know?
Read 11 tweets
Feb 10
💥💥💥BOOM💥💥💥

Recently released Australian Road Deaths data confirm that the @epiphare study claiming that COVID vaccination reduced road deaths by 32% was, as suspected, a complete fake.

See next tweet for the analysis and sources.
Paper: jamanetwork.com/journals/jaman… x.com/sudokuvariante…https://www.bitre.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/road-trauma-australia-2024.pdf
Here are the actual road deaths data plotted from the Australian BITRE data repository using a trendline for 2000-2019 (excluding 2020 as it was a quiet year)

The pink area shows the inflection and increase in road deaths over the predicted number.

Note that road deaths have a downward trend despite an increase in population (due to safety measures and slowing of traffic).Image
So the question becomes...
"what is the probability that - if the @epiphare study was real (showing a 32% reduction in road deaths after vaccination) - the Australian road deaths (where nearly 100% of the adult population was vaccinated) would increase by 36%"?
Read 8 tweets
Jan 24
🚨🚨🚨
Do you know why you can't win a vaccine injury case in the US?

This one tweet from @DebbieN97142 opens the Pandora's box that is the Vaccine Injuries Compensation Scheme.

You never stood a chance.
Thread below.

@AaronSiriSG @MaryanneDemasi @RWMaloneMD
Debbie's tweet was about her case against @HHSGov when her son developed Type 1 Diabetes after a routine vaccine, when he had a negative glucose test prior.

So it was clearly vaccine linked, but her case was denied.

How did that happen?

From her post Image
Not only was the case denied (despite clear evidence of a new diagnosis immediately after vaccination) but the case was used by the "judge" to essentially ban ANY further cases that alleged a link between new diabetes and a routine vaccine.

Read it again. Image
Read 25 tweets
Dec 29, 2025
🚨 Important - Francis Boyle never submitted an affidavit to the Dutch court.

The document submitted by Sansone with Boyle's signature is not notarised, is not an affidavit and can only be considered a forgery.

See next tweet

Image
Here is the clip from the (decent) interview with Pelle Neroth Taylor of @RealTNTRadio.

In it Boyle is asked whether the mRNA vaccines are themselves biological weapons and he explains that because "in your system, it generates the COVID-19 cells" they would be.

But of course that's incorrect, because mRNA vaccines don't recreate the COVID virus (the biological weapon - assuming as we now know that it was synthetic not natural).
So his explanation was incorrect because he misunderstood that the mRNA only provides the spike protein and he would have been destroyed on this point in court.

Of course he never got to court. And never gave an affidavit for the Dutch court - confirmed here (8/3/25): Image
Read 9 tweets
Dec 26, 2025
Was it something I said @sensereceptor?

You're too amateur for this game dude, Sasha knows how to play it. You don't. She set you up.

Your threats are cliched. Find some new material. And stop sponging off your parents - you're 37 years old.

"Pharma thug" is not a real job Image
@SenseReceptor So now the Palleschi-Medici mafia has decided to threaten me using the Latypova network mob I'm very interested in why.

And why the matriarch can get a PhD without a single cited research paper.

Maybe missing something, so I'll keep digging.
Image
Image
@SenseReceptor Why is the Palleschi name interesting (other than being able to get a PhD from not very much research at all)?

Well they were famously the mafia-like family attached to the Medici clan.

The Medici's balls in fact
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palleschi
Read 17 tweets
Dec 16, 2025
I'll say it again. The vaccine industry [KNOWINGLY] hijacked cell pathways that cause cancer in order to induce antibody responses so that they can claim that their product "worked" by demonstrating those antibodies - even if they offered zero protection.

That is the scandal
To explain, when you induce an immune response you have an immune debt to pay. You can't just keep creating an immune response - or, as in the case of cancer, you will die.

A vaccine creates an artificial immune response...
Which might be fine if it was done every now and again. But what they didn't tell you was that the human body will not respond to an injected antigen alone. It will ignore it (thankfully) and the generic immune system will mop it up, no antibodies required.
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(