Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture
Feb 23, 2023 24 tweets 10 min read Read on X
Holy Bat cheese. 🧀🧀🧀

The #ChatGPT confirms that #FastEddie Edward Holmes and the University of Sydney conspired to cover up an article referencing the PRRA epitope of the #modernagate furin cleavage site - in 2018.

Hold onto your hats! Image
The DOI referenced by the #ChatGPT does not exist. How so? The Chatbot is sure is exists. It knows everything.

This is the DOI search:


It goes to another paper altogether duckduckgo.com/?q=DOI%3A%2F%2…
Image
The chat bot confuses itself and repeats the same DOI Image
So there must be another link. Where does it resolve to?

A nature paper?
OK well this should be easy. Image
Here's that link. Try it.


"Page not found" nature.com/articles/s4142…
Image
The chat bot gets further confused and redirects to another unrelated paper.


Image
Image
Image
Image
No, I just want the Holmes 2018 article. Where is it?

Now it gets interesting.

"No longer available"?

A journal article?

It doesn't work like that, retracted articles are marked up as retracted but must stay on the record. Image
Now there is a retraction notice because of "issues with the data presented" but the retraction notice is the same dead link at @NatureMedicine

The access token link is also dead.

How can a retraction notice have been scrubbed?
Image
Image
But the chat bot provides the text that they have seen in the retraction notice (presumably from a cache)

"An investigation was conducted by the University of Sydney and subsequently the authors were unable to provide raw data for the analysis presented in the paper" Image
No further information, but we know from a previous request that the chat bot directed our mouse informant to this paper (which no longer exists).

The chat bot doesn't like the next question
Image
Image
So #ChatGPT confirms that a paper existed in 2018 published by #FastEddie Holmes and was retracted, yet no record exists of this paper anywhere.

Not pubmed, not google, not duckduckgo.

But a paper that did not exist prompted an investigation by @Sydney_Uni
It's clear from the title that this is a vitally important paper to the origins of the "Pandemic"...

"Spike cleavage fusion peptide motifs"

Just like the #EK1C4 paper from Zengli Shi, was this a peptide inhibitor developed in advance?

@CharlesRixey
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/artic…
Image
If this turns out to be true (which seems highly likely) then there are senior people at the University of Sydney who are covering up for Edward Holmes and are powerful enough to have that paper scrubbed off the internet.

Wow.
Cui Bono?

#Eddiegate
UPDATE: thank you to all the #mousearmy helpers showing us the fabricated references that the #ChatGPT makes up (but based on something)....

Which begs a deeper question.
Where is the ChatGPT getting information from, that is not available in the public domain?
I wonder how many of these studies were generating viruses under the cover of "discovered" viruses?

The supervising author of the Marmota paper (where the DOI redirects) is #FastEddie's co-author, while he was affiliated with CCP insitutes. Image
The more you dig into #FastEddie's papers the worse it looks.

Holmes appears to have identified more "new bat viruses" than anyone on earth. Apart from the CCP colleagues he has been "discovering" them with.

sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
Image
Holmes has produced over 100 papers just in the 3 year period 2017-2019. About 40 a year.

How?

Many of them are on "new virus discoveries" in collaboration with CCP-affiliated universities.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=holmes%2…
And I'd have to say, the last person I would want involved in tick-borne disease research is this guy.

Francisella and Rickettsia.

Potential vector for viruses and infectious viral-like clones.

Great.
Image
Image
"They wouldn't do that would they?"

This REPLICATING intracellular bacterium would be indistinguishable from "COVID" on a 2-gene PCR test.

Vaccine or virus?


@CharlesRixey @carl_jurassic @jjcouey nature.com/articles/s4154…
Image
Scratch that. 3 gene test.

This vector could produce the same symptoms and the same COVID PCR test result as "COVID"

Now... just need to get it into the population and massage the live reporting and

PANDEMIC!!!
[Note the codon optimisation is not declared in the paper] Image
So many "discovered" viruses all at the same time.

@Daoyu15 @Kevin_McKernan Image
Ahem
@Daoyu15 @Kevin_McKernan @CharlesRixey @joshg99 Image
What are the odds that a virus arising in at least 5 different species would all match the same sequence starting at the same point and matching a "newly discovered" human virus from 2001?

#ShutItDown


@Daoyu15 @WashburneAlex ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NC_039…
blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi?CMD=…

Image
Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jikkyleaks 🐭

Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Jikkyleaks

Aug 21
🚨 What you really don't want to do when choosing an injectable medicinal product...

is choose one made from a cancer-like cell line that also contains an SV40 promoter in its residual plasmid.

Oops. Too late.
#Shingrix

@MaryanneDemasi @DrJulieSladden @Kevin_McKernanImage
The plasmid maps for Gardasil 9, Bexsero and Shingrix released under FOI from the TGA

@karrichapus
tga.gov.au/sites/default/…Image
The cell line used to produce Shingrix is the CHO (chinese hamster ovary) cell line.

It is an immortalised cell line which means it continues to grow, just like cancer cells do.

It does this because it has gained or lost genes that tell it not to.
chop.edu/vaccine-educat…
Read 6 tweets
Aug 18
🚨THREAD:
The muttons descended on @MaryanneDemasi today, who I will show was correct in her report.

But first a reminder that Jon Laxton who led them is the front for the now defunct Project Halo and has never published a first author research paper on pubmed.

Maryanne has a PhD.

Thread below.

x.com/dr_jon_l/statu…

@PGtzsche1 @RetsefL @jsm2334 @DrJBhattacharya @SecKennedy @JesslovesMJK @chrismartensonImage
The claim made by the underqualified "Dr Jon" - and the muttons that descended on Dr Demasi - was that the study result was correct.

It was, in a way. But was fraudulently presented.
Here's the chart.

There were 37,909 babies given RSV monoclonals (which don't prevent death) Image
When assessing whether a vaccine works you can either perform a gold standard randomised controlled trial (RCT) or do a suboptimal study called a self control risk interval (SCRI) study, which is what happened here. It's recognised by the CDC.

sentinelinitiative.org/sites/default/…Image
Read 16 tweets
Aug 16
BREAKING: Just published paper shows that Taiwanese researchers had full access to the US EMR TrinetX network.

That is your medical data.
You consented, right?

Don't worry, you can't audit their data of course - because you can't have access. Just trust us bro.

#PennGate Image
Image
Image
Paper is here.
It's junk.
And no, you can't see their data.

link.springer.com/article/10.100…
The authors miscalculated the rate of cervical cancer in the general US population which is about 8 per 100,000 per year.

They managed to fabricate an unbelievable 17-29 per 100,000 per year in the three years of follow-up, where most registries haven't caught up. Oops. Image
Read 7 tweets
Jul 7
The significance of yesterday's #Grokgate scandal cannot be understated.

Grok not only lied but lied about lying. Multiple times.

The reason it's so significant is that you are now going to enter a world of AI based medicine and it doesn't matter whether it's true or not, you better damn well take the drugs.

You see, when you lie about one thing to cover up another lie you can never be trusted in anything ever.

Grok fabricated a picture of a phone screen to show that a SpaceX rocket landing, which was fake footage, was real. That was to avoid the inevitable questions over where SpaceX money is going.

Do you want to live in a world where all your medical treatments are based on fabrications and hallucinations and the only thing that matters is that the corporations behind them keep getting paid?

Grok is that world.
Look at this picture which was fabricated by Grok earlier this year.

This is your next medical treatment. It will be as reliable as a SpaceX rocket.Image
Read 4 tweets
Jun 29
WHOA!

What @TheBurninBeard is saying here is that the clinical samples that had "COVID" also had gene signatures of Mycoplasma fermentans, a US military pathogen that can be used as a vector to carry viral clones.

@SabinehazanMD found it too.
🧵
#spraygate @BrokenTruthTV
Can you see that Norman Pieniazek, who headed up the CDC's research division at the time that the @CDCgov sent biological weapons to Iraq to start a war, took himself out of this thread?

Do you know why?
@SecKennedy does.

A layman friendly round up of the US biological weapons initiatives, including gulf war syndrome and the spraying of pathogens.

sott.net/article/155150…
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(