Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture
Feb 23, 2023 β€’ 24 tweets β€’ 10 min read β€’ Read on X
Holy Bat cheese. πŸ§€πŸ§€πŸ§€

The #ChatGPT confirms that #FastEddie Edward Holmes and the University of Sydney conspired to cover up an article referencing the PRRA epitope of the #modernagate furin cleavage site - in 2018.

Hold onto your hats! Image
The DOI referenced by the #ChatGPT does not exist. How so? The Chatbot is sure is exists. It knows everything.

This is the DOI search:

It goes to another paper altogether duckduckgo.com/?q=DOI%3A%2F%2…
The chat bot confuses itself and repeats the same DOI Image
So there must be another link. Where does it resolve to?

A nature paper?
OK well this should be easy. Image
Here's that link. Try it.

"Page not found" nature.com/articles/s4142…
The chat bot gets further confused and redirects to another unrelated paper.

No, I just want the Holmes 2018 article. Where is it?

Now it gets interesting.

"No longer available"?

A journal article?

It doesn't work like that, retracted articles are marked up as retracted but must stay on the record. Image
Now there is a retraction notice because of "issues with the data presented" but the retraction notice is the same dead link at @NatureMedicine

The access token link is also dead.

How can a retraction notice have been scrubbed?
But the chat bot provides the text that they have seen in the retraction notice (presumably from a cache)

"An investigation was conducted by the University of Sydney and subsequently the authors were unable to provide raw data for the analysis presented in the paper" Image
No further information, but we know from a previous request that the chat bot directed our mouse informant to this paper (which no longer exists).

The chat bot doesn't like the next question
So #ChatGPT confirms that a paper existed in 2018 published by #FastEddie Holmes and was retracted, yet no record exists of this paper anywhere.

Not pubmed, not google, not duckduckgo.

But a paper that did not exist prompted an investigation by @Sydney_Uni
It's clear from the title that this is a vitally important paper to the origins of the "Pandemic"...

"Spike cleavage fusion peptide motifs"

Just like the #EK1C4 paper from Zengli Shi, was this a peptide inhibitor developed in advance?

If this turns out to be true (which seems highly likely) then there are senior people at the University of Sydney who are covering up for Edward Holmes and are powerful enough to have that paper scrubbed off the internet.

Cui Bono?

UPDATE: thank you to all the #mousearmy helpers showing us the fabricated references that the #ChatGPT makes up (but based on something)....

Which begs a deeper question.
Where is the ChatGPT getting information from, that is not available in the public domain?
I wonder how many of these studies were generating viruses under the cover of "discovered" viruses?

The supervising author of the Marmota paper (where the DOI redirects) is #FastEddie's co-author, while he was affiliated with CCP insitutes. Image
The more you dig into #FastEddie's papers the worse it looks.

Holmes appears to have identified more "new bat viruses" than anyone on earth. Apart from the CCP colleagues he has been "discovering" them with.

Holmes has produced over 100 papers just in the 3 year period 2017-2019. About 40 a year.


Many of them are on "new virus discoveries" in collaboration with CCP-affiliated universities.

And I'd have to say, the last person I would want involved in tick-borne disease research is this guy.

Francisella and Rickettsia.

Potential vector for viruses and infectious viral-like clones.

"They wouldn't do that would they?"

This REPLICATING intracellular bacterium would be indistinguishable from "COVID" on a 2-gene PCR test.

Vaccine or virus?

@CharlesRixey @carl_jurassic @jjcouey nature.com/articles/s4154…
Scratch that. 3 gene test.

This vector could produce the same symptoms and the same COVID PCR test result as "COVID"

Now... just need to get it into the population and massage the live reporting and

[Note the codon optimisation is not declared in the paper] Image
So many "discovered" viruses all at the same time.

@Daoyu15 @Kevin_McKernan Image
@Daoyu15 @Kevin_McKernan @CharlesRixey @joshg99 Image
What are the odds that a virus arising in at least 5 different species would all match the same sequence starting at the same point and matching a "newly discovered" human virus from 2001?


@Daoyu15 @WashburneAlex ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NC_039…


β€’ β€’ β€’

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Jikkyleaks 🐭

Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Jikkyleaks

Jan 25
@JaninePaynter @PetousisH Following 4 years of enforced medical interventions does the public trust or distrust public health?
@JaninePaynter @PetousisH Always worth recording after the early polling and before the pharma companies send in their accounts.

It's like Georgia. Someone flood the polling station quick! Image
@JaninePaynter @PetousisH And here we have it.
The poll started off in one direction, and as soon as the pharma brigade got hold of it, it went the opposite way.

The problem is that they now have 19 hours to keep the bots going.

@elonmusk please make poll voting a 2-step interaction. TY.
Read 9 tweets
Oct 28, 2023
BOOM πŸ’₯πŸ’₯
It's a gene therapy.
It was a gene therapy yesterday.
It will still be a gene therapy tomorrow.
With a plasmid, it's two gene therapies.

The OGTR confirms:
"Under the gene technology act an [OGTR] approval would have been required"

@SenatorRennick @double_christ
@SenatorRennick @Double_Christ This was a lie from Dr Raj Bhula.
It's transfection.
It's in the Pfizer documents that the TGA have.
Everybody knows it's transfection.
If Dr Bhula doesn't know, she should resign immediately.
The OGTR failed.
From the document that @SenatorRennick is referring to.

They never knew what they were doing. They just needed to make you take it.
Who told them to do that?
And why was it necessary for you to have 3 transfections in order to earn a living?

Read 9 tweets
Oct 25, 2023
Hi @peterdaszak now that I have your attention why did Alice Latinne hide those viral sequences from your 2019 Nature paper, and where did the GP-120 sequences come from?

Asking for 6.9m people who can't, because they died.

Read 7 tweets
Oct 23, 2023
Well, it used to be rare.

This is the same rare lymphoma that Michel Goldman wrote about developing after a COVID mRNA "vaccine".

(see next tweet).

Michel Goldman's story in the Atlantic
Original paper - which was Michel Goldman's own story, published in Frontiers.
Read 7 tweets
Oct 22, 2023
Were the claims made in this press conference by a high profile CNN doctor true?

Watch the conference clip and follow the thread below.
It is impossible to know what is happening in another part of the world unless you are there.

But the statements made by Gassan Abu-Sittah cannot be true as made.

If not true they could even qualify as an incitement to further violence. Image
The claims made by Dr Abu-Sittah are not accidental or misinterpreted.

He specifically claimed that 500 people were killed - days after the press conference when it was known that was not true.

Read 15 tweets
Oct 18, 2023
The author of the BMJ article quoted by Viki as if it is gospel is a freelance journalist. He chose not to include that qualifier in this BMJ piece.

This tweet from Viki is propaganda because it suggests something that is not true, adding the @bmj_latest label for authenticity
@bmj_latest Here is the request for the data underlying the MBRRACE report.

Data from the @NPEU_UKOSS has previously been requested under FOI and denied.

This is not their data, it belongs to the British public who fund them.

@bmj_latest @NPEU_UKOSS The BMJ article itself is just an opinion piece from a freelance journalist, basically repeating the party line - that only unvaccinated pregnant women died of COVID.

This is a misrepresentation of the truth.
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!


0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy


3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!