'The Scots descend from the Scoti/Sgaothaich - a Scythian nation with links to Egypt via Scota/Scoti, daughter of Pharaoh Cingris/Cincris of the Scythian Hyskos dynasty who migrated to Ireland (and then moved into Britain) in the mid-late first millennium BC.'
2/ It is said that the Egyptian pharaohs never, and I repeat never, married their daughters to other princes or kings.
The 'Ologists say… "..number one big no no back in the day …"
This excerpt is from Amenhotep III, father of Akhenaten, when a Babylonian king demanded he provide him with an Egyptian princess in a letter from around 1370 BCE👇
3/ There is no evidence from the 'Ologists' or any other historical texts from the entire pharaonic period, telling us that an Egyptian princess was married to a foreigner, king, prince, or commoner.
Only in the 'Myths'
They say that the immediate family of the pharaoh was kept close, perhaps because of issues of claims to the throne, either way ".they just didn’t do it.."
🫤
2/ Saga is an Old Norse word meaning “a thing that is said” , it s seems similar to the ancient Greek word 'muthon' [“things that are said”] this is also where we get our word 'myth' from.
[so moar usurpation from the Greeks, see: MEDusa, MEDicine, greek-fire etc]
This 'Saga' was first told almost, [wait for it] 1000 years after the Germanic Burgundians, by an Icelandic scribe.
3/ ..Of course 'Burgundians' were supposedly first noted in 98ad by Tacitus [see: proven fake, rome Tall-Tales]
and treated in his reciting's as '..relatively minor people..'
1/ Never mind the Chronology
Here is a so-called 'Sumerian/[Arcadian imo] Cart' [pic 1-2] [think war-machine [pic4]
I am not convinced with the official 'Sumerians' back-story OR its chronology OR the narrative.
You shouldn't be either
..not convinced At All and it is not even close.
It just take a little Holistic thinking and some pattern-recognition.
Sharing gods and kings through the timeline is one-of-many 'red-flags' and sharing 'carts' is another [pic-3] [just like the hut-dwelling-romans shared 'Ships-style' with the 'Vikings'🙃
..OR who the Sumerians really were. 😉
So here is some Donkeys and cows pulling the first 'Cart' in so-called 'Sumeria'..
..annnnd some [late-Scythian/Proto-Tartarian] Wheeled-Carts from "2000" years later.
The chronology is absurd these were the same peoples'
2/ Pic-1 is a 'late-Scythian/proto-Tartarian] warrior with the same Phrygian hat [symbol of 'Peoples Revolution']
Pic-2 is also 'late-Scythian/proto-Tartarian
Pic-3 is both
Pic-4 is a knife comparison
[officially] separated by 2000+- years
#Tartaria
3/ The Artwork, the culture, the religion, of the so-called 'Sumerian' burial 'tombs' are the same as that OF the Proto-Tartarians [late-Scythians, read: Meads/Matani/Aryans/Acadians etc] [pic-1]
The same 'metal-working' as well.
Tartaria mastered Iron 900 years earlier pic-2
👇
1/ This thread will show the sauce for #AmericanTartaria
Yes, America was called American Tartaria, waaaay before it was ever called America.
These 'chiefs' were Tartarian kings upto 1755. And American Tartary is referred to as "Indian wars"
Conte di Ottomano map i497-i539👇
2/ Partial Translation:
"..From among these people and among other emperors came a very powerful man who brought into his empire all of Greece, Turkey, both Armenias, Mesopotamia, the Chaldeans, Syria, Medea, Persia, and part of India, and he was called Tamerlane the Great."
3/ American Tartaria = "Indian wars"
[read carefully]
🧐
👇
1/ So, A Wall that surrounds the earth?
In our ancient past?
Curious anomaly here
Credit to @Mathias56936375for the tip
hidden_nations~ IG
🧐
2/ This mysterious wall surrounds tens of thousands of miles across beneath the ocean.
This wall’s sheer size and its adherence to symmetry indicate it is not a natural formation to many. In fact, many people are convinced that due to the numerous discoveries made across the globe which completely contradict history as we have been taught in school, something like this is entirely possible.
After all, these Usurpers say Earth is millions of years old and we are beginning to uncover evidence that suggests many ancient civilizations inhabited Earth in our planet’s long history.
3/ What are we looking at there? A Supermassive wall as the above video claims?
Or just another glitch in the image processing techniques in Google maps?
For the record, It was the Tartarians who built Kremlin [read: Russia].
The 'Kremle' is derived from the Tartarian word 'krim', or 'krem', which signifies 'a fortress'.
'..From whatever country they came, the taste displayed in the edifice is evidently Tartarian...'
."..The more we inquire into the real history of Russia, and of Russian sovereigns, the more we shall have reason to believe, that the country, and its people, have undergone little variation since the foundation of the empire.
Peter the Great might cut of the beards o f the nobles, and substitute European habits for Asiatic robes, but the inward man is still the same.
A Russian of the nineteenth century possesses all the servile propensities, the barbarity of manners, the cruelty, hypocrisy, and profligacy, which characterized his ancestors in the ninth ..' [snip]
~
Again, you will see that John Basilovich [read: one of the supposed 'founders' of Russia] POPPED into his position post-cataclysm just as Bonaparte was...
"..John Basilovich I, has been considered as one of the founders o f the Russian empire; but his accession did not take place till the middle of the fifteenth century.
He arose, like Bonaparte, in a period of national dismay, confusion, and calamity and though described as a man of impetuous vices and violent passions, intrepid, artful, treacherous, and having all the ferocity of a savage, has been hailed as the deliverer of his country, and dignified by the appellation of 'The Great', It is a title which an oppressed intimidated people have frequently bestowed upon tyrants.
Until his time, however, Tartars were lords of Moscow— the tsars them selves being obliged to stand in the presence of their ambassadors.
[snip]
'..Basilovich shook off the Tartar yoke but it was a long time before the Russians, always children of imitation, ceased to mimic a people by whom they had been conquered.
They had neither arts nor opinions of their own:
Everything in Moscow was Tartarian
— dress, manners, buildings, equipages ln short, all except religion and language
cont..
'..But the most remarkable edifice, as it affords a striking monument of national manners, is the Church of St Basil , near the Kremlin. It is a complete specimen of the Tartarian taste in building..'
[snip]
'..From whatever country they [architects] came, the taste displayed in the edifice is evidently Tartarian..'
👇
Bares repeating...
Even in this book, it is recognized that even AFTER '1000' years, the Russians [read: The entire realm at this time] behaved the same as they did '1000 years earlier'.
This is the same across the world, post-cataclysm.
..almost like those '1000 years' were inserted...👇
Russian of the nineteenth century possesses all the servile propensities, the barbarity of manners, the cruelty, hypocrisy, and profligacy, which characterized his ancestors in the ninth ..' [snip]
Same with 'Rome'
Same with 'Europe'
Same with 'Arabs'
ad Infinitum
Everyone starts off where they 'left-off'
Same glass, same ancient language, same math's, same architecture, same sciences et al.
😉