Women's Rights Network - WRN Profile picture
Feb 24, 2023 14 tweets 7 min read Read on X
🧵 On discrimination against people with Dementia from the gender ideology language demands placed on them

👉🏻womensrights.network/section3-adults

#NoToYourPronouns
▪️ 944,000 adults have dementia in the UK

🗣 Their communication disability needs are being ignored.

👵Women are greatly affected.

#NoToYourPronouns
🔹60-70% of carers for people with dementia are women
🔹Women are 2.3 times more likely to provide care for someone with dementia for over 5 years
🔹20% of female carers have gone from FT to PT employment as a result of their caring responsibilities
🔹17% felt penalised at work
The ability to process pronouns, indeed any language elements, is diminished in all dementia types:

▪️Alzheimer’s disease
▪️Vascular dementia
▪️Mixed dementia
▪️Dementia with Lewy Bodies
▪️Frontotemporal dementia
▪️Young-onset dementia

#NoToYourPronouns
cont/...
▪️Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD)
▪️Alcohol-related dementia
▪️HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder (HAND)
▪️Mild cognitive impairment (MCI)
▪️Learning disabilities and dementia
▪️Rare dementias

#NoToYourPronouns
Language difficulties are recognised as a major problem for people with dementia (Banovic, Zunic, Sinanovic, 2018)

#NoToYourPronouns
There are many symptoms and language processing is highly inter-related.

#NoToYourPronouns
It is well recognised that people with Alzheimer’s disease dementia experience:

🔺Impaired understanding of pronouns
🔺Abnormal over-use of pronouns
🔺Working memory impairment
(Almor et al., 1999)

#NoToYourPronouns
And it is best that conversation partners avoid pronouns in favour of “concrete, specific and simple words” (Rau, 1993)

#NoToYourPronouns
People with dementia have legal rights:
▪️ UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD)
▪️ Equality Act 2010-Disability
▪️ Public Sector Equality Duty (PSED) under EqA
▪️ The Care Act 2014
▪️The Mental Capacity Act 2005
& can expect
▪️ Reasonable adjustments
The NHS must meet the CQC regulatory requirements of the Accessible Information Standard (AIS)

#NoToYourPronouns
🔹People with communication disabilities have rights.

🔹People with disabilities have rights.

🔹We must do everything within our power to uphold those rights.

👉🏻 For more info: womensrights.network/disability-dis…

#NoToYourPronouns

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Women's Rights Network - WRN

Women's Rights Network - WRN Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @WomensRightsNet

Sep 25
WRN fully support this campaign. We've known for a long time that upskirting, voyeurism & indecent exposure are indicative of a pattern of criminal behaviour that leads to more serious crimes. The Pelicot case in France is just one horrifying example. 🧵/1
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1…
However it is hard to reconcile this with current police policy that tells female officers that any man who identifies as a woman, non-binary or gender fluid can use their facilities. If he exposes himself on the streets it's a crime but in a changing room it's all fine. It is also incorrect as the Eq Act does allow you to refuse males in female facilities. 🧵/2Image
These nurses in Darlington fell foul of the same issue. The male nurse wasn't arrested for indecent exposure, instead his female colleagues were told they would be 're-educated.' Indecent exposure in public is frightening, when you are more vulnerable because in a state of undress, it is even more so. 🧵/3
news.sky.com/story/nurses-s…
Read 11 tweets
Sep 16
After a long campaign against the so-called ‘Gender Quotas Bill’ in Wales, we are delighted that @WelshGovernment have finally now decided to scrap it.

This Bill was always an unlawful attempt to lever in self ID in Wales, a direct threat to the rights of women and girls, and would have inevitably ended up in the Supreme Court.

1/

bbc.co.uk/news/articles/…
WRN and @WRNWales have been at the forefront of the campaign against the Bill.
An early version was leaked, exposing the intent to allow men to self ID without challenge.
And WRN gave evidence at the Senedd this year, after submitting our consultation response.
We are pleased the new @PrifWeinidog has listened - her predecessors have not.
2/
Our thanks to all the women who stood up for their rights, wrote letters, and who attended the Senedd hearing.

We hope that @WelshGovernment now listen to these tenacious women and engage fully with them in future.

3/3
Image
Image
Read 4 tweets
Sep 10
The @HMICFRS report into activism and impartiality in policing is out.

Its key findings are that the police are CONFUSED about the law and are NOT impartial because they DON'T UNDERSTAND what operational independence looks like.

1/8

hmicfrs.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/publication-ht…
This flies in the face of the Government's assertion that they do not intend clarifying the Equality Act.

The HMICFRS report clearly states that clarification is needed. The Police recognise this. Why doesn’t the Government? @AnnelieseDodds
2/8
telegraph.co.uk/politics/2024/…
Image
This confusion (along with a hefty dollop of indoctrination) has led the NPCC to approve the transgender search guidance that allows males to strip search women and girls.

This guidance is unlawful and is a clear example of the police going beyond the law.

3/8
womensrights.network/wrn-police-rep…
Read 9 tweets
Sep 9
We WANT to believe that the @metpoliceuk are listening to women.
We WANT to believe that they are serious about policing impartially.
But reality tells a different story.
We would like to update you now about the below response we received about extreme trans activism within the Metropolitan Police.
1/7Image
Image
Image
Rewind to 21 July last year, when we released this short clip to illustrate our concerns about a ‘Trans Day of Visibility’ event that had been held by a member of Metropolitan police staff.

Officers and staff had been invited to attend.
We know there were at least 50 in the room and many more listening remotely. Speaking during this session were various activists. The messages given to officers and staff were disturbing.
2/7
)Image
We wrote to Sir Mark Rowley, the Metropolitan Police Commissioner.
Serving officers and staff should NOT be told that they are ‘bigots’ and ‘motivated by hate’ if they do not agree with trans ideology.
Officers should NOT be told to protest, lobby and to ‘get out onto the streets’.
It is staggering that the report by Baroness Casey was being disparaged.
It is shocking that officers and staff would think it appropriate or professional to boo and hiss at the mention of a prominent women’s rights campaigner.
Yet all this happened on their premises. And they see nothing wrong with that.

3/7Image
Image
Image
Read 8 tweets
Aug 30
How did @scotwomensaid end up in the sorry mess of advertising a key domestic abuse role for ‘women only’ but included men in that description?

The answer lies in their many years of shocking ideological capture and a total betrayal of the vulnerable women and families they serve.

A thread 🧵
1/6

telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/08/2…
This document ‘Stronger Together:
Guidance for women’s services on the inclusion of transgender women’ is available on the @scotwomensaid website.

Notably it states “Staff at LGBT Youth Scotland offered invaluable advice, including support with the drafting of the guidance and with the training package following the guidance”.

2/6

womensaid.scot/wp-content/upl…Image
Image
For many years now, they have seen no issue at all with a man working in their services.

It’s therefore no surprise that they’ve included men in their ‘women only’ job advertisement.

3/6 Image
Read 6 tweets
Aug 29
Do women - their core customer base - actually even matter to @JohnLewisRetail?
Clearly not.

This powerful and heart breaking resignation letter from a former employee lays bare JL’s dismissive and abusive attitude to women in searing detail, and their lack of concern for the safety or comfort of female staff.

Along with many other women’s organisations, WRN have campaigned against the scandalous policy of companies like @JohnLewisRetail to allow men into changing rooms and toilets, whether staff or public ones.

We have written to them.
We have leafletted them.
We have carried out ‘mystery shopper’ exercises.
We have spoken to staff.
JL has not listened.

Not only do they neglect their employer safeguarding duties, they actively celebrate the fetishes of their male employees.

No wonder female staff feel so unsafe and so disregarded.

We stand with Lesley.
1/5
We’ve written to @JohnLewisRetail with our concerns.
2/5
They wrote back - we weren’t convinced (to say the least).
3/5
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(