The problem with Phillips curve explanations for inflation surge, such as the paper presented at @ChicagoBooth IGM' #USMPF2023, is they largely ignore supply. @BostonFed prez Susan Collins presents a counterpoint here, noting key contribution of supply. bostonfed.org/news-and-event…
"Unanticipated supply shortfalls...lowered capacity relative to pre-pandemic trends ... it is difficult to
assess extent, duration of supply challenges in real time – esp. if they depend on pandemic dev'ts, unexpected shocks such as Russia’s war in Ukraine." - Susan Collins
3/ "Despite large drop in services consumption,
there was little decline in services price inflation .. (in) contrast with the... Great Recession... [which] again suggests a key role for supply constraints this time." Boston Fed prez Susan Collins.
4/ "Expectatation was as economy reopened.. Supply – most notably labor supply, since services tend to be labor intensive – would increase to meet demand. [in fact]...the expected pickup in labor supply ...has been taking much longer... than expected." Susan Collins to #USMPF2023
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
My takeway from India trip: the familiar story of great potential held back by lousy infrastructure, burdensome regulation and inward orientation needs to be retired. Recent economic performance and reforms position it as true economic heavyweight wsj.com/articles/as-in…
2/ India will be fastest growing of 30 major economies in 2023-24, IMF says. Last year became 5th largest economy by $ GDP (passing UK), could be 4th by 2025.
3/ Supply side reform necessary to sustain that growth, and Modi is delivering: more roads, highways, airports, dedicated freight rail corridors, vast expansion of toilets, water and electricity to rural households
1/ To me, whether crypto has *some* worth is the wrong question. It has facilitated some useful transactions and made possible some legit businesses. The question is whether those positives outweigh its negatives. For most durable innovations like the telephone, Internet...
2/ the positives clearly outweigh the negatives. For a handful, it’s the opposite: asbestos, fentanyl come to mind. So far, ransomware, money laundering, fraud and other negative use cases seem to collectively outweigh the positive use cases for crypto. wsj.com/articles/crypt…
3/ Crypto was first promoted as an alternative to fiat currency & established banking. There, it has failed. Now, it seems to be pushed as an alternative to equities. This isn’t necessarily bad; innovative financial products can make possible new business models...
The crypto meltdown did us a favor. Crypto became a $3 trillion asset class with bank-like intermediaries but few connections to actual banking. So its implosion has had no spillovers. My column explores: wsj.com/articles/how-c…
2/ Like banking, crypto is highly leveraged and interconnected; fire sales, contagion, caused one failure to ripple through to others. Crypto companies listed "customers" and other crypto companies as major creditors; no banks, as far as we can tell.
3/ This diagram from the federal Financial Stability Oversight Council nicely illustrates the web of connections with bankrupt hedge fund Three Arrows Capital at center home.treasury.gov/system/files/2…
All politics are local, but incumbents this year are being cashiered by a global problem: inflation. Republicans tied inflation to Biden's $1.9T stimulus, but Biden isn't why core inflation is just as high in Canada, UK, Sweden, Australia. My latest: wsj.com/articles/midte…
2/ Biden isn't why Australia's center right government got turfed out in May over cost of living concerns, or why French, Italian and Swedish governing parties/coalitions all lost seats, or power, also over energy/inflation.
3/ True, US stimulus did spill over to others' inflation via traded good prices; strong dollar also played a part. But that can only explain a small part of their inflation, and it can't explain service prices, or why labor markets are tight everywhere.
From @RBAInfo's monetary policy statement: "Inflation is ... very high and broadly based ... After initially being predominantly driven by supply shocks, inflation is now spreading to more persistent non-discretionary items..."
"Measures of underlying inflation are also high, with trimmed mean inflation at 6.1 per cent ...Prices for newly built dwellings continue to rise rapidly, with the annual rate above 20 per cent."
Milton Friedman said inflation was always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon. No, said Thomas Sargent: it's always and everywhere a fiscal phenomenon. With deficits and inflation both too high, the fiscal theory of the price level is making a comeback. wsj.com/articles/to-so…
2/ FTPL bears a more than passing resemblance to MMT, in that both treat fiscal and monetary policy as indivisible. But whereas MMT says that justifies unlimited deficit spending until inflation erupts, FTPL says unlimited deficit spending guarantees inflation will erupt.
3/ Indeed, to those who regard surprise inflation as economically equivalent to default (either way, creditors suffer a real loss of wealth), FTPL refutes the central policy recommendation of MMT: monetary sovereignty does not, in the end, create unlimited fiscal space.