The main take from tonight's vlogg discussion was that Ukraine has managed the war better during 2023 than was expected. There where also doubts that Russia was able to a large offensive encompassing the whole area east of the Dniepr.
Most thought that an offensive west of Kharkiv to threaten ukrainian forces east of the Oskil river and in Slavyansk was the most likely major alternative for a large offensive. I concur with that assessment and has written about it several times already.
I believe that a number of medium-sized offensives are the most likely russian course of action. There could also be combined with continuous intensified attrition and diversionary attacks in the Sumy and Chernihiv regions.
The main goal would be to prevent an ukrainian counteroffensive, inflict large ukrainian losses and the complete taking of Donetsk oblast.
The last in turn would lead to unrolling of the well fortified ukrainian defence lines, ending of the ukrainian semi siege of Donetsk City and a wider land corridor to Crimea.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/The supplysituation for Bakhmut is hard but not critical. Even though several roads are cut there isn't just one way left into Bakhmut. We talk a lot of the 0504-road from Chasiv Yar/Vulytsya to Bakhmut via Khromove. But you can probably get supplies to Ivanivske from road 0504
There's a dirt road from Ivanivske to road 0504. Actually the last 40 meters is lacking (yellow arrow) but combat engineers could fix that in a couple of hours. So if you take control of Khromove the ukrainan forces could still get supplies through Ivanivske.
There are also two different roads from Ivanivske to Bakhmut. There are also a road from Kalinin via Bohdanivka to road 0504. To really stop supplies to fet to Bakhmut russian forces need to take control of both Khromove and Ivanivske.
According to my sources Russia produces 10 000 artillery shells a day, up from 5000 a year ago. In obe yearsctime the goal iscto produce 20 000 shells a day. Now they use 20 000 a day, down from 40-60 000a day last summer. They use 10 000 shells from their reserves every day.
At the beginning of the war Russia had up to 15 000 000 millions shells in storage. Most of thise must now be used up. Soon Russia must reduce it's shell consumption to 10 000 a day to match production.
The alternatives are to start using the 100 million plus old soviet shells in storage, but they don't function so well. An other alternative is getting ammo from DPRK (North Korea) who also has large reserves. 5 million shells from DPRK would give 15 000 shells a day for a year.
Many who tries to look on the war as neutralt as possible are all the time accused of being vatniks and russian trolls. @DefensePolitics wrote about it recently. In Sweden the ultimate warmonger is the best-selling author of technothrillers Lars Wilderäng.
He blocks everybody that doubt the inflated ukrainian claims of killed russian soldiers, but even supporters of Ukraine are blocked if they want to keep swedish weapons in Sweden to defend our country and don't send them to Ukraine.
He and his ilk are good defenders of free speech and an open liberal debate. But I would have realised this earlier. When I read his books I didn't like that swedish soldiers and weapons always where 10 times better than the Russians.
As the war goes on we talk about other things in Sweden. One leading police chief, Nats Löfving, took his life today. He got all the blame for a scandal where one of his deputies, Linda Staaf, in the national police intelligence department where his mistress.
He is dead, his mistress went and became mistress to the commander in chief of Sweden. He has now divorced his wife. For me it's very simple. A woman who becomes mistress to several leading and married men in the police and military are a security risk. The same goes for the men.
This is a joke, but I've seen this in real life. No one is immune to diversity thoughts. Even in the Sweden Democrat party, supposedly conservative and nationalistic, a member of an election committee I chaired, suggested that we should select a candidate for the elections that
soften the picture of the party. He had a candidate that would be perfect. She was immigrant from southeast Asia, woman and disabled. Then I said, she can't speak swedish. Even better he said. No, no, no was my answer.