A large incel forum survey found that 71.5% of the respondents reported being on the autism spectrum: nationalpost.com/news/inside-th…
Another survey found that 18% had an official diagnosis, while a whopping 74% were self-diagnosed. Regardless of the level of accuracy to these self-diagnoses, it shows at the least that autism-like social difficulties are unsurprisingly highly prevalent in this community.
This massive overrepresentation also carries over 'incel-related' mass killers turning out to have been diagnosed with an autism spectrum disorder.
Beginning with the infamous Elliot Rodger, who was diagnosed with PDD-NOS (another defunct subtype of autism) in 2007.
The anonymous hacker known as 4chan also revealed that he asked Yahoo Answers whether he was allowed to buy a gun in California while having receiving benefits for 'mild autism and anxiety'.
Next up Alek Minassian, who spergily proclaimed: "The Incel Rebellion has already begun! We will overthrow all the Chads and Stacys! All hail the Supreme Gentleman Elliot Rodger!"
He was also diagnosed with autism, for which he attended a special needs school.
Then we have Jake Davison, another certified sped who was diagnosed with autism as a child, and who expressed dismay about being an 'unemployed, autistic, poor, sexually frustrated male with tons of health issues'.
Nikolas Cruz, who also praised Elliot Rodger, writing in a YouTube comment: "Elliot Rodger will not be forgotten", was diagnosed as 'developmentally delayed' in 2002, and in a 2016 report was reported to suffer from depression, ADHD, and autism.
Chris Harper-Mercer of the 2015 Oregon shooting, who said that "My whole life has been one lonely enterprise. One loss after another. And here I am, 26, with no friends, no job, no girlfriend, a virgin. I long ago realized that society likes to deny people like me these things."
While those concerned about the danger of such an association are likely right to point out that autism doesn't inherently make one violent, it can't be denied that it is often a factor in leading young men like this down dark paths, as the social alienation and lack of...
...sexual/romantic success can leave them feeling hopeless and misanthropic.
What the solution to this is idk, but clearly society is failing autistic males and the consequences of leaving them in isolation to possibly fester in dark corners of the internet can be disastrous.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
One of the central themes encountered in the manosphere is the idea that online dating and particularly the dating app Tinder is facilitating women's 'hypergamous nature' and their riding of the 'chad cock carousel'...
...wherein large numbers of women are having sex with a small number of highly attractive men through the convenience of their phones.
While they're right that it's a lot harder for men to compete on dating apps, the narrative fails to acknowledge important context.
The first thing we have to deal with is the gender ratio, which tends to be completely disregarded by promoters of this narrative.
A study by Mobile Journey Marketing cloud provider Ogury conducted in Oct-Dec 2018 revealed a massive gender imbalance among dating app users.
New Pew Research Survey on OLD dropped recently.
3/10 Americans say they've used OLD, same amount as in 2019, but only 9% in the past year.
Those under 30 were more likely to have ever used it at 53%.
Men were also more likely to have used it at 34% vs. 27% for women...
..I'll add that the gender imbalance is even wider when it comes to current users.
It also found that 10% had met their partners/spouses through OLD, down from 12% in 2019, though the share of 18-29s who had was slightly higher at 20% compared to 17% in 2019.
Once again men actually report having a more positive experience on them than women (57%/48%) which seems contrary to the narrative that they've been an amazing blessing for women but terrible for the vast majority of guys. Of course the issues experienced will differ by gender.
A cope incels and co. will commonly put forth is that historically only 1 in 17 men have reproduced, and this is the natural hypergamy-driven sexual dynamic that results from a society without enforced monogamy. Generally a screencap of this article will be provided as a source.
The problem is that this headline is overzealous as the original study didn't prove that the bottleneck was due to polygamy (let alone hypergamy), only that from about 7-5k years ago there was a marked reduction in male genetic diversity, which could be for any number of reasons.
Polygamy/hypergamy is of course a possibility, but to such an extreme degree of course seems intuitively ridiculous. Wouldn't we expect a 'beta uprising' at some point? What are these cuck men getting out of this? How much paternal investment can these children be receiving?
@datepsych Not sure if you've dived into humour's effect on attractiveness yet, but this may be of interest to you.
It's been famously stated by Hitchens that "women aren't funny".
While many would dismiss this as a sexist myth, there is some solid empirical backing for it.
This meta-analysis of 36 studies which involved over 5,000 collective subjects (67% female) seems to agree, with an effect size of 0.321 and 63% of men scoring above the mean humour production ability of women.
Sex differences have also been detected in fMRI scans. Women show greater activation in the left prefrontal cortex (which implies a greater degree of 'executive processing and language based decoding') and also of the mesolimbic reward system when exposed to funny cartoons.
Alright so I'm going to try my hand at @datepsych's thing as I'd like to share some findings.
For the past 5 or so years, it has been echoed in the manosphere and beyond that the virginity rate among young men has soared up to where a third of young men now are virgins.
This is as far as I can tell based entirely on this graph posted by the washington post journalist behind the article on rising sexlessness, which emphasized the male role in the trend. As you can see the rate of 'virginity' apparently rose from 8% in 2008 to 27% in 2018.
This is sourced from the general social survey (GSS), so I whipped up a graph using the same data, in addition to the most recent survey. As you can see the rate in 2018 was actually 26%, so there must've been a mistake made when making the graph.