#SNP leadership: Humza Yousaf will reportedly say today that the SNP should have its own presence in Brussels "to help lay the groundwork" for Scotland joining the EU. Such an approach is far more likely to backfire thenational.scot/news/23346665.…
The Scottish Government already has a relatively large office in Brussels – which, naturally and appropriately, is focused on Scotland's relationships with the EU now, under the present constitution. That representation is surely sufficient for Scotland's current requirements
The singular mission for the Scottish Government, even one that desires independence, should be to build and sustain practical and mutually-beneficial relationships with EU partners at all levels. A political party office advocating independence would detract from that mission
More to the point, what would an SNP office/presence have as its goals? To tell the EU institutions and Member States that the SNP wants independence? They already know that. To encourage the same to speak favourably about Scottish EU membership? They won't do that.
Indeed, direct advocacy in Brussels from Scottish political parties supporting independence will make EU actors less likely, not more likely, to be disposed to working with Scotland. Fewer genuine relationships with EU partners would hinder, not help, an aim of EU membership
Those who want to lay the groundwork for Scottish EU membership should encourage the Scottish Government to develop a real post-Brexit EU relations strategy and should reflect on the reality that the EU accession process would depend on Scotland's degree of self-preparation –
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
#SNP leadership: Ash Regan said in this interview that joining EFTA would be the best "short-term solution for Scotland" to be part of the EU Single Market. EFTA is not and does not provide access to the Single Market. bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m0…
Joining EFTA alone provides a relationship with its members: Norway, Iceland, Liechtenstein and Switzerland. If Scotland wanted access to the Single Market without applying to join the EU, it would need to apply to join the European Economic Area (EEA)
Accession to the EEA is a process and it requires the support of all the EU Member States and the EEA EFTA states. While no non-EU country has ever directly joined the EEA since its establishment, EEA accession for Scotland could reasonably take several years
In fact, no – the future of the UK's nuclear weapons would surely have no practical bearing on Scotland's prospective EU membership application if it became an independent state. A thread #indyref2heraldscotland.com/politics/20255…
The placement and relocation of the UK's nuclear weapons as part of Scottish independence would be a serious issue and the parties would no doubt take it seriously. Trident would feature in the independence transition negotiations following a referendum
First of all, the transition negotiations would be complete by the time Scotland became an independent state. If it applied to join the EU, Scotland would do so after independence. So, at the point of its EU application, a solution on Trident would surely have already been found
Given the war and its implications, it is natural that defence & security now feature more in Scottish politics. However, the current short circuit to the nuclear weapons issue is not a substitute for a quality Holyrood debate in this area. A thread. heraldscotland.com/politics/20108…
First of all, it is positive that the Scottish Government speak more regularly and clearly of NATO and NATO membership these days. As I outlined in my @politicourant piece, the Ukraine war has reshaped the independence debate, with security a core concern bit.ly/35yHL0o
Nevertheless, the Holyrood debate in this area, as ever, needs some work. Chiefly, it is vital to be forthright about what the Ukraine war changes for Scotland and the UK and what it does not. European security has been upended; the Trident and independence issue not so much
As I argued in Scotland's EU Blueprint back in 2020, and more recently, an EU membership referendum for a post-independence Scotland would give democratic legitimacy and align with common practice. Yet the current debate on this issue is strange. A thread. bit.ly/SC-EU
At present, the entire conversation on a Scottish EU membership referendum seems fixed around the answer which Nicola Sturgeon gave last year to a convoluted question during the media Q&A of the SNP's manifesto launch for the 2021 Holyrood election
As with much of the wider campaign, the manifesto launch featured questions to the SNP on the detail of independence and EU membership which the party either did not expect or did not want (or both). Unsurprisingly, it wanted to focus on its manifesto
While the issue of the Scotland-England border and independence raises emotions for many, as noted in this @heraldscotland newsletter, borders are a factual reality of states. The question is not whether they exist, but how they are managed. A thread heraldscotland.com/politics/19729…
This piece suggests that a scenario of an independent Scotland in the EU and a residual UK out of the EU inevitably means a "hard border" between Scotland and England. The implication is that the main cause of a border is the difference on EU membership. The reality is otherwise
If Scotland became independent, it would have borders. It would have these borders regardless of whether it joined the EU, whatever its relationship with the UK. They would exist for a purpose – to define where the Scottish state began and ended. That is what independence means
This draft resolution for the SNP's November conference on an independent Scotland's relationships with the EU and the UK, reported by @kacnutt, significantly oversimplifies the issues in question. Its arguments raise multiple points of concern. A thread. thenational.scot/news/19671503.…
First, the resolution states that an independent Scotland should join the EU "in order to access free markets and increase trade with our nearest neighbours." That is a values-free, economics-only argument for joining the EU – mirroring the UK's approach to its former membership
Joining the EU would transform Scotland's constitutional order and change the nature of the Scottish state. It would require a convincing, values-based argument for why Scotland should be part of the EU, well beyond trade, and how it would contribute to European integration