Get ‘unstuck’ on neurodynamics for lumbar radicular pain.
A brief thread. 🧵
We’ve recently had some content on nerve mechanosensitivity and lumbar radicular pain. I thought it’d be a good opportunity to share some work, and my thoughts on neurodynamics as a treatment.
1⃣ Can lumbar nerve roots get stuck?
It seems so, or indeed it is possible. Those with painful lumbar radiculopathy associated with disc-related nerve compression have been shown to have reduced lumbar nerve root excursion compared to contralateral limb and controls.
2⃣ Neurodynamics
Neurodynamics is a term used to describe a series of novel, low-load stretches claimed to preferentially move, glide, and ‘floss’ tethered nerves and through soft tissue structures (interfaces). This approach is proposed to improve the health of these tissues, thereby aiding in pain relief and healing. It was made popular by Michael Shacklock, David Butler, and their colleagues.
In cases of lumbar radicular pain, these tissues include the spinal cord via the conus, lumbosacral nerve roots, associated peripheral nerves, and somatic structures. Its not just the sciatica nerve!!!
Here is a video by the @Physiotutors on sliders and tensioners.
1⃣ What are modic changes
2⃣ LBP associations
3⃣ Management with antibiotics
4⃣ Closing thoughts
Disclaimer: While I am not an interventionalist, it does not preclude me from being critical of the care my patients may otherwise receive🫡
1⃣What are modic changes.
Modic changes refer to observations on lumbar MRI at the vertebral endplate, most commonly seen at the bottom two lumbar levels. They are thought to be related to previous disc herniations and were first described by Modic and colleagues in 1988.
Modic changes are categorized based on visual characteristics and proposed composition.
They are classified into Type 1, 2, and 3. Modic 1 changes correspond to oedema (fluid) at the endplate, appearing hypointense on T1-weighted MRI and hyperintense on T2-weighted MRI with fat suppression (see images below).
Images courtesy of @Radiopaedia
Modic 2 changes correspond to fat replacement. Hyperintense on both T1w and T2w MRI (see below)
Modic 3 changes correspond to sclerotic or fibrotic changes and are hypointense on both T1w and T2w MRI.
Do you know the differences between your disc bulges & your herniations? How they classified?
I've been playing about with some illustrations for my 'Navigating Painful Radiculopathy course in 2024. So here we go.
First of all, it's important to know that there are different schemas.
The following is based on a consensus paper here:
These are used by my radiology department. If you review imaging, check what they use. If it's not standard? Should it be?pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24768732/
1️⃣ THE NORMAL DISC
Here is the 'normal disc'.
No dessications (dehydration) AKA loss of disc height, annular fissures, schmorl nodes or end plate changes, e.g. modics (oedema).
No bulging/herniation. The annular tissue does not project beyond the vertebral bodies - pink line
Below is a tweetorial on Diagnostics Labels in Low Back Pain.
1⃣ Labels. An easy fit, A societal expectation!
2⃣ The opposition
3⃣ Non-specific LBP
4⃣ Evidence to support Non-specific LBP
Its a bit of long one but i hope its helpful.
Diagnostic Labels (DLs) in Low Back Pain (LBP).
Any good?
1⃣ An easy fit, A societal expectation!
Clinicians like DLs
We pride ourselves on them.
They imply a degree of mastery and skill
They offer a vocabulary
They set boundaries and bundle up info – a bit like jargon.
People can also like DLs
They can validate & legitimise problems
They can lessen stigma and trivialisation – at home, at work and play.
There is also an expectation that they will lead to a cure or tailored treatments