1. A teacher comments on a student’s work. How many feedback loops are happening in each of the following?
- the student never sees it.
- the student sees it but the teacher doesn’t know.
- the student sees it & discusses with the teacher.
2. Is feedback a thing that happens or a thing that is?
3. Is feedback something that promotes learning, or something that describes a process of learning?
4. What conditions are necessary for feedback to exist?
5. Is it a necessary condition of feedback that output contributes (directly or indirectly) to input?
6. Can you have feedback without anyone learning anything?
7. Can teachers “give” feedback? Can students “receive” it?
8. Can feedback be “uptaken” or “engaged with”, or does feedback only exist where there is already engagement?
9. If a student tries something and nobody is around, can/does feedback happen?
(I know what @davidjnicol would say, what about others?)
10. If it describes a process of learning, whose process is it?
11. If it’s a student’s learning process, what is the role of the teacher or other in that process?
12. Who is the most important participant in a feedback process? Who is the most active? Who should be?
13. Who is responsible for the quality of feedback?
What about the effectiveness / impact?
14. Can a teacher commenting on a student’s work constitute feedback for the teacher?
15. Can feedback be collective (e.g. for the student-and-teacher team)?
16. Having thought about these questions, would you change your answer to question 1?
17. Does generative AI change any of this? Does it highlight anything interesting?
Ps the word "quiz" might imply that there are right answers and that I know what they are. I have *my* answers but I meant this more as a prompts for discussion thing.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Can we approach assessment via values (what matters), purposes (what we’re trying to achieve with students) & context (who are our students, what are they studying, at what level? What infrastructure, systems, policies &culture are in place?)
Tech and methods are important but we need to keep a close eye on values, purposes and context because they're easily forgotten in knee-jerk or head-in-sand responses.
Amid the hype &panic around ChatGPT, where should we focus our response? On other technologies? Student attitudes and behaviour? Assessment practices?
There's a temptation to give ChatGPT too much influence in assessment reform. It’s just one of many considerations.
IMO there’s an assumption that TEL should involve something new that teachers and students haven't done much before. But we also know that getting used to an approach over time is important in terms of efficacy.
Why were things we called technology enhanced learning before the pandemic (e.g. recorded presentations, online quizzes and polls, discussion forums, wikis and uses of social media) thought of as inferior after the pandemic?
Thoughts on themes & results in #ThematicAnalysis. There are many ways to think about this, here's mine (currently).
Themes don't emerge, but also themes are not your results. They're ways of organising data that help you tell a story about some aspects of your research area.
Themes aren't right or wrong, they're just more or less interesting. Themes like "barriers" and "drivers" aren't *wrong*, they're just usually not conducive to interesting stories. Maybe they suggest a need to keep looking for themes that will help tell a richer story.
Look for themes that you wouldn't have thought of before you started analysing the data. Look for themes that surprise you. That's where the really good stories are.
On the last day of #UoELTConf22, I'll be chairing Neil Speirs and colleagues on "A quiet, unnoticed form of gentle solidarity" and @sbayne on "The ‘mode 3’ university: Is this our future?" Looking forward to it!
Neil plays confronting video of Edinburgh student stories of exclusion, isolation, loneliness, patronisation, bullying, inferiority complex due to social class. Gathered over 20 years but could still be told today. Accents, wealth, privilege, elitism. #UoELTConf22
Classism involves ongoing sustaining of barriers to access of resources for some, and the easing of access for others. Does university teaching still presuppose and reinforce the privileged upbringing of middle and upper classes? #UoELTConf22
This morning at #UoELTConf22, @robzker asks why, after introducing more compassionate policies around assessment during the pandemic, we would go back to less compassionate policy. How can we tackle uncaring practices and reimagine a more compassionate education?
This is interesting - can cynicism about institutions come from a place of caring? @robzker questions punishment as strength and compassion as weakness. Why should we never do "hand-holding"? Does caring have to be tough love? (my phrasing). #UoELTConf22
Why do we even need to argue about this, what brought us to this place? Where can we go from here? Great provocations, thanks @robzker#UoELTConf22
The #UoELTConf22 begins! Looking forward to a rich 3 days of all things learning and teaching.
First @colmharmon welcomes us with a reminder that we can put longitudinal development at the core of ideas of the university. #UoELTConf22
Next @cathybovill talks co-creation with students. It takes "freedom with discipline". Staff don't need to lose their expertise for students to be meaningful partners. #UoELTConf22