From inciting calls to violence beforehand to justification afterwards, Israeli right-wing leaders were quick to excuse - and justify - the rampage.
Smotrich's latest comments aren't the only ones. Just take a look:
🧵>>>
"I liked a tweet that called to erase the village of Huwara because I think the village of Huwara needs to be erased. The state of Israel is the one that needs to erase it."
Bezalel Smotrich, Finance Minister, MK Religious Zionism party
"[Huwara] isn't a Palestinian village. It's a transit route which all of the residents of the Gav HaHar [settlements] drive on."
Tzvi Sukkot MK, Religious Zionism party
"[...]The village of Huwara must be wiped out today.
Enough with all the talk of construction and strengthening the settlement movement;the deterrence that has been lost must be returned right now; and there's no room for mercy."
D.Ben Zion, Deputy Head Samaria Regional Council
"The actions [...] in Huwara created the strongest deterrent that the State of Israel has had since Operation Defensive Shield (in 2002). After a murder like we saw yesterday we need villages to burn as long as the IDF is not operating."
Tzvika Fogel MK, Jewish Power Party
"Unfortunately, I can understand the impatience and pain of these citizens. A strong Israel must act with an iron fist."
Nissim Vaturi MK, Deputy Speaker of the Knesset, Likud party
"The only condemnation that will come out of my mouth is a condemnation of [Palestinian] terrorists, cruel and primitive murderers who take our lives… I do not judge and will not condemn people in their time of suffering."
Talli Gotliv MK, Likud party, in Knesset debate
(On the Israeli soldiers stationed in Huwara)"Why are the security forces here? We have weapons, we can defend ourselves, let them go and catch the terrorists."
Daniella Weiss, leader of the Nahala settler movement
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Has your lecture been cancelled because the IDF broke into the university with live fire and stun grenades? For the third time in the course of three months, the IDF raided Birzeit. Why? Let's talk about Order 101, the IDF’s law banning freedom of speech and assembly🧵
Order 101, aka “Order Regarding Prohibition of Incitement and Hostile Propaganda”, is a military decree that the IDF issued just two months after it occupied the West Bank in 1967. This order criminalises a wide array of civic activities.
The last raid on Birzeit was notably violent, but breaking into the university is part of the IDF's routine. The IDF framed the recent attack as an operation against a “pro-terrorist gathering”, a typical justification within Order 101.
🟨IDF’s Yellow Line in Gaza.
56% of Gaza’s territory is now under Israel’s military control. The new temporary border, the Yellow Line, may become permanent. We can’t let this happen. What you must know about the Yellow Line (Fire-policy, destruction, settlements) 🧵
According to the plan, the IDF will withdraw from the Yellow Line to a more distant perimeter within the Gaza Strip and will be replaced by an International Stabilization Force. Meanwhile, Israel’s actions indicate a lack of any genuine commitment to withdrawal.
East of the Yellow Line, Israel has carried out continuous demolitions in a manner that suggests an intention to maintain a permanent military presence there. Israel has also constructed more than a dozen new military outposts along the Yellow Line.
On Friday, a horrifying terror attack took place inside Israel in which two Israelis were brutally murdered. However, it’s the aftermath of the attack that provides us with a clear example of how Israel’s security establishment operates. Here’s why:
The terrorist, who entered Israel through a hole in the separation barrier, apparently came from the city of Qabatiya in the West Bank. Immediately after the attack, security forces raided the city, using air support and mortar fire. Many were arrested, and a curfew was imposed.
The raid’s goal seemed to be less about investigating the attack itself and more about sending a message to the entire population: terror doesn’t pay. In reality, if you're a Palestinian living in the oPt, you're guilty until proven innocent anyway, regardless of your actions.
For the past two years, the IDF has systematically been using Palestinians as human shields. Here is an especially chilling testimony from a soldier who served in Gaza: “One was 16 years old [...] if there’s an IED [an explosive device], they get blown up.” >>>
“In one of my last deployments [to Gaza], a debate started after an incident referred to as the “mosquito protocol.” We were on the coastal road, and lots of people were walking towards Rafah, and then, they grabbed these two guys and used them to open up locations”
- Palestinians?
- Yes, Palestinians, one was 16 years old. Our interrogator told us they had ties [to Hamas]. By that point, you’re already second-guessing what you’re told, because, obviously, you could say about anyone in Gaza that they’re somehow connected to Hamas.
Here's the gist: the IDF is still using food as a weapon.
Today, the IDF announced daily “humanitarian pauses” and resumed airdrops of aid into Gaza. But this doesn’t mark a policy shift, just a new phase in the same twisted logic of control through aid🧵
As early as the first days of the war, the IDF has sporadically restricted food access in Gaza, deliberately limiting what goes in and when. By March 2, 2025, this escalated into a total siege. For 11 weeks, no food was allowed in.
The claim was that Hamas was stealing aid and using food to control civilians and profit. But even if it were true, that wouldn’t justify denying food to millions.
Muhammad Al-Fara, an elderly man with special needs, was killed by a targeted strike in Khan Younis earlier this year. Why? According to the IDF, “he was marked as a terrorist.”
So what qualifies someone as a terrorist according to the IDF? >>>
“You detect a threat or something — you shoot”
Soldiers who testified to Breaking the Silence described extremely lax rules of engagement, where many times suspicion alone can justify lethal force:
“At first, the commands were: We're at war. If you detect a threat or something — you shoot. At first, you could also shoot 2,000 meters [away]."
When a threat is detected?
"When a hot spot is seen (with thermal binoculars)"
Is a hot spot a human being?
"Supposedly, that's how the Armored Corps thinks. Then you fire a shell, tons of ammo.”
[Sgt. 1st class | Southern Gaza Strip | Oct-Nov 2023]