1. From @RollingStone ... Whereas the public had previously seen the Queen as a longstanding grandmother of the nation, Charles is not the country’s grandfather so much as a blank emblem of the royal family.
2. “I don’t know what there is to gain for artists by associating with him,” says Meg. “With the Queen, she was fab and glamorous to some people. Charles doesn’t add anything — there’s not a legacy of his that anyone (@Adele@eltonofficial, etc) would want to align with.
3. It’s televised, so a lot of people will hear your songs, sure, but in terms of long-term PR strategy, I don’t know if performing would add positively to an artist’s narrative unless they were staunchly pro the monarchy.”
4. No worthy artists want to be associated with Charles and Camilla @RoyalFamily and @KensingtonRoyal They are seeing the destruction that they're trying to do to #HarryandMeghan, and all of the other scandals including Andrew and the treatment of Diana & they are just saying...
5. The colonialism of the British empire has been a major discussion point over the past two years. That is behind the struggle to secure A-List British acts, says Hak Baker, a musician from London:
6. “Any situation where I’d bow to an openly racist colonial imperial system that refuses to apologise for its past and eradication of my people’s history I’d rather avoid with a barge pole. We are more aware of the past now.
7. They are not exempt from recognition. I think they’re going to have a hard time.” Han Mee of Manchester band Hot Milk agrees emphatically, calling it an “outdated institution” that does not represent modern Britain.
8. “Leave it in the past, it’s as old, aged, and expensive as the whiskey that props it up but without the strength and merriment,” she says. “I liked Liz, but it should have died with her – the coronation is a kick in the teeth when
9. this country has never been more of a shit show.” The real question is: Why do the royals need this entertainment value at all? “No one’s talking about the date or the guests,” considers Meg. “The big headlines around the coronation right now are
10. which musicians are in and which musicians are out, which underlines the importance of music and what the symbolism is of an endorsement from one of these megastar artists.” It appears that in 2023 the royal family needs musicians more than musicians need them.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I don't know why anyone expects Charles @RoyalFamily to be anything else than what he is - 1. Friends w notorious paedo Jimmy Savile 2. Married a teenager and didn't love her 3. Was jealous & insecure of Diana's popularity 4. Cheated on Diana repeatedly 5. Wanted to be a tampon
6. Divorced his wife, left her no protection 7. Made his children walk behind their mum's coffin 8. Moved the mistress (Camilla) in 9. Promised never to marry her, then married her 10. Promised she would never be Queen, now QC 11. Allowed her to use William @KensingtonRoyal
12. Allowed her to use Harry to bury stories abt her drugs addicted son. 13. Charles and Camilla sold William and Harry to the tabloids for favourable press of them 14. Is spineless against William's incandescent rage 15. Has refused to officially title his mixed-race grandkids
1. I posted a tweet about #MeghanMarkle today and in the clip she spoke abt how she was scared and feared for her life and the life of her kids. I would say a large portion of the hateful, and vile comments that tweet got was from white women hiding behind @KensingtonRoyal pics.
2. Of course I punch harder than you can punch at me in my responses, but while I am not surprised or shocked, I guess I am disappointed in the amount of women that felt it was okay to denigrate another woman especially a WOC and a mother with lies and downright falsehoods.
3. I've said this before I am NOT a monarchist, or royalist, I've grown up in 3 countries that are sovereign to Britain including living in the UK, and I've seen how useless the actual @RoyalFamily is when it comes to anything of substance for British subjects.
1. Harry almost lost #MeghanMarkle because of the way he spoke to her in an argument:
“She was calm, but said in a quiet, level tone that she would never stand for being spoken to like that,” Harry writes. “I nodded.”
2. Markle also said she would not “tolerate” that behavior in the future, with Harry writing, “She wasn’t going to raise children in an atmosphere of anger or disrespect. She laid it all out, super-clear.”
3. When the former actress went on to ask where her partner’s outburst “came from” and whether he “overhear[d] adults speak that way … growing up,” the prince replied, “Yes.”