a popular pastime today involves people recording themselves playing "video games" and broadcasting this to others who watch. sometimes, these broadcasters use computers to make it look like animated characters are playing the video game. i dont understand why any of this is happening.
recently one such broadcaster lost her job. the reason for this is that she accepted a sponsorship to play a game based on a childrens book about wizards. the author of the wizard book is unpopular with a subset of people who disagree with her outspoken views on "trans women." we'll get to what this means in a moment.
today, a common mode of expressing disagreement with a person is to complain loudly and publicly to that persons employer in hopes of getting them fired to stop the public complaints. this is called "cancelling."
trans women are people who broadly speaking were born with sex chromosomes that produce masculine anatomy and physiology who "identify" as women and often though not universally use hormones or surgery to better conform to conventional notions of femininity. the scope of things that one may "identify" as is complex and probably inconsistently defined. generally, gender is in, and race is out.
even in the case of gender, there is substantial and often violent debate around the extent to which identification ought to be accommodated in public spaces. for reasons that are not generally discussed, accommodation of trans women is more controversial than accommodation of trans men.
the author of the wizard book on which the video game was based openly opposes the notion of accommodating transgender identification and as a result has become a controversial figure. this has alienated many people, who consequently identify any product based on her books--including the video game in question--as representative of an anti-accommodation position.
consequently, a subset of trans women and their supporters criticized the animated broadcaster who took a sponsorship to play the wizard book video game, and they have apparently succeeded in cancelling her. because this animated broadcaster was generally seen as wholesome and well-loved, other trans women and their supporters are concerned that the reputations and standing of trans women will suffer as a consequence.
i know this is a lot to take in and imagine you are thinking back to your days fighting in the ardennes and wondering what sequence of events over three quarters of a century has transported you from that world to this one. ill pause now and take some questions.
@BryanCLee2 report from mom is "2nd Battalion 309th infantry regiment (lightning brigade). ardennes, rhineland, central europe"
digging a bit, looks like probably the 78th infantry division, "brigade" an error
you wake up in a cold sweat. its december 13th, 1944 and you are just across the border from belgium. "hormones? computers? what are you talking about anon. get your goddamn rifle its time to take kesternich"
ive lost interest in the vtuber. having tracked down my grandfather's unit (78th division, 309th infantry regiment, 2nd battalion--that's him by the tank above) I'm now tracing his course in the war
his battalion led the division's first assault of the war. it was bad
think i recall from a secondhand story another man in his company was killed right next to him almost immediately
after the initial battle for the town left the 78th in control of the western half, the division took up defensive positions while the battle of the bulge more substantially raged to the south
2d pic is kesternich pinpointed, 3d is rough location vs the main bulge offensive
After the Bulge, the division took the rest of Kesternich, then split. The 311th headed east to take Ruhrburg (yellow) before turning north, 310th went NE to reduce two strongholds of Strauch and Steckenborn (green), and my grandfather's 309th (red) went around to cut off retreat
their ultimate target, the strategic fortress city of Schmidt, had been attacked before, in the previous year's Hurtgen Forest offensive
it had gone very badly
honestly the original attack from the north, across the Kall river (blue emphasis), along a valley with high points controlled by the enemy was completely nuts
they actually managed to briefly hold the town but were driven back by an armored counteroffensive
78th's offensive involved three regiments rather than one which presumably helped, as did taking a different approach that allowed their armor to participate in the battle
309th took Kommerscheidt (red), the others focused on the core of Schmidt
by the end Schmidt was leveled
after Schmidt fell, the 78th moved quickly to take a dam on the Rur southeast of the town. if it were destroyed it would have the usual catastrophic effects from dam bursts in war (a minor release had already been used, to effect)
fortunately it was captured without issue
after the capture of the dam and Schmidt, the uneven and forested terrain west of the Rur gave way to open plains up to the Rhine, and the 78th dashed across the fields with great rapidity. the Wehrmacht practically melted before them
zoomed out for context
on the banks of that great river in the town of Remagen, the 9th Armored discovered to their delight that the Ludendorff Bridge, a military railway crossing, still stood because the Germans had used shit tier explosives during demolition
the 78th, nearby, was immediately sent in
they, and other divisions that followed, rapidly established a bridgehead and secured the east bank
the Ludendorff Bridge finally collapsed ten days after capture but by then, with the far bank secured, new bridges had been established
this was a fell stroke against the enemy
this bridging was accomplished by mid March. I'm a bit fuzzy about what came next. For the rest of the war in Europe, which ended 8 May, they were involved in the dissolution of the major pocket of german forces in the Ruhr
in November, they moved to Berlin
occupying Berlin was an important event in my grandfather's life, although he did not come to understand the extent of it until 65 years later
He had a good life after the war. My grandmother gave him five children; he had a career as a chemical engineer, and he didnt seem as badly affected by the war as others in my family. His hearing was damaged by artillery, but this (much later) left him eligible for a pension.
I find myself thinking more of him lately. He's so old, now. But was barely half my own age when he was thrown into the largest conflagration in history, and played his own part in its bloody resolution.
I wonder if it all seems as strange to him as my years do to me.
the reason that nerds are unhappy about trump firing federal reserve people isnt because they particularly like those specific people
issue is that it makes the fed look beholden to the executive and this is a very bad outcome for economic stability
the fed hasnt covered itself in glory lately for sure but the counterfactual where its progressively and openly politicized is pretty much just a world of hyperinflation and impoverishment because thats a side effect of how unstable governments use politicized central banks
i think a steelman for "end the fed" is that we've left this absurdly powerful yet nigh defenseless institution sitting in plain sight like a loaded gun during a period of immensely high trust and as that period comes to a close someone is gonna make a first grab at the pistol
ok finally discovered a kind of lore i want to know about in a non clickbait way:
what one-shotted you?
eg for me it was 90s movies about how having a career and a house in the burbs is the worst thing that can ever happen to someone
i didn't realize i'd been Had until my 30s
everyone will give boomers and millennials shit about the social justice and narcissism, and rightly so. but the motherfuckers who tricked me into nearly ruining my life are genx
for those of you not familiar getting one shotted is getting wrecked on first contact with something. classic deployment attached
"everyone is the same and nations are fake" is the core dogma of the mid-late 20C liberalism that grew out of the war era. in the years since it's become a mostly-unstated and broadly-unassailable assumption of imperial policy
regrettably it is also disastrously incorrect
the history of this idea is worth studying. you can see the modern notion start to emerge in the progressive era and out of socialist thought, and gain some traction with (eg) the league of nations
ideologues might say that league failed bc it wasn't REAL world government
among socialism-inclined intellectuals, which is to say nearly all intellectuals until molotov-ribbentrop broke some out of their reveries, ww1 was understood to be a failure _caused by_ national identity
the leftist compulsion to degrade national identity in democratic countries will be the undoing of their welfare state plank, because it turns out when you remove the nation people just default to narrower identities and don't care to pay for the outgroup's well-being
you can get support for fargroups in time limited cases. there's a long history of (eg) american assistance for people on the other side of the world in disaster recovery
but duration breeds resentment, and organized charity is very hard to maintain with this sentiment
when you're talking about an outgroup for whom that resentment is ingrained and continuously salient, forget it
"multiculturalism" kills welfare states in the long run
amusingly this was one reason some of the more libertarian neoliberals supported open borders
i was disappointed that liberals did nothing in the face of the awokening. but that can at least be explained as cowardess
what's worse is that the awokening is over, they're not taking the fact that the awokening occurred as a serious problem to be guarded against going forward
one is left with the impression that either they are fine with everything that happened or they learned absolutely nothing from the experience. both of these possibilities seem disqualifying
what is the point of liberals who can't be bothered to care for liberty, one wonders