The part of US foreign policy that has always troubled me the most is Rhodesia/Zimbabwe.
Mugabe is a hall of fame madman, starving millions, wanton slaughter, etc.
But 🇺🇸 HAD to depose Ian Smith while Mugabe enjoyed almost 4 decades of absolute rule. Why?
The British especially adored Mugabe, even knighting him. All of these people would later claim that he "became" a monster but was Good Ole Bob at the beginning.
This is of course a lie, he was already butchering his former allies by '81
The basic claims of the west are the Human Rights thing. But I have seen several 'realpolitik' explanations:
1. Americans like Jimmy Carter supported mugabe to get the black vote in America
2. The british were mad about Smith cutting ties to the UK
3. The whole thing was a bizarre cold war gambit by Henry Kissinger (Washington Post)
A funny thing in the WaPo article, the final paragraph basically admits the primary american foreign policy ethical justification is bullshit 😂😂
The civil rights act as the galactic constitution. Why are we even talking about the Cold War when the US is backing the communists in this conflict? 😂😂
Interesting. Mugabe was a skilled politician. He really is the blueprint of 'big man tyrant' style rule. I have studied dictators alot and you would be surprised at how agile and clever he was at maintaining power against all (internal, black) rivals
Of course "politician" is different in africa than it is in say California. It's not winning votes, more maintaining a careful balance of power among your supporters and the men with rifles
There were many internal plots to seize power as happens regularly in such countries
A bizarre line in his wikipedia. Mugabe PERPETRATED the genocide. He said that he just got a little crazy and he was sorry for killing and torturing so many of his subjects. This was ~3 years into his 40 years of rule
Imagine holding on to power through tough times like this- life expectancy in the early 30s!
How did he do it? "Operation Drive Out the Rubbish." Basically, if your neighborhood voted against him, he bulldozed all your houses.
Good election strategy 😎👍
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
My favorite is the implied difference in the game back then: the guy tells him "Watch yourself, Terry." Because back then a good primary strategy was to cripple the quarterback lol.
-3 on the tree
-mustard yellow one of those great 70s colors never coming back like puke green
-there is no way that truck even has air conditioning
-italy flag on the guys helmet. He's probably in some mobbed up union lol
Why is Terry driving a longbed? You would drive this if you worked on a farm lmao.
*I'm sorry it's not 3 on the tree
If you were just a country boy like Terry you still want to drive a truck you'd get a shortbed 4x4 with lots of options. This thing is pure work truck. Glorious
Listening to a podcast on feudal Japan and the narrator keeps explicitly separating two groups as distinct things: The Aristocracy and “Military Elites.”
He doesn’t explain this. If you’re speaking English understand these words mean exactly the same thing in feudal Europe
If the emperor is not a guy with the ability to orchestrate mass violence, like oh that’s someone else’s thing?
That makes NO sense in Euro perspective so don’t skip over that. If that’s the shoguns job then the shogun is emperor and emperor is like the pope to us
I shut it off. This is why you have to learn some general history before you learn everything about a specific period if you’re gonna teach
-1st turn advantage too high
-with no randomization it leads to memorization being too strong
-pro chess won't survive after people realize there's no real way to stop cheating without methods too expensive for a competition that makes little money
This is political nonsense. You could just say “Republicans buy podcasts too” and keep the rest of this to yourself, but you were a journalist, so let’s take a look at this blather 🧵
So Trump is not the moral paragon you are. I’m glad my attorney isn’t either.
For you, a politician should put more stock in shitty books they were read in college above delivering for their essential coalition. Good luck with that. Ask Jim Clyburn if that’s how he governs.
Literally everyone in America has some policy they agree with libertarians on. If your a klansman you agree with them on civil rights law, if you’re a communist you agree with them on gay marriage. It’s meaningless.
None of this is true, and the only reason people can get away with saying it is that he was shot.
1. Civil war- Despite having way more manpower and the factories, the war dragged on far too long. He picked bad generals for a long time because it made his political life easier.
2. Commitment to abolishing slavery- this didn't exist until Dred Scott. As an attorney he happily defended slaveowners and hardly ever any free blacks. There's a letter here and there but zero commitment until it became obvious it could save his failing political career.
3. Uniting a divided nation- LOL. Nobody left or right wing believes this anymore. Is that what you call the next 50 years of reconstruction, jim crow, the klan, or the 1876 election debacle?
People think im joking when I say moviebob is the true innovator of left wing political thought in the internet era. Every wild take today is something he said 10 years ago and was shunned by his fellow leftists for saying.
Here’s a great example. Something RWers have noticed is the “marvel-brain” thing among the left. Movies and characters in it are treated as real, especially when it comes to moral examples and standards. Yeah, he did that before the marvel reboot.
He got his current job because he was able to predict every twist in the marvel cinematic universe before it even happened. He was so one with the Marvel brain, he was precognitive of it. He’s the pope and prophet of the New Left, despite them; They canceled him for being too early