#Telfam
The #MWC23 page on the @telcoin website included an interesting bread crumb that may clarify the path the company is taking with the Federal Reserve.
Read on..
2) As far as I can tell, this is the first time they have used the language ‘Fed-Chartered’, which is different from being approved for a Master Account with the Fed, or approved for ‘Federal rails’ as Rajesh had stated previously.
4) As I think I mentioned in one of the previous threads, Anchorage Digital Bank staked their claim as the ‘First Ever Federally Chartered Digital Asset Bank’; HOWEVER, that's not the 'whole grail' for Fed approvals.
5) Federal Charters are handed out by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), an independent bureau of the U.S. Department of the Treasury. Not the Federal Reserve. occ.gov/about/what-we-…
6) For Anchorage, it essentially means they entered under 'Federal' oversight, via the OCC, as of Dec 2020. It does not provide them any additional access or permissions as a company. And it does not place them under the direct oversight of the Federal Reserve.
IMO, if the new language means anything (it very well may not), IN ADDITION TO their application for a Fed master account, they are pursuing a Fed-Charter with the OCC as a more attainable first step given the FTX fallout.
8) Which makes Anchorage Digital the closest known Crypto Bank competitor that is also seeking a Fed Master Account (now that Custodia and Kraken have effectively been eliminated from contention).
9) If we look for potential advantages @telcoin may have over Anchorage in terms of the race to be ‘The First Crypto Bank to join the Federal Reserve’ (or some headline along those lines), we can speculate around a few:
10) FIRST - @telcoin bought shares in a Nebraska State-Charted Member Bank of the Federal Reserve. Meaning a bank that already has a Master Account with the Federal Reserve and is therefore already regulated by the Fed, rather than the FDIC/OCC.
12) a. It means a State Member Bank of the Federal Reserve, that has to deal with the most rigorous Fed reporting requirements, vouched for the financial integrity and most importantly, the risk-management structure when it comes to customer funds, of @telcoin.
13) b. If the amount of shares purchased by @telcoin was 25% or more, it would make them a ‘Bank Holding Company’ by definition (since they were already a chartered bank themselves).
14) According to the the ‘Bank Holding Company Act of 1956’, they would then be required to “register with the Board and submit to supervision”. Additionally, the transaction itself may have triggered a filing with the Fed and a subsequent review.
15) So essentially, what I’m suggesting is they are doing everything they can to position the company under the direct supervision of the Federal Reserve, and by doing so...
17) SECOND - Anchorage Digital Bank National Association is Fed-Charted to offer custody and settlement services for customers; HOWEVER, as their website states clearly: “Anchorage Digital does not engage in the offer, sale or trading of digital assets.” anchorage.com/insights/the-b…
18) They do have a separate LLC where they offer those services (Anchorage Hold, LLC), but that entity is not included in the Fed-Charter. So in other words, besides the race to be the first Crypto bank member of the Federal Reserve, they may not be an actual competitor of $TEL.
19) THIRD - Anchorage Digital had an action taken against them by their regulators. They received a Cease & Desist order from the OCC, for "engaging in violations of law and regulation, including 12 C.F.R. § 21.21 (Bank Secrecy Act/anti-money laundering (BSA/AML).
19) That certainly doesn’t help their case for a Master Account, right? occ.gov/static/enforce…
20) So look, this is not financial advice. I’m not a banking expert. All of this could be completely inaccurate. If anyone out there in the #Telfam is, it would be great to get your opinion. BUT if I'm even in the ballpark? $TEL is going to be a juggernaut.
#telfam The more I read up on it, the more it seems that the timing of @telcoin's Federal approval hinges on the outcome of the Custodia case against the Fed.
So let's get into the weeds on that. Read on:
2) The latest news is U.S. District Court of Wyoming Judge Scott Skavdahl ruled this past Friday (11-Nov) that Custodia’s case warrants a trial. bankingdive.com/news/custodia-…
3) The Fed argued that the 2 year delay in approving Custodia is not unreasonable because digital asset banks “present substantial risks and complexities requiring careful and diligent review.”
2) Firstly, a point of clarification: Regarding who would ultimately stamp the approval of @telcoin's master account with the Fed - The Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City overseas that part of the country. federalreserve.gov/aboutthefed/fe…
3) However, the CEO of Fed Bank Kansas is a member of the FOMC so it would be hard to imagine the overarching ‘Board of Governors’ isn’t involved in the decision, given the spotlight on it.
2) It seems the Federal approval that @telcoin is seeking is not from the FDIC. In fact, they might not have any interest in that at all (yet), as I had thought.
3) That much was stated plainly by @telcoin's attorney (Mark) during a Nebraska hearing all the way back on Feb 23, 2021. Here’s the transcript from that hearing. It's fascinating to hear Mark and Paul (CEO) talk about all of this: nebraskalegislature.gov/FloorDocs/107/…
#telfam I don't usually do this but what we heard this week confirms for me what I had hoped was happening behind the scenes at @telcoin. This is by no means financial advice. I’m just tired of the BS out there - good and bad. Read on:
2) Here's what I've gathered (and some speculation to consider):
Telcoin LLC (@telcoin) is a blockchain tech start-up founded in 2017. It’s a real company run by real people, with actual licenses all over the world.
3) During the previous bear market, they completely overhauled the company and its original staff, including 1 of the 2 original founders (though the community has suspicions that he’s still lurking around and (IMO) seems to be collecting a royalty percentage).