Once, when Sundaramoorthy Naayanar was on a yatra to Chola temples, he crossed a river & continued to walk near Mazhapaadi, an area covered by dense Konnai trees.
He heard a voice: "Sundaram, Ennai Marandhaayo?" (Sundaram, did you forget me?) but it was not from any human (1/5)
Shocked, he enquired the locals if there were any temples around.
With their guidance, he discovered a small temple fully covered by Konnai trees (golden shower) that were fully bloomed.
This Kondrai flower is a favorite of Lord Shiva, who is called கொன்றை வேந்தன் (2/5)
Sundarar started singing: "Dear Lord, what question did you ask me? How can I think of anyone else forgetting you?"
And started singing:
"பொன்னார் மேனியனே!
அன்னே உன்னையல்லால் இனி யாரை நினைக்கேனே?" This verse is the favorite of Sendhan Amudhan from Ponniyin Selvan.
Here's Ramya's life journey: a coming-of-age tale of a perennially hormonal, self-centered girl who constantly makes bad life choices and then blames her parents or society for it.
An analysis of the psyche of a Bad Girl (1/12)
Open panna, Ramya is 16. Studies in Dronacharya Gurukulam (PSBB) that has Sri Ramajayam written on all boards.
Her age and her scores are a perfect match: has 16 marks out of 100 in MPC subjects, so the Brahminical school "denied" her any fun.
But she has her own fun anyways
As early as Class 9, she had a BF. The irony? Sidhu had proposed to her friend, got rejected, and Ramya the empathic martyr, accepts him out of pity.
Not out of romance. Out of dependence.
The kind that mistakes “being chosen” for “being seen.”
They have "fun" in the school's secret furniture room many times. Later, he moves on to someone else and she overhears him calling her an item. Yet Ramya never learns about boys from this episode.
It is one thing to excel at one chosen field, but entirely another to rule the roost in six different fields - Law, Theatre, Cinema, Journalism, Writing and Political Strategy.
On his birthday, let us take a look at the CV of the multifaceted Cho Ramaswamy (1/10)
Born in Chennai to Srinivasan and Rajammal on Oct 5, 1934, Cho did his SSLC in PS Higher Secondary, Mylapore in Tamil Medium.
He did Intermediate from Loyola, and got a B Sc in Geography in Vivekananda College - as it was the easiest to get admitted to (According to him😁).
He then got his Bachelors in Law in 1953-55 from Chennai Law College, and practised law in Chennai High Court for 6 years.
He then became the legal consultant for TTK group for over 12 years. Here, he had smartly used a tactic to get a case dismissed from a begruntled employee.
World's best narrative setters DMK had deployed a half-baked filmmaker to peddle their often repeated agenda, portraying "Aryam" as a villain and Dravidam as a savior.
Let's fact check some of their much popularized narrative claims in this short read (1/6)
Claim: "Education was gatekept in TN, Dravidam opened it for all"
Fact: 78.5% of the 1.42 lakh Hindu students in 1825 Madras Presidency were non-Brahmins
Where was Dravidam in 1825?
TN was always a hotspot for education, churning out scholars from all communities.
Claim: "Dravidam introduced mid-day meal schemes"
Fact: Theosophical society run schools had introduced the scheme to improve attendance, as early as 1905. Justice Party was against Theosophical society and its Home Rule Movement. It was K Kamaraj and later MGR who expanded on these schemes state-wide.
Do you know why DMK is a mighty force that OWNS narratives, whereas its measly opponents are forever playing catch-up in an uphill battle?
It is because proponents of Dravidam know & care abt something that intellectuals of the non-left disregard and disrespect. Read on (1/10)
The common people of TN are moved primarily by emotions. They are wired to think that good speakers are good thinkers, and to the common man, rhetoric = reality.
And DMK is master of using the Greek technique of pathos, to persuade people into buying their narratives. How?
Dstocks own Cinema, Street play, Reality shows, Mega Serials - basically every mass medium that has "mind share". They use emotions to their benefit.
They plant the highly sticky ideas of victimization by a clear opponent - Tam vs Hindi, Aryan vs Drav, State v Centre.
Ever wondered why iconoclastic invaders across the world specifically cut off noses, ears, hands or eyes of the pagan idols with ideological passion?
Did you know this belief directly correlates with anti-Brahm rhetoric of Dravidian politics?
An important thread (1/10)
Context: The ancient world was not monotheistic at all like today.
It was a pagan world with many Gods: Zeus, Poseidon, Thor, Aphrodite, Durga, Shiva, Vishnu.
And each region had their own national God - Athena of Athens, Padmanaba of Trivandrum and Yahweh, the God of Israel.
Even Jews were not monotheistic originally -they were monolaters. Meaning, they didn't deny that other Gods didn't exist, they simply didn't worship them.
Its the first step to monotheism: "My God is greater than other Gods, so I shan't worship them or put them before mine."