I will be offline again for some period, but I wanted to make a few comments/opinions, in a short thread:
1. On the upcoming "spring offensive". What offensive? There will very likely not be one by then, sorry. This hallucination exists mainly in media and twitter.
2. The currently pledged (insufficient) battalions will barely be ready by May (at earliest), not to mention it is a mess of barely compatible systems. Everything else pledged drags years deep, into 2024/2025. This also assumes no "fading pledges" and bullshit promises.
3. Russians have immense reserves and prepared positions, of which are yet to be tested, and are built in great depth. Even 2-3 western mechanized brigades is not enough to "turn the tide" - for this it's needed 5x more, at minimum.
4. Offensive actions don't happen in a vacuum, you need primary and supporting offensives, etc. There is no "rush" into a narrow pocket towards Melitopol... The enemy can quickly react to such nonsense.
5. Ammunition is a much bigger problem for the ZSU than for RU. Much of the RU "shell hunger" narrative is simply used to explain away their slow progress, but for us, it's a severe issue.
6. RU will likely lose offensive potential in June/July, and will revert to defensive postures, while attempting to regnerate force as before. I have mention I think they will eventually mobilize 1.2mil inside UA. This is not ending soon.
7. It's very possible for the war to last many years of oscillating defensive/offensive lulls, before ending as suddenly as it started in 2014. Any predictions past a few months is futile, including association football analogies...
8. High risk "surprises" like forcing the Dnipro are not impossible (among other things), unlike believed widely. How effective they would be, is another question.
9. Expect important news in Bakhmut soon.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I think it is worth making a thread addressing some common misconceptions about the war. While well-intentioned, there is a lot of "rosy/idealized" thinking lately. I will try to list some major ones I can think of:
- Footages of tanks/APCs/etc getting hit by art are seen with extreme selection bias. There are thousands of misses for every hit. Sometimes, teams will hunt a single vehicle for days.
- There is nowhere close to a parity in artillery, overall I'd still say it's 7:1 RU advantage
- Drones (especially with thermals) are still in VERY short supply. I bet, consumers in a typical American city have more than the entire ZSU does.
- Guided munitions are amazing, but the "lifeblood" of the war is still dumb munitions. It is still needed in significant volume.
I am wanting to make a thread on some speculations here. In essence, addressing the situation with the west bank of Kherson, and the ongoing rumors of a "soon complete withdrawal". This will NOT be the case, at least not for the entire bridgehead. I will explain in long:
In the current configuration, Kherson city itself has a diminished value, in a military sense. The main value of the west bank Kherson area (as a whole) is to delay ZSU actions on Nova Kakhovka, which is an enormous risk to Krim. I have spoken of this risk in previous postings.
Anything else, like holding Kherson city, is more of a liability than of an aid. Some say that North Kherson group will withdraw over the Inhulets if the Beryslav line is broken, to regroup at the city, but this is not a logical action - you will only risk encircle yourself there
- There is too little attention on the area north of Svatove. Things have developed well, but most maps show almost nothing. For example, I have mentioned Kyslivka 3 days ago and Arapivka 2 days ago, but rumors are just starting (eg. Kyslivka). See previous messages for details.
- For defensive lines, it is likely Russian command has selected the Svatove ridge as their next defensive line; it is relatively good defensive territory. This is a long line however, so there are risks.