*bigotry* is a subject that right-wing (and "independent") bigots—@NateSilver538, @DavidAFrench, @DKThomp, whoever, there's so many of these clowns—have attempted to keep as confused as possible. they want to pretend "bigot" is merely a slur, not a meaningful word.
(1/x)
but as I've pointed out before, bigotry is really just overdeveloped snobbery. the snob—the person who has very definite ideas about their personal superiority, and the superiority of their own intellect and tastes and everything else—is already showing "bigoted" behavior.
(2/x)
just as one may exhibit abusive behaviors from time to time without necessarily being "an abuser" (i.e. someone whose whole personality is abusive behavior), a snobbish person may say bigoted things without necessarily being "a bigot", i.e. someone who does nothing else.
(3/x)
a dedicated bigot—@NateSilver538, @elonmusk, whoever—has gone the whole length with their snobbery; they think that God or "genes" or some other powerful cosmic force *guarantees* they they are, in fact, superior and correct about everything, all the time, without doubts.
(4/x)
and thus bigots like @NateSilver538 and @mtaibbi tend to get very far in Western society, which places such a high priority on boundless egotism and confidence in oneself. bigots feel like they've got the ultimate reason to be confident: they're "intrinsically superior".
(5/x)
once you're saturated with bigotry, it pervades literally every aspect of your behavior—all of @NateSilver538's interactions with others, all his preferences and tastes, all his opinions, all his personal politics and ideologies, are manifestations of bigotry in some way.
(6/x)
why does @NateSilver538 (or @jonathanchait or @DavidAFrench or any other bigot) eat certain foods, avoid certain music, talk about certain pet political issues? bigotry. these are people who habitually do things in order to demonstrate their superiority over others.
(7/x)
@NateSilver538 thinks he's "intrinsically superior" to anyone who chooses their own pronouns—his reasons are stupid and illogical but that doesn't matter. he's already better than the "pronoun people", in his head. they're "dumb" and "moronic", he's a math genius. etc.
(8/x)
it's easy to see why people like @NateSilver538 and @mattyglesias have strayed towards "race science" of the @charlesmurray / @EPoe187 / @SwipeWright sort: they need to do SOMETHING to "prove" that they're the geniuses they think they are. so they look to magic "genes".
(9/x)
"I have super special 'Anglo-Saxon' intelligence genes" isn't a winning argument to anything, but @NateSilver538 and @mtaibbi and other racists really want to THINK that. these are people with fundamentally magical thinking about science and especially about biology.
(10/x)
the Evolution Fairy™ has waved a magic wand over @NateSilver538 and @DKThomp and the rest of them, and that's why they're the smartest people in the Cosmos—the mere fact that they can think in such a way about "evolution" shows how little they understand biology.
(11/x)
it's fairly easy to guess why @NateSilver538 &c. have developed such puerile ideas about science and biology and evolution in particular: these are shallow and superficial and "fun" loving people (right, @jonathanchait?) and they've learned "science" from entertainment.
(12/x)
@NateSilver538 &c. have a @neiltyson / @TEDTalks grasp of "science"—i.e. they've consumed a lot of superficial, badly written, intellectually incoherent, *memetic* content mentioning scientific ideas, and they think that's *enough*. remember, these people aren't educated.
(13/x)
this is the environment in which @bindelj / @Docstockk penis ideology has been able to flourish: a media culture stuffed to bursting with shallow and ignorant people like @NateSilver538 and @jonathanchait, scientifically illiterate people easily deceived by big words.
(14/x)
and of course the @GOP, which has always been *radioactive* with hatred of knowledge and education—for they're a party of Christian bigots like @DavidAFrench and @MattWalshBlog—has latched on hard to penis-policing ideology. it fits their antintellectual spirit very well.
(15/x)
the very idea that *biology* is something that Saint @RonDeSantisFL ought to be enforcing at gunpoint—i.e. the @MattWalshBlog / @DavidAFrench / #conservative goal for the United States—is ludicrous. that is not how "biology" works. it's pure Christian fanaticism.
(16/x)
it feels like the inevitable end result of right-wing Christian ideology that's been dedicated to destroying science for many decades now. what started with an attempt to erase evolution and global-warming is now ending with trying to police human sexuality and gender.
(17/x)
@DavidAFrench and @MattWalshBlog and all the other Christian fascısts have been trying to destroy American democracy and American science for a long long time. they have never varied from this goal; it's part of their personal faith, and they're proud of clinging to it.
(18/x)
and now we're paying the price. the Christians are making their last desperate push to destroy democracy in the west. @RonDeSantisFL is just the most obvious example of what Christians like @MattWalshBlog and @RepMTG want for America: fascıst dictatorship.
~Chara of Pnictogen
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
argh! I forgot the most important bit! because it's about Baldr and Hoðr and Loki—and a very *particular* version of their story, the one that most people know, which comes from Snorri Sturluson and the "Prose Edda" and which then got picked up by English poets.
#CSLewis cites Matthew Arnold's "Balder Dead", a retelling of the story of Baldr's death from the "Prose Edda", as one of his early influences in his semi-autobiographical work "Surprised by Joy".
now I speculate: Jack Lewis probably had Baldr in mind when he converted.
(2/x)
for it's been *noted* that the narrative about Baldr's death from Sturluson's "Prose Edda" is *almost* like the Christian narrative. Baldr is impossibly beautiful and impossibly pure, with amazing powers, then treachery lays him low—but he'll be coming back after Ragnarok!
we still love @JRRTolkien, which is why we detest Peter Jackson so very much—we think he turned one our favorite childhood works of art into coarse crass (and racist) action trash, and for some reason hardly anyone's noticed. I suppose it's a sign we're in the Bad Place™.
(1/x)
it's one of the ill-kept secrets of the modern-day fascıst movement, by the way, that they *adore* the Peter Jackson #LOTR films—people like @MattWalshBlog and @Timcast and @benshapiro have probably watched those trashy movies a thousand times. they're big hits, after all.
(2/x)
and if someone like @benshapiro adores your movie, then you've done something dreadfully wrong—and I earnestly hope that Peter Jackson's treatment of #Tolkien one day gets a very thorough critical laceration. Jackson's a hacky director, and he made polished hackwork.
it suddenly occurred to me: the amusing realization that the mere existence of *Caligula* confers a teensy bit of credibility to the Christian idea of the Incarnation. it's more credible that a human being might have claimed to have fully divine nature, that is to say.
(1/x)
we can guess that someone *like* Jesus may have existed, because a historical figure with much better attestation—namely Gaius Julius Caesar Augustus Germanicus, also known as "Little Boots" or _Caligula_ because as a child he dressed as a soldier—thought he was a god.
(2/x)
hence *that* much of the Jesus story is plausible anyway: it's plausible to imagine, at least, someone _claiming_ to be the one and only Son of God, authorized to tell us all how wonderful Heaven was and drive out "demons" and all that. questionable activities, perhaps.
I'm going to talk about something very painful now, but it must be discussed. it's a specific antisemitic trope. let these words serve as a content warning for the material I'm about to discuss:
I won't discuss this painful subject in too much detail—if you want to learn about the origins of the antisemitic trope of the Jewish Problem™ in Western culture, read up on the NSDAP and the Third Reich—but take care that you read *good* books about the Third Reich.
(2/x)
that's the problem, isn't it? people like @NateSilver538 and @mtaibbi don't read the *good* books about the Third Reich, but you can be pretty certain they've read a lot of bad ones. that's especially likely if they're the sort of people who think "history" means battles.
that's not some simple *insult*. it's in the nature of bigotry—it's the universal psychological defence mechanism, the escape-valve from any social awkwardness or personal failure. @charlesmurray is a bigot, and therefore he's a loser.
(1/x)
he's a mediocre, muddled man who feels like he's entitled to a permanent position in American scholarship even though he's muddled and mediocre. @AEI gave @charlesmurray some *illusion* of success but Murray dreamed bigger than an AEI propaganda job—you can bank on that.
(2/x)
a genuine biologist, a man who made fundamental contributions to evolutionary theory—Stephen Jay Gould—took @charlesmurray to pieces, and his response was to swallow his humiliation and double and treble down on bigotry, because that's how bigots deal with being failures.
we weren't *great* students in college. we maybe got as many Fs as As, if not more. we failed out of @Caltech completely! still we struggled and pushed our way towards our degrees. here's two of them.
as a result, we've seen a lot of people like @NateSilver538. *fakers*.
while we were at @SDSU especially, which was a very big and crowded school full of people studying every conceivable subject, it was impossible not to run into people like @NateSilver538, @mattyglesias, @mtaibbi, &c.—people who thought that "higher learning" was a crock.
(2/x)
likely they were there mostly out of a sense of family obligation: their parents had money and power over them and pushed them to get a degree chiefly because college degrees are vital to social status in "the West". #capitalism may hate education but it loves *degrees*.