#1 The British Health Secretary, @MattHancock, suggested "to frighten the pants off everyone" in leaked WhatsApp messages to his media adviser. In this mini thread, I will explain why I believe he should be charged with intentional mass murder.
#2 It is known that constant fear and anxiety lead to chronically elevated cortisol levels. Cortisol is the stress hormone that not only lowers testosterone levels (resulting in low libido, less sex and children - well played, Bill) but also contributes to higher mortality rates.
#3 For instance, a study published by @TheLancet found that doubling the serum cortisol levels was associated with a 42% increase in mortality after adjusting for age, comorbidities, and laboratory tests. thelancet.com/journals/landi…
#4 As can be seen from the above-posted WhatsApp messages, @MattHancock acted intentionally. As Health Secretary, he was well aware of the health consequences. The aforementioned facts about cortisol were known to him. telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/03/0…
#5 Looking back, it's hard to assess how many years of human life were lost due to his intentional fearmongering. But looking at the whole population, it must be at least in the tens of thousands. It's high time for Julian Assange and Matt Hancock to switch places.
#6 And then miraculously the ‘vaccines’ arrived. #democide
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
#1 Yesterday, an article by @luckytran was published in @guardian, which urged people not to believe the Cochrane Review article on the efficacy of masks. Apart from wild accusations against "anti-maskers" and the "anti-vax movement," the article had little to offer. A THREAD🧵⬇️
#2 The author @luckytran claims that masks are a wonderful tool. However, this has been disproven a thousand times, not least by @ianmSC. Anyone who has an understanding of physics or looks at historical data from the Spanish Flu knows that masks are ineffective and harmful.
#3 Tran then accuses the authors of comparing apples to oranges, that is, comparing the flu to Covid, and that this is unscientific. He says that covid is much more contagious - which is a bold claim. So either masks help prevent the transmission of viruses or they don't.
#1 Did you know that tomorrow, there will be a vote on @WHO's CA+ draft, which will transform the WHO into a powerful public health technocracy with the power of a world government? My colleagues at @TheRedactedInc have analyzed the document, and it's concerning. 🧵A THREAD...
#2 The upcoming changes to the @WHO will grant them the alarming power to reject natural treatments such as vitamin D in favor of pharmaceuticals, with the potential to greatly limit our health options.
#3 It's concerning that the primary funder of the @WHO, the @gatesfoundation, has close ties to pharmaceutical companies and publishes books detailing how the next pandemic will unfold. Despite WHO's inadequate policies during Covid, it is set to gain more power.
Olá @TaschnerNatalia. Há três anos, você tem afirmado que as máscaras e vacinas funcionam, sem apresentar provas. E qual é sua posição sobre sua aliança com @PeterHotez, que difamou vozes críticas como 'terroristas' e pediu a sua supressão pelo exército. (go.nature.com/3EwTCKK)
🇬🇧 Hello @TaschnerNatalia. For 3 years, you have claimed that masks and vaccines work without providing evidence. Also, you consistently cozy up to @PeterHotez, who has defamed critics as 'terrorists' and called for their suppression by the military. What is your stance on this?"
Let's never forget that this woman was one of the driving forces that spread fear, panic, and misinformation here in Brazil. Justice will always prevail
Hi @oatila, as a scientist, you've abused your position to spread paid propaganda for big pharma companies like @pfizer. You also advocated for compulsory vaccination and silencing critical voices. On a scale from 1 to Hitler, how fascist do you consider your statements nowadays?
🇧🇷 Oi @oatila, como cientista, você espalhou propaganda paga para gigantes farmacêuticas como a @pfizer e defendeu a vacinação obrigatória e censura de vozes críticas. Em uma escala de 1 a Hitler, quão fascista você considera suas declarações hoje em dia?
🧵THREAD: The future of our planet is at stake. Misleading information is all over the media. I am raising my voice based on my understanding from Michael Crichton's "State of Fear." In his book, he sheds light on the hazards of politicizing science. It's more topical than ever.
2/ Picture a brand new scientific idea that alerts us to an impending crisis and offers a solution. This theory quickly gains the support of media outlets, top scientists, politicians, and prominent figures across the globe.
3/ Research is supported by well-known philanthropists and conducted at esteemed universities and research centres. The crisis is frequently covered by the media and is included in the curricula of colleges and high schools.
Dear @HolzheuStefan, as a scientist, you didn't only target the unvaccinated but consistently demanded the cancellation of critical scientific colleagues (e.g. @SHomburg). How do you view your scientific Stalinism retrospectively?
@HolzheuStefan@SHomburg Statements like "I used to care when unvaccinated people died. But now...🙄" (see Tweet) are inexcusable. But that's what sets us apart. We cross our fingers every day that you won't suffer any side effects from the vaccine, while many of you wish us bad.