argh! I forgot the most important bit! because it's about Baldr and Hoðr and Loki—and a very *particular* version of their story, the one that most people know, which comes from Snorri Sturluson and the "Prose Edda" and which then got picked up by English poets.
#CSLewis cites Matthew Arnold's "Balder Dead", a retelling of the story of Baldr's death from the "Prose Edda", as one of his early influences in his semi-autobiographical work "Surprised by Joy".
now I speculate: Jack Lewis probably had Baldr in mind when he converted.
(2/x)
for it's been *noted* that the narrative about Baldr's death from Sturluson's "Prose Edda" is *almost* like the Christian narrative. Baldr is impossibly beautiful and impossibly pure, with amazing powers, then treachery lays him low—but he'll be coming back after Ragnarok!
(3/x)
I'm laying long odds here that if Jack Lewis was convinced by @JRRTolkien's (unfortunately specious) reasoning about the Christian story being the summation of European paganism somehow, it was largely because of Baldr's tale from the "Prose Edda"—that *one* data point.
(4/x)
the resemblance is too great, too tempting. there's a reason for the likeness: Snorri Sturluson was *Christian*. he had a reason to shape his retelling of Norse legends into a form that seemed like a premonition or foreshadowing of Jesus and Christianity: he was Christian.
(5/x)
it was in Sturluson's interest to present Norse tales as though they were foreshadowing Christianity—as though Baldr returned (after Ragnarok) were really what *Jesus* was all about, even though Jesus was no Baldr. that's the *implication* of making Baldr resemble Jesus.
(6/x)
for we have a *very* different tale about versions of Baldr and Hoðr in which they're straightforward peers and rivals, and Hoðr kills Baldr out of plain ordinary jealousy—and Loki is nowhere in sight, in this Danish form of the Baldr story (q.v. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baldr)
(7/x)
that's a telling sign that the "Prose Edda" and Sturluson was being rather selective and slanted in its reshaping of legends of Baldr and Hoðr—here's a totally different version of their story. that's usual with pagan legends, which tend to turn up in multiple variations.
(8/x)
and it was done by a Christian writer! I'm not sure how widely that's appreciated—the best known and most widely retold and redistributed tales about the Norse deities come from Sturluson's "Prose Edda" and it's by a *Christian*, putting his own spin on these stories.
(9/x)
so if #CSLewis decided to convert to Christianity because of "Balder Dead" he made a *dreadful* mistake—his idea of "Baldr" was filtered through multiple Christian lenses, first Sturluson's, then Matthew Arnold's. of *course* the poor guy ended up resembling Jesus!
(10/x)
but that's rather the problem with Christian writers, or writers stamped with Christian values—they end up rewriting Jesus over and over. heck @jordanbpeterson thinks his personal narrative is the same as Jesus's. #HarryPotter is basically #JKRowling doing a Jesus trope.
(11/x)
obviously I don't think Baldr was a mere shadow or foretelling of Jesus (I don't think he was the "God of War" Baldr either but I'm biased) and I think it's wrong to pretend he was nothing more. Baldr's got his own story and it's not over yet! Baldr's yet to have his day.
(12/x)
after all...Snorri Sturluson *did* say he was coming back, right? so did @neilhimself, for that matter.
we still love @JRRTolkien, which is why we detest Peter Jackson so very much—we think he turned one our favorite childhood works of art into coarse crass (and racist) action trash, and for some reason hardly anyone's noticed. I suppose it's a sign we're in the Bad Place™.
(1/x)
it's one of the ill-kept secrets of the modern-day fascıst movement, by the way, that they *adore* the Peter Jackson #LOTR films—people like @MattWalshBlog and @Timcast and @benshapiro have probably watched those trashy movies a thousand times. they're big hits, after all.
(2/x)
and if someone like @benshapiro adores your movie, then you've done something dreadfully wrong—and I earnestly hope that Peter Jackson's treatment of #Tolkien one day gets a very thorough critical laceration. Jackson's a hacky director, and he made polished hackwork.
it suddenly occurred to me: the amusing realization that the mere existence of *Caligula* confers a teensy bit of credibility to the Christian idea of the Incarnation. it's more credible that a human being might have claimed to have fully divine nature, that is to say.
(1/x)
we can guess that someone *like* Jesus may have existed, because a historical figure with much better attestation—namely Gaius Julius Caesar Augustus Germanicus, also known as "Little Boots" or _Caligula_ because as a child he dressed as a soldier—thought he was a god.
(2/x)
hence *that* much of the Jesus story is plausible anyway: it's plausible to imagine, at least, someone _claiming_ to be the one and only Son of God, authorized to tell us all how wonderful Heaven was and drive out "demons" and all that. questionable activities, perhaps.
I'm going to talk about something very painful now, but it must be discussed. it's a specific antisemitic trope. let these words serve as a content warning for the material I'm about to discuss:
I won't discuss this painful subject in too much detail—if you want to learn about the origins of the antisemitic trope of the Jewish Problem™ in Western culture, read up on the NSDAP and the Third Reich—but take care that you read *good* books about the Third Reich.
(2/x)
that's the problem, isn't it? people like @NateSilver538 and @mtaibbi don't read the *good* books about the Third Reich, but you can be pretty certain they've read a lot of bad ones. that's especially likely if they're the sort of people who think "history" means battles.
that's not some simple *insult*. it's in the nature of bigotry—it's the universal psychological defence mechanism, the escape-valve from any social awkwardness or personal failure. @charlesmurray is a bigot, and therefore he's a loser.
(1/x)
he's a mediocre, muddled man who feels like he's entitled to a permanent position in American scholarship even though he's muddled and mediocre. @AEI gave @charlesmurray some *illusion* of success but Murray dreamed bigger than an AEI propaganda job—you can bank on that.
(2/x)
a genuine biologist, a man who made fundamental contributions to evolutionary theory—Stephen Jay Gould—took @charlesmurray to pieces, and his response was to swallow his humiliation and double and treble down on bigotry, because that's how bigots deal with being failures.
*bigotry* is a subject that right-wing (and "independent") bigots—@NateSilver538, @DavidAFrench, @DKThomp, whoever, there's so many of these clowns—have attempted to keep as confused as possible. they want to pretend "bigot" is merely a slur, not a meaningful word.
(1/x)
but as I've pointed out before, bigotry is really just overdeveloped snobbery. the snob—the person who has very definite ideas about their personal superiority, and the superiority of their own intellect and tastes and everything else—is already showing "bigoted" behavior.
(2/x)
just as one may exhibit abusive behaviors from time to time without necessarily being "an abuser" (i.e. someone whose whole personality is abusive behavior), a snobbish person may say bigoted things without necessarily being "a bigot", i.e. someone who does nothing else.
we weren't *great* students in college. we maybe got as many Fs as As, if not more. we failed out of @Caltech completely! still we struggled and pushed our way towards our degrees. here's two of them.
as a result, we've seen a lot of people like @NateSilver538. *fakers*.
while we were at @SDSU especially, which was a very big and crowded school full of people studying every conceivable subject, it was impossible not to run into people like @NateSilver538, @mattyglesias, @mtaibbi, &c.—people who thought that "higher learning" was a crock.
(2/x)
likely they were there mostly out of a sense of family obligation: their parents had money and power over them and pushed them to get a degree chiefly because college degrees are vital to social status in "the West". #capitalism may hate education but it loves *degrees*.