New Dr Fauci emails leaked!
Dr Fauci was instrumental in spreading the lack of possibility of the ‘lab leak’ theory
The WHO were complicit & controlled the process
Evidence from Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus investigation
(a thread)
Dr Fauci was instrumental in spreading the lack of possibility of the ‘lab leak’ theory
The WHO were complicit & controlled the process
Evidence from Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus investigation
(a thread)
On 1 Feb 2020, Dr Fauci was first warned that Covid may have leaked from a lab in Wuhan and may have been INTENTIONALLY genetically modified. /1
Evidence released by the Select Subcommittee suggests Dr Fauci 'prompted' the publication that would ‘DISPROVE’ the lab leak theory.
The authors of the paper SKEWED EVIDENCE to achieve that goal.
This indicates Dr Fauci pressured scientists to disregard the lab leak theory/2
The authors of the paper SKEWED EVIDENCE to achieve that goal.
This indicates Dr Fauci pressured scientists to disregard the lab leak theory/2
Although supporters of Dr Fauci argue that the scientists did their duty & followed the evidence:
In Aug 2021 Scripps Research said “Dr. Andersen’s view evolved consistent with the evidence at his Disposal”.
This indicates Dr Fauci was doing his job as a scientist. /3
In Aug 2021 Scripps Research said “Dr. Andersen’s view evolved consistent with the evidence at his Disposal”.
This indicates Dr Fauci was doing his job as a scientist. /3
But then we had the email from Dr Anderson that explicitly stated their intentions:
“Our main work over the last couple of weeks has been focused on trying to disprove any type of lab theory”
Is this following the science or making the science follow you? /4
“Our main work over the last couple of weeks has been focused on trying to disprove any type of lab theory”
Is this following the science or making the science follow you? /4
In Feb 2020, Dr. Andersen wrote to Nature and said that the research WAS PROMPTED by Dr Fauci.
But in the same email he said that they were told to “provide agnostic and scientifically informed hypothesis around the origins of the virus." /5
But in the same email he said that they were told to “provide agnostic and scientifically informed hypothesis around the origins of the virus." /5
In July 2021 Dr Anderson told the New York Times
That they FOUND Covid was ENGINEERED.
But he claimed they then looked at Covid in Bats and Pangolins to dispel this idea. /6
That they FOUND Covid was ENGINEERED.
But he claimed they then looked at Covid in Bats and Pangolins to dispel this idea. /6
But the question is why did Dr Anderson make this claim? In 2020 when he was going through the peer-review process to publish in Nature he said the following:
“There is no evidence on present data that the pangolin CoVs are directly related to the COVID-19”. /7
“There is no evidence on present data that the pangolin CoVs are directly related to the COVID-19”. /7
Dr Farrar, WHO chief scientist, was involved in the paper which disregarded the lab leak theory but his name WASN'T PUBLISHED.
When Dr Lipkin was sent the paper:
“I’ll have a chat with Jeremy [Farrar] in a little while to see if can [sic] get you more directly involved.” /8
When Dr Lipkin was sent the paper:
“I’ll have a chat with Jeremy [Farrar] in a little while to see if can [sic] get you more directly involved.” /8
Dr Holmes agreed with Dr Lipkin about the possibility of the lab leak theory.
He also said it was “Pre-adapted for human spread since the get go”
But then he needed to run it by Dr Farrar of the World Health Organisation. /9
He also said it was “Pre-adapted for human spread since the get go”
But then he needed to run it by Dr Farrar of the World Health Organisation. /9
In Feb 2020, Dr. Lipkin's email to Dr. Farrar highlighted that he MANAGED the project.
He even confirmed that he would pressure Nature to publish the paper.
WHO controlled the project and pressured its publication. /10
He even confirmed that he would pressure Nature to publish the paper.
WHO controlled the project and pressured its publication. /10
The new evidence is devastating for Dr Fauci and the WHO.
It shows that Dr Fuaci promoted the paper and WHO managed it.
The lab leak theory and engineering of covid theory were ignored based on a false premise. /11
It shows that Dr Fuaci promoted the paper and WHO managed it.
The lab leak theory and engineering of covid theory were ignored based on a false premise. /11
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
