James Lavish Profile picture
Mar 7, 2023 36 tweets 6 min read Read on X
As you may have heard recently, Credit Suisse is in trouble. Deep Trouble.

Question is, can they—*will they*—seize customer deposits to pay off creditors in a bankruptcy restructuring?

Time for a Bankruptcy 🧵👇
🤑 Bail-outs

If you’re in your 20’s or older, you likely remember the Great Financial Crisis

You know, that event in 2008 to 2010 that pushed major banks to the edge of catastrophic-level collapse because of poor—or non-existent—risk management policies?
As consequence for their gross negligence, most of these banks received the due punishment they deserved

The companies went bankrupt. The managers lost their bonuses, many were fired and many arrested, and they were all left to deal with a life of shame and poverty 🤡

Well, no.
If you remember correctly, none of that happened

The CEOs and managers received their fat bonuses. They kept their seats. They remain in power and are wealthy beyond imagination

How?
Government led and government funded bail-outs

They screwed up. They lost money. They threatened to collapse the entire financial system with their sheer stupidity and arrogance

And they got bailed-out. With taxpayer-funded dollars.
Actually, the Fed and Treasury printed money to do it, but we’re all paying for it, make no mistake

It’s just hidden from us through monetary manipulation and inflation

Items tucked nice and neatly away in a gnarled mess of Treasury and Fed balance sheet assets and liabilities.
Flash forward to 2023, and we have a few messes creeping up again

UK pension funds over-levered with LDIs? On the verge of collapse?

The Bank of England bailed them out.

If you want to read about that, I wrote a newsletter all about it, here: jameslavish.substack.com/p/ldis-and-the…
Italy and Spain and Greece struggling with debt and in danger of systematic collapse of their banking systems?

The European Central Bank creates a manipulation called the Anti-Fragmentation Tool.

Wrote about that, too, you can find it here:
jameslavish.substack.com/p/-whats-an-an…
TL;DR: Instead of austerity in those countries, the ECB buys their debt to prop them up, essentially handing Germany the mop and the bill

No consequences. For anyone, ever

Well, except for you and me.
And soon, it could get even worse than the hidden money printing and government led bail-outs with the taxpayers footing the bill

You got it. This is where *bail-ins* come into play.
🧐 Bail-Ins

In essence, a bail-in is when a bank’s creditors (yes, depositors, too) must forgive some of its debt to help save the bank from collapse

Is that even legal?
Three hips and a hooray for the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Act of 2010 which makes bank bail-ins totally legal in the United States

In fact, the US has *declared* that the federal government will no longer inject taxpayer dollars to prevent big bank failure.
Instead, banks have been granted the authority to use debt capital as equity to avoid insolvency

This includes: unsecured creditor capital, common and preferred equity shareholders, bondholders, and...depositors

Yay?
It means that the bank can use customer deposits to save its own risk-management deficient arse

Here's the skinny on how bail-ins differ from bail-outs: Image
Wait, wait, wait, you say

That’s my money. They’re just holding it for me, but it is still mine

Well, not exactly.
In fact, when you deposit money in a bank—virtually any bank—you're in effect *loaning* the bank that money

And for the pleasure of allowing the bank to use your money any way they see fit, you receive interest on your deposit

A measly 0.5% annually, if you're lucky, today.
The deposit becomes an asset on the books of the bank which is offset by a liability to you

Similar to if you bought a Certificate of Deposit (CD) or a Treasury bond (supposedly risk-less, but readers of 🧠The Informationist know better than that).
But, you do have some protection. This protection comes in the form of FDIC insurance

In the United States, any deposits up to $250,000 are protected by the Federal Government. As long as the bank itself is federally insured.
So, if you have $300,000 in a savings account at Chase, $250,000 of that is insured and backstopped by the US Government. $50,000 of it is left unprotected

So, if you're someone who has $1 million on deposit, I'd consider spreading that around to be backstopped by FDIC insurance
And yes, this includes your IRA

Sitting in cash during the current market uncertainty?

That’s right. If you're older or have been fortunate in saving for retirement, you need to know that only $250,000 of your cash equivalent or money market deposits are insured by FDIC.
If your IRA custodian bank goes under, you may lose any or all of that cash above $250,000

Now you may be saying, OK, this all sounds like hypothetical conjecture. Question is, does this actually ever happen? If so, when and where?

I thought you’d never ask.
☠️ History of Bail-Ins

Back to the Great Financial Crisis and its aftermath

A few years after the wipeout of massive financial institutions and its ongoing fallout, regions of Europe were still reeling.
One region in particular was Greece + neighboring island, Cyprus

In 2013, a concoction of events hit Cyprus banks like a financial tsunami:

Exposure to over-levered property co's, Greek debt crisis contagion, and Cyprus Treasuries downgraded to junk status by ratings agencies.
The ongoing reluctance of the Cyprus government to restructure its banking sector led them to imminent collapse

Enter the ECB

Oh joy.
In a €10 billion bail-out plan led by the European Commission, the ECB, and the International Monetary Fund (IMF), Cyprus agreed to close the country's second-largest bank, the Cyprus Popular Bank

A bail-out, you say...sounds familiar.
Not exactly though, because the plan included an agreement for the bank to seize ~48% of all uninsured deposits: i.e., any deposit over €100,000

In return, they gave depositors shares of equity in the bank

Essentially worthless equity, of course

Yeah, thanks for nothing.
And the EU leaders loved it

So, in 2013, the EU introduced resolutions to make the bail-in a common principle, announcing it had transferred the responsibility of a failing banking system from taxpayers to unsecured creditors and bondholders, just like Dodd-Frank did in the US.
So, though it is a short history, it’s an important one

Because the groundwork has been laid for, once again, the banks to avoid responsibility and just lay it off on you

Their creditor

On that, and on to Credit Suisse...
😱 Credit Suisse and Can This Happen to You?

First, let’s check on the health of the Swiss bank—scratch that, let’s check for a pulse.

Because Credit Suisse just got hit by a run-on-the-bank bus Image
Whoa. Clients pulled 111 billion Swiss francs out of the bank in the last three months

And as we know, lower deposits = lower revenues = losses instead of earnings

To wit, Credit Suisse reported a loss of US$1.3 billion for the last quarter of 2022.
Roughly translated: Credit Suisse is in deep 💩

And if it continues like this, they will go belly up

Bankrupt.
But because the EU and ECB have declared no more bail-outs, guess who’s left holding the bill?

That’s right grasshopper,

In the event you still have deposits with Credit Suisse, I suggest you consider alternative banks

And I suggest you expedite the process.
So, whether you live in the United States or Europe, I strongly encourage you to research and know your region and its rules

After all, these things seem to change with every crisis and set of politicians

Bail-in laws and federal deposit insurance is different for every country
And then there’s the whole question about the FDIC being insolvent itself, and can they even bail out any bank at this point?

But that’s a whole newsletter in and of itself

One I can see in 🧠The Informationist’s near future. 😉
This thread is a summary of a recent Informationist Newsletter. If you enjoyed it, make sure to:

1. Follow @jameslavish to see more investment related content
2. Subscribe to The Informationist to learn one simplified concept weekly: jameslavish.substack.com
So, it seems $CS Credit Suisse was just the start.

Careful out there, kiddies.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with James Lavish

James Lavish Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jameslavish

May 8
*Money Printing*

A seemingly simple, yet confusing topic.

I mean, why even sell bonds to the public, when the Fed can just print more dollars and pay for whatever the government wants to spend?

The answer is simple but requires a little critical thinking.

Time for a Fed 🧵👇
If you’ve been on Twitter in the last week, you likely saw a video clip of Jared Bernstein, the Chair of the United States Council of Economic Advisers, ‘explaining’ bonds

(Yes, the group that advises the White House on economic policy) Image
Even so, he seemed to really struggle with the basic concepts and how Treasuries work

Let's be honest, these are hard concepts to grasp

So, let’s break them down, nice and simple, to understand.
Read 44 tweets
Jan 15
There was massive hype and fanfare leading up to the #Bitcoin spot-ETF launch.

Yet, the launch didn't quite live up to expectations. There wasn't a tsunami of capital inflow, and there was no 'God Candle'

So, was the #Bitcoin ETF launch a failure?

Time for an ETF 🧵👇
🤓 BTC Launch Stats

First things first, how are the new spot-based Bitcoin ETFs are different from the other Bitcoin ETFs (futures-based) that have been trading for years?
The new Bitcoin ETFs are spot-based and must own actual #Bitcoin to match their NAVs (Net Asset Values)

This makes them far more attractive than futures-based ETFs (paper BTC) for investment advisors and institutions who cannot buy actual #Bitcoin for their clients or portfolios
Read 72 tweets
Dec 28, 2023
The US Treasury just closed out 2023's debt bacchanal with a final 7yr Note auction.

While it wasn't quite abysmal, it was nothing short of dismal.

Time for a quick Treasury 🧵👇
First, remember the last 7yr Note auction in Nov *was abysmal*

- BTC of 2.44
- A 2.1bp tail
- Foreign demand down to 63.9%
- Primary Dealers stuck with 20.3% of auction
How about today's 7yr Note Auction?

- BTC was 2.50, slightly better
- Tail was 2.2bp, slightly worse
- Foreign demand of 63.7%, virtually same
- Primary Dealers took down 16.9%, slightly better
Read 10 tweets
Dec 27, 2023
Markets have ripped higher, up 5% this month, and much of the move came after Fed Chair Powell's last press conference.

The famous 'Fed Pivot'

But what is the Fed Pivot, and what does history tell us about the market and economy *after* a pivot?

Time for a Fed 🧵👇
😏 What is a Pivot?

First, what exactly is The Fed Pivot?

Put simply, when the Fed tightens monetary policy, it raises interest rates and/or sells assets off its balance sheet (i.e., quantitative tightening or QT)

When it stops raising rates, this is called a Fed Pause.
The Fed may or may not continue selling assets (QT) during the pause phase

To date this year, it has continued QT while keeping rates paused

A full pause would mean that The Fed is not just lowering rates, but has also stopped QT.
Read 39 tweets
Dec 12, 2023
Success! It seems that today's 30-Yr Treasury Auction was solid, across the board.

But was it *stellar*?

Time for a short Treasury 🧵👇
Some quick stats:

- BTC was 2.43 vs 2.24 last auction
- No tail, and actually a slight stop-through of .3 bps
- Foreign demand alleviated pressure from primary dealers

Here's a visual comparison vs. the last two auctions: Image
A couple of notes:

1) This was a *re-opening*, strategically making it easier to find liquidity, as it essentially just adds to a prior auction and makes the issue more attractive to buyers.
Read 8 tweets
Nov 28, 2023
The Reverse Repo Facility

Lots of talk about how it's dwindling fast and may soon be empty...but does it really matter?

Yes, it matters. A whole lot more than you may think.

Time for a Fed 🧵👇
🎯 Repo vs Reverse Repo

What are they, and what're their differences?

Put simply, they are two overnight lending markets run by the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC)

All purchases and sales (open market operations) are made by the NY Fed Open Market Trading Desk (the Desk)
The Repo

A repo is basically a repurchase agreement between two parties

The term can be used in many different types of transactions, but we most often hear it used to describe overnight transactions of US Treasuries.
Read 42 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(