🚨THREAD🚨
The arrest of Thomas Webb Jurgens only serves to highlight the Southern Poverty Law Center's long history of carrying water for Antifa extremists.
In 2020, the SPLC attacked Trump's decision to designate Antifa a "terrorist organization," defining Antifa as "a broad, community-based movement composed of individuals organizing against racial and economic injustice." It claimed Trump was echoing "far-right extremists."
“Individuals loosely affiliated with Antifa are typically involved in skirmishes and property crimes at demonstrations across the country, but the threat of lethal violence pales in comparison to that posed by far-right extremists," the SPLC claimed.
Yet the summer 2020 riots following George Floyd's death led to more than $2 billion in damages and the deaths of more than two dozen Americans, including David Dorn.
In 2021, the SPLC condemned as a "far-right and racist" view that the riots represented a bigger problem than police violence against blacks. The group claimed that the far right had constructed a "false alternative reality" about the violence.
As I documented in my book "Making Hate Pay: The Corruption of the Southern Poverty Law Center," activist researcher Megan Squire—dubbed Antifa's "secret weapon"—fed information to the SPLC. Since my book's publication, Squire has joined SPLC full time.
Extremism researcher @EoinLenihan mapped the Twitter interactions of Antifa activists, finding ties to SPLC reporter Michael Hayden. @CathyYoung63 confirmed that Hayden had a record of "downplaying Antifa violence while advancing Antifa talking points." dailysignal.com/2023/03/07/sou…
Extremism researcher Laird Wilcox told me that Antifa uses "information provided by the SPLC." He noted that Antifa agitators are “virtually” all white, “in order to avoid associating their violence and terrorism with black or brown activists.”
SPLC provided a grant to establish the Canadian Anti-Hate Network, which modeled itself on SPLC. A Canadian judge ruled evidence shows "CAHN did in fact assist Antifa and... the movement has been violent." CAHN has called for libraries to be "sites of anti-fascist resistance."
Even in SPLC's statement claiming the alleged domestic terrorist attorney was a legal observer, the Southern Poverty Law Center downplayed the violence of the "Stop Cop City" protest.
The SPLC said the lawyer’s arrest “is not evidence of any crime, but of heavy-handed law enforcement intervention against protesters.”
Agitators threw “rocks, bricks, Molotov cocktails, and fireworks at police,” according to Atlanta police.
The National Lawyers Guild, which identified the SPLC attorney and alleged terrorist as one of the guild’s legal observers, called all 23 arrests Sunday, out of 34 detained, “part of ongoing state repression and violence against environmental justice protesters.”
The Atlanta Police Department released video footage of the black bloc Antifa rioters descending on the construction site in Atlanta. The Southern Poverty Law Center's staff attorney was among this horde.
Colorado LGBTQ groups pushed for HB25-1312, a bill that would define "misgendering" and "deadnaming" as "coercive control" and mandate custody courts consider them.
Democrats excluded parental rights groups from discussion, comparing them to the KKK.
🧵2/10
The bill passed the Colorado House, 36 in favor, 20 against, and 9 absent in a largely party-line vote.
The Colorado House has 43 Dems and 22 Republicans. The Colorado Senate has 23 Dems and 12 Republicans.
Who are the Biden political appointees who "burrowed in" to the federal bureaucracy?🤔
The list includes a former White House Environmental Justice Advisory Council member, former USAID staff, and immigration lawyers.
I'll explain "burrowing in," then get to the names.
🧵1/15
First, what is "burrowing in?" @hughhewitt gave a good concise definition in an interview with me at @JobCreatorsUSA's Freedom Fighters Summit
Presidents appoint more than 3K people for "political" positions, but there are at least 2.3M federal workers. Most are in ostensibly non-political "career" positions.
Burrowing in involves switching from a "political" to a "career" position.
🧵2/15
Why is this a problem?
“The biggest challenge that every single new Cabinet secretary and their subordinates will face is the entrenched bureaucrat,” @TheFGA's @stew_whitson told me.
He described both overt opposition to the president and “quiet insubordination.”
The SPLC released its hate map for 2018, and Nessel responded by pledging, "Hate cannot continue to flourish in our state."
"I have seen the appalling, often fatal, results of hate when it is acted upon," she added. "That is why I am establishing a hate-crimes unit in my office—to fight against hate crimes and the many hate groups which have been allowed to proliferate in our state."
That may sound noble, but if you know anything about the SPLC, it should be unnerving, if not downright terrifying.
🧵2/10
You see, the SPLC is no neutral arbiter on hate.
It champions almost every leftist cause you've ever heard of, and accuses those who dare disagree of being driven by "hate."
Do you follow the traditional Jewish or Christian teachings on sexuality? You're an "anti-LGBTQ hate group."
Want our immigration laws enforced? You're an "anti-immigrant hate group"—even if you have legal immigrants on the board.
Are you concerned about radical Islam inspiring terrorism? You're an "anti-Muslim hate group."
Do you think parents should have a say in their kids' education? You're an "anti-government extremist group" and on the hate map.
Last year, the SPLC even added groups of doctors who oppose "gender-affirming care" and @againstgrmrs to the "hate map."
When the FBI was caught citing the SPLC's "hate map" in targeting "radical traditional Catholics," it was rightly a huge scandal.
A shocking new poll from @ScottWRasmussen shows just how many D.C.-based bureaucrats who voted for Kamala Harris say they plan to disobey a lawful Trump order if they consider it bad policy.
Yes, people who work for the taxpayer plan to disobey the people's elected president. This is the key definition of the deep state.
RMG Research, Rasmussen's polling firm, identifies federal government managers as federal employees in the DC region who earn at least $75K.
The firm asked this essential question:
"Suppose that President Trump gave an order that was legal but you believed was bad policy. Would you follow the president's order or do what you thought was best?"
THREE QUARTERS—75%—of DC bureaucrats who voted for Kamala Harris said they would "do what I thought was best" rather than follow Trump's order.
Only 16% said they'd do as the people's elected president ordered.😲
🧵2/10
NOTE: This isn't asking if they'd follow Trump over the law.
This is just asking if they place their own opinion of good or bad policy ahead of the person who was elected by the people to lead the executive branch.
It's also worrying that 18% of those who voted for Trump say they'd "do what I thought was best" instead of following the order. That's probably a lot lower than it would have been if the poll was conducted in 2017, however.
“It’s codifying into law that if their ideology confuses your child, and you don’t affirm that delusion, you’re committing child abuse and can lose custody of your child,” Caldwell told me.
“We have now crossed the Rubicon of parental rights with this bill,” he added.
🧵2/6
When Caldwell asked whether parental rights groups had been allowed to weigh in on the legislation, a Democrat—Rep. Yara Zokaie—mocked the very idea.
“A well-stakeholded bill does not need to be discussed with hate groups, and we don’t ask someone passing civil rights legislation to go ask the KKK their opinion,” she quipped last Tuesday.
Zokaie doubled down on the comparison on Friday, explicitly citing the Southern Poverty Law Center.
Colorado state Rep. Yara Zokaie doubles down on comparing parental rights groups to the KKK, citing the Southern Poverty Law Center.
Zokaie did so while defending a bill that would define "misgendering" and "deadnaming" as "coercive control" and would require courts to consider it in custody battles.😡
So, parents who don't want to trans their kids should have their kids removed from them, and if these parents team up to form a group, they'll be demonized as hateful like the KKK.
Zokaie had first compared parents groups to the KKK in a hearing on Tuesday.
She attempted to explain why parental rights groups had been excluded from discussions on HB 1312, the bill in question.
“A well-stakeholded bill does not need to be discussed with hate groups, and we don’t ask someone passing civil rights legislation to go ask the KKK their opinion,” she quipped.
🧵2/7
Two House Republicans slammed Zokaie's remarks.
“Calling parental advocacy groups ‘hate groups’ is just their excuse to marginalize and ignore them while maintaining a pretense of moral superiority,” @COrepKdeGraaf told me.
@RepCaldwell said the comparison uses “inflammatory labels that are only meant to create division” and “dismisses the valid concerns of parents.”