Stephen Barlow Profile picture
Mar 8 13 tweets 5 min read
I want to let people into a dirty secret. Why our governments have taken no effective action on the climate crisis for 31 years, and why we are hurtling to climate catastrophe/global suicide.

It's why no major government wants to talk about ending fossil fuel burning.
1/🧵
It's very simple. The major value of fossil fuel companies, are their reserves. The oil, gas and coal reserves, which form the major assets of fossil fuel companies, are only worth something, if they can be exploited until well into the future.
2/
If governments decided to phase out fossil fuel burning, preferably, if they had done it 30 years ago, those assets would go from being very valuable, to almost worthless. I believe the name for this is stranded assets.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stranded_…
3/
If a such a decision was made, the value of fossil fuel companies would collapse almost overnight, and the value of some of the biggest companies on the stock markets, what billionaires, banks etc, have got all their money invested in, would become almost worthless.
4/
It isn't just direct investments in fossil fuel companies, but in highly interlinked and interdependent investments, all dependent on fossil fuel assets. It's this that props up the wealth of the richest and most powerful individuals on Earth.
5/
Right from the 1992 Rio Earth Summit and the signing of the UNITED NATIONS FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE - UNFCCC, which put into place the COP talks, the most obvious move, has been to phase out fossil fuels.
un.org/en/conferences…
6/
Yet, oddly, no government has wanted to even mention, let alone discuss the most obvious solution to the climate crisis, and the self-created global suicidal course we're, of climate catastrophe we are hurtling towards. Utterly bizarre.
7/
Until that is, you realise, that even talking about it, could massively devalue some of the biggest companies in the world, which all the powerful and rich people are invested in. Where they could lose most of their wealth, and power if that happened.
8/
This is how we have got 31 years into the future, without anyone seriously mentioning, let alone talking about the phasing out of fossil fuel burning. It's why we're hurtling towards global suicide, and no one wants to talk about why.
9/
If I've got it all wrong, then please feel free to explain. But please no circumlocution and ad hominem attacks, where you discuss absolutely everything, except the topic this thread is about. Which is why didn't we just agree to phase out fossil fuels, 31 years ago.
10/
It's all just so obvious, that you struggle to understand why no one wants to talk about it. Or rather why no government, corporation, billionaire and the media they own, wants to discuss it. Why they stop all discussion of this topic.
11/
Okay, all my life, when I point out the obvious, I get told I don't understand the real world, like these oh so clever people justifying business as usual. But no, I don't get why we have to commit global suicide, just to preserve the great wealth, status and power of a few.
12/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Stephen Barlow

Stephen Barlow Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SteB777

Mar 9
This is exactly my point yesterday. I think this government's amoral strategy, over boat crossings by refugees over the Channel, might be far more sinister than people think.

That it's a nasty inflammatory strategy to lay the ground for extremism.
independent.co.uk/news/uk/politi…
1/🧵
I made this point yesterday, and now Amber Rudd says it makes no sense.

What appears to be a plan to stop cross Channel crossings, may actually be a plan designed to fail. To trigger outrage against immigrants, and to take advantage of the situation.

2/
The big question, is why would the government make a futile attempt to stop cross Channel refugee crossings, if it is bound to fail?

We've had enough years of culture wars, to know what sort of situation they are trying to provoke.
3/
Read 10 tweets
Mar 9
Owen Jones is exactly right. For years Andrew Neil presented the BBC's politics flagship show. He was Conservative with a very big C. Went on highly politicised rants in newspapers and social media. Not blip about his political bias from either the Tories or the Tory Press.
1/5
It really is rank hypocrisy of the highest order for the Tories and Tory Press, to try and silence football commentator @GaryLineker for making a legitimate, none party political or ideological, moral point, on the grounds of supposed BBC neutrality.
2/5
Apparently, what the Tory hegemony means by neutrality, is Conservatism with a very big C. That anyone who breaks ranks from it, is in their eyes not neutral. It is hard to think of a more opinionated and politically biased BBC political presenter, than Neil.
3/5
Read 5 tweets
Mar 8
It is now crystal clear what the Conservative Party's strategy is, with its almost certainly illegal immoral, fascist type policy over refugees, arriving across the Channel.

Almost certainly this policy will be challenged in the courts, the EU and the UN.
1/
I think this government has done this knowing full well their policy will be challenged in the courts and by other bodies like the EU and the UN, so they can play out this fake heroic attempt to stem immigration, until they were thwarted by the "woke" EU and UN.
2/
It is the worst type of disingenuous and amoral political theatre, to whip up fear of immigrants, so they can play out this charade to the inflamed public. Hoping the public will be so inflamed that they'll forget about the corruption and incompetence of this government.
3/
Read 7 tweets
Mar 7
This country is beset by a whole array of serious problems. Out of control food inflation, energy prices, the NHS in crisis, and of course the climate and ecological crisis. But what does the PM focus on, but refugees crossing the channel in boats.
theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/m…
1/🧵
Of course, in right wing propaganda media, and the people taken in by these lies. These are all linked, all the problems are caused by us being supposedly "swamped" by immigrants.
2/
Of course this is total nonsense, in the overall scheme of things, the costs and pressure on the problem areas of our society are miniscule from this issue, and are nothing to do with any of these deep seated problems.
3/
Read 11 tweets
Mar 5
Here's Houdini with his coloured leg rings, when Tony Cross radio-tagged him last year on Fenns Moss, in April 2022. By coincidence I was with Tony when he caught him last year, and photographed him on arrival this year at the Moss. Image
It's an interesting story, because when his radio tag stopped moving, we feared the worst. But he is fine as you can see.
@curlewcalls @Macgregor_Cal @fidhw @IoloWilliams2 @naturebites @AlanDaviesbirds @Jannerbirder @ChrisGPackham @Natures_Voice @MarkAvery @CurlewCountry
For anyone worried by the radio tagging. Curlews have declined by 50% in the last 25 years. Whilst there is still a significant breeding population on Fenns and Whixall Moss NNR, their numbers aren't what they were.
Read 4 tweets
Mar 5
A very important story, not given the coverage it deserves. It gives precious insight into not only our UK government's real attitude to Net Zero by 2050, but that of other governments.

Essentially, they have done nothing to meet Net Zero targets.
theguardian.com/environment/20…
1/🧵
Many climate experts and scientists have warned, that most Net Zero promises by governments, seem very dubious, and have been dubbed by Professor Kevin Anderson @KevinClimate as "Not Zero" i.e. greenwash.
carbonneutralcambridge.org/net-zero-or-no…
2/
For anyone familiar with the pattern of climate promises and actions since the 1992 Rio Earth Summit, the pattern is familiar. To promise action in 20-30 years time, and then to renege on the promises when we get there, and to make more false promises, way off in the future.
3/
Read 25 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(