I have taken some time to collect my thoughts on our favorite Swedish stock... $CDON..... a🧵with our updated thoughts:
1/ 1) This Company has literally had everything thrown at it. A sick CEO, fraudulent merchant(s), a marketing "guru" who knew nothing about e-commerce, and then an e-commerce market that was then down 20 pct... That pretty much feels like the kitchen sink....
$CDON
2/ The Board empowered the CFO into an operational roll late last year and reduced headcount by nearly 50 pct. As we expected the leaner team performed BETTER! most recent company conference call, they called out the fact that they were profitable in Jan. $CDON
3/ On our math... if the Company is profitable in Jan then on the same GMV levels (Company said the expect GMV to grow throughout the year), we would expect EBITDA to be 30-40 mm....More if GMV grows throughout the year. $CDON
4/Furthermore, the Company announced a take rate increase of 15 pct or approximately 1.5 pct gross on 2bn of GMV.... This is another 30mm of EBITDA that we are not taking into account. This could put EBITDA around 60-70mm potentially for core $CDON
5/ So why do Fyndiq.. .Fyndiq has 25-26 pct take rates and based on our research of what AMZN is charging in Nordics of excess of 20 pct..... we think another 3.5 pct take rate increase is in the bag... This is another 70mm of EBITDA to the combined company. $CDON
6/ FYNDIQ also has very good S&M efficiency and with combination could like improve our costs and efficiency as well. This could also be 30,40,50 mm of costs. $CDON
7/ Let us not forget the duplicative G&A, R&D, and compliance costs that will be removed across both companies. Could this be another 30+ MM? $ CDON
8/It is easy to see this doing 200 million of EBITDA on a combined basis WITHOUT any future GMV growth.
$CDON
9/ Sweden has had negative e-comm comps all year bc of energy prices and Russia (22). Industry data implies comps will turn positive in the spring. $CDON has a history of winning market share (even last year). What happens when the "market" is a tailwind and not a headwind.
10/ If the mkt. grows 10 percent per year (slower than historical) its not crazy to think this grows 20..board and mgmt demand more. ....Under those circumstances, $CDON is trading at 7x EBIT... These businesses which are growing and profitable trade 1-3 pct FCF yields...
11/If the path to our synergies are realized that is 600 SEK by the end of this year on 2024 numbers... or this is 3 pct FCF yield growing topline 20 and FCF growing 30 pct... $CDON
1/ I was ruminating on the recent quarter of $CDON and how to think about valuation. It has been our experience that the market never really gets SOTP right.
$FCAU
$PAR
$RICK
$APG
$CDON
$IDT
2/ In every single case there were biz's with a diff cost of capital that the market could not value individually -- bc had a diff margins structure / growth rate/ or investment plan. The market has a way of throwing up its hands and saying - I dont know!
3/ We tend to figure out the event path and allocate "bridge capital" to these types of opportunities when we estimate / forecast the path to value realization
@joelmcohen@NeckarValue I totally agree with this "show not tell" IDEA. We have spent 10 years being ourself and its basically a family office. Does it mean that ourselves is not palatable to institutional capital? I think there is originality to our process and certainly demonstrable effort being put
@joelmcohen@NeckarValue In. I think many "emerging" managers....10 years in I definitely feel like im still emerging given that we have had a few pivots/rebuilds/rehauls....think that one of the biggest issues with institutional capital is that the process seems arbitrary and there is no feedback.
@joelmcohen@NeckarValue And then you would argue that modulating the strategy/pitch to attract capital takes away from the authenticness of the strategy and the GP. So its kind of a cicular process/catch 22
In the 4th quarter, BRINK activated 885 new locations and added 2.3 mm of ARR. That means the average store added 2,600 ARPU per YEAR. If we add 8,000 locations in Fiscal 2021 (Remember all of backlog will get worked down in 2021) per call. $PAR
This is approx. 21mm of incremental ARR. Incremental ARPU seems low considering DQ is approx 3,400-3,500. And remember, any price increases to existing is pure incremental ARPU. We suspect Brink can EASILY double ARR in 2021.T his means ARR exiting 2021 is ~60 mm $PAR
Giving no credit to RM returning to growth or incremental payments or M/A. $PAR
@joelmcohen Joel-This is a great question. I think the answer is simpler than you think. Consider some of the best track records in the investment business: Greenblatt, Weschler, IGSB, Chris Hohn, Prescott, SPO(before they got too big), Eddie (before all in on SHLD).What was the commonality?
@joelmcohen Concentration, Conviction, and an iconoclast who was super passionate about stock picking and competitive at the top.
@joelmcohen The institutional investment business is not conducive to long periods of underperformance or super lumpy returns like -30, +5, +120... the institutional world wants 20,20,20,20 with great sharpes and monthly liquidity.