@Ladidas7@RightToLifeUK Of course not. If such a scenario were real, nobody I know (and no pro-life organization), would advocate causing the mother's death.
But it's not real. You just made it up. It's an excuse, not a reason.
Any such condition which could kill the mom would also kill her baby.
@Ladidas7@RightToLifeUK The vast majority of abortions in the UK are obtained by perfectly healthy mothers, of perfectly healthy babies, in perfectly normal pregnancies. The problems driving pregnant moms to make that tragic choice are not medical, they're social & financial.
Baby boy sucking his toes:
@Ladidas7@RightToLifeUK Pro-life Christian organizations stand ready to help pregnant mothers solve those problems, without killing their babies.
But abortion promoters want to prevent them from doing so, by stopping Christian pro-lifers from even offering that assistance to the mothers who need it.
@Ladidas7@RightToLifeUK I guess such heartlessness is to be expected, from people who make a business of killing defenseless babies. Somehow it's still shocking. I truly cannot understand how some people want to destroy young lives.
@Ladidas7@RightToLifeUK The abortion industry also seeks to prevent expectant mothers from seeing images like this, of an unborn baby sucking his right thumb, and waving his left hand:
@Ladidas7@RightToLifeUK Some mothers choose abortion is ignorance. They may not realize that their unborn babies are already unique, living, human beings, with beating hearts.
You'd deprive them of that knowledge, to increase the odds that they'll kill their babies. That's monstrous.
Early heartbeat:
@Ladidas7@RightToLifeUK A dear friend who had her abortion many years ago (in college), told me she thinks of it every day. "The sadness never goes away," she said.
Please open your heart to babies in danger, and mothers in need. Please stop promoting the tragedy of abortion. siragainesville.com/abortion-regre…
Well, his first 36 seconds (apparently learnt from scientists) was correct.
But the rest, which he called "beyond the science," culminating in his claim that "humans do not affect the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere," is codswallop.
2/13》Mankind currently adds about 5 ppmv/year of CO2 to the atmosphere.
Nature removes an average of about 2.5 ppmv/year of CO2 from the atmosphere.
Economic downturns, like the Covid-19 recession, reduce that 𝘀𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁𝗹𝘆, as do CO2 emission reduction schemes…
3/13》…𝗕𝘂𝘁 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗺𝘂𝗰𝗵. The Covid-19 pandemic temporarily reduced 2020 CO2 emissions between 4% and 7% (0.2 ppmv to 0.35 ppmv), and emissions rose in 2021. google.com/search?q=how+m…
A 50% (≈2.5 ppmv) reduction would've been needed to prevent a 2020 increase in CO2 level.
But how can you know that if you can't read it? The publisher apparently has a policy of providing free access to articles and papers for 8 weeks, then paywalling them (except that often the first page of the article is still available online).
I also found all five of the “comments on” the paper which the journal has published. For the latter I contacted the authors of several of those responses, directly, and asked them to send me preprints.
The published responses to Skrable et al (2022) are all critical of it. If anyone is inclined to take the paper seriously, I encourage you to read “both sides” before settling on your conclusions.
@BenjaminYumi8 「2/8」Benjamin wrote, "Historically CO2 300ppm caused 1°C (pic 1 from NASA)."
I don't know what that means, nor what "pic 1 from NASA" is.
There's not been a 300 ppmv change in atmospheric CO2 level (during the Quaternary).
@BenjaminYumi8 「3/8」The current 420 ppmv is only about 240 ppmv above the very lowest levels seen in ice cores from near glacial maximums. sealevel.info/co2.html
⟦2/15⟧ There's no evidence that either the very slight warming trend or the very slight reduction in causticness of ocean surface water is in any way harmful. The worry about that is due to a Climate Industry marketing campaign, not because of scientific evidence.
⟦3/15⟧ So-called "ocean acidification" is both a red herring, and a misnomer. The oceans are alkaline (caustic), everywhere. They are not acidic, anywhere (except at some volcanic vents). Ocean chemistry ensures that seawater will never become acidic. molecularmodels.eu/#:~:text=Seawa…
@PaulSim80591297@bennyjohnson You've been lied to, Paul. Climate change isn't making the world "almost uninhabitable." nasa.gov/feature/goddar…
Real scientists call the warmest climate periods — including climate much warmer than now — "climate optimums," because they're objectively BETTER than cold periods.
@PaulSim80591297@bennyjohnson NASA made this video about their satellite measurements, showing what rising CO2 levels are doing for the Earth: