THREADETTE:⬇️piece is much more significant than folks may realize for several reasons. First, it exposes censorship requests were made based BOGUS "research" from FOUR different groups. 1/ thefederalist.com/2023/03/06/twi…
2/ Beyond Hamilton 68, we know have the Atlantic's lab, New Knowledge, and the Global Engagement Center. Second, the connections between the players indicate some of the bad research was same model recycled.
3/ And the connections go much further to the Election Integrity Partnership and the Global Disinformation Index, and here you need to reference this earlier piece too. thefederalist.com/2023/02/28/mee…
THREADETTE: As I dig more into the Censorship Complex, just a quick hit of what a quick search for "disinformation" turns up for government contracts and grants. 1/
2/ With 359 total "grants" appearing for "disinformation" I can't screen-grab them all, but this link should get you there if you are interested. usaspending.gov/search/?hash=0… Cha-ching academia!
3/ Misinformation as the keyword provides different results, although there is likely some overlap: usaspending.gov/search/?hash=c…
Folks: Yes, Twitter is much, much better under @elonmusk but view that an arm-chair lawyer can judge decide a legal analysis is "unsafe" remains operational. This is the warning you get if you try to access this article. thefederalist.com/2023/01/27/cal… 1/
2/ My article opens by making this argument, which is a classic attorney approach to exposing a nonsensical position: Illustrate the absurdity of the position taken to its natural conclusion.
3/ And my legal point has since been confirmed, with the Texas Bar presenting the same point in an unconstitutional attack on AG Paxton. thefederalist.com/2023/02/13/dem…